Pupil's role in educational design: Exploring what it means to have a say in primary school

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1111/ejed.12682
Hendra Y. Agustian
{"title":"Pupil's role in educational design: Exploring what it means to have a say in primary school","authors":"Hendra Y. Agustian","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This case study aims to explore the role of pupils in educational design and what it means to have a say in primary school. Although many educational offers use the slogan ‘pupil-centred’ approach, examples are scarce in which children are seen as partners, let alone co-designers. It is therefore important to investigate to what extent pupils are involved in the design process and decision-making in a primary school context. Concepts such as co-determination, participation, room for choice and competence were discussed. This small-scale study shows that the school policy regarding participation and co-design mainly concerns parents but not pupils as much. Teachers have different perspectives about the importance of children's participation. In general, they would like to involve the pupils more in the design process. The lack of time and educational inspection's demand for standardised outcomes are limiting factors. The pupils believe that they sometimes influence how lessons are conducted at school and are allowed to choose how they work on the subject. In general, they feel positive about their competence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"59 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.12682","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study aims to explore the role of pupils in educational design and what it means to have a say in primary school. Although many educational offers use the slogan ‘pupil-centred’ approach, examples are scarce in which children are seen as partners, let alone co-designers. It is therefore important to investigate to what extent pupils are involved in the design process and decision-making in a primary school context. Concepts such as co-determination, participation, room for choice and competence were discussed. This small-scale study shows that the school policy regarding participation and co-design mainly concerns parents but not pupils as much. Teachers have different perspectives about the importance of children's participation. In general, they would like to involve the pupils more in the design process. The lack of time and educational inspection's demand for standardised outcomes are limiting factors. The pupils believe that they sometimes influence how lessons are conducted at school and are allowed to choose how they work on the subject. In general, they feel positive about their competence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生在教学设计中的作用:探索在小学拥有发言权的意义
本案例研究旨在探讨小学生在教育设计中的作用,以及在小学中拥有发言权的意义。尽管许多教育机构都打出了 "以学生为中心 "的口号,但将儿童视为合作伙伴的例子却很少,更不用说共同设计者了。因此,调查小学生在多大程度上参与了小学的设计过程和决策是非常重要的。我们讨论了共同决定、参与、选择空间和能力等概念。这项小规模的研究表明,学校关于参与和共同设计的政策主要涉及家长,而不是学生。教师对儿童参与的重要性有不同的看法。总的来说,他们希望让学生更多地参与设计过程。时间不够和教育检查对标准化成果的要求是限制因素。学生们认为,他们有时会影响学校的上课方式,并可以选择自己的学习方式。总的来说,他们对自己的能力持肯定态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Engaging in social innovation education: Reciprocal relations between student wellbeing and programme wellbeing outcomes Explaining Temporal Trends in School‐Related Stress: A Decomposition Analysis of Repeated Swedish Survey Data Virtual Reality Technology in Nursing Education: A Qualitative Study A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualisation of Digital Teaching and Learning Publications From Southeast Asia Countries Workload and Need for Recovery in the Academy: The Moderating Role of Student Demands and Meaningful Work Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1