{"title":"Applications of structural equation modeling in plant functional trait research","authors":"Yihang Zhu, Cong Liu, Changhui Peng, Xiaolu Zhou, Binggeng Xie, Tong Li, Peng Li, Ziying Zou, Jiayi Tang, Zelin Liu","doi":"10.1139/er-2023-0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.Plant functional traits, which encompass morphological, physiological, and ecological characteristics, are key to plant adaptation, growth, and development. In recent years, the structural equation model (SEM) has gained widespread use as a powerful statistical tool for studying plant functional traits and conducting research in this field. Its ability to distinguish between direct and indirect effects makes the SEM a robust method for investigating the complex relationships among environment components, traits and ecosystem functions. 2.Here, we review and discuss four commonly used SEMs: (1) the covariance-based structural equation model, (2) the piecewise structural equation model, (3) the Bayesian structural equation model, and (4) the partial least squares structural equation model. We also explore their applications in three typical ecosystems—forest, grassland, and wetland ecosystems—and investigate these forms of SEM in the context of their use in trait-ecosystem function research. 3.Our specific objectives were to: (i) compare the advantages and disadvantages of these four types of SEMs; (ii) analyze the current state of research on SEM applications in plant functional traits across diverse ecosystems; and (iii) highlight new approaches and potential research areas for the future application of SEM in plant functional traits. 4.In this paper, several key findings were obtained: (i) the selection of SEM type is influenced by the different spatial scales of the study. (ii) latent and composite variables were less commonly utilized in recent SEM studies. (iii) while SEMs have proven effective in distinguishing between direct and indirect effects to unravel the complex relationships among multiple variables, indirect effects deserve more attention in general studies. We propose that future applications of SEMs in plant functional traits should incorporate a broader spectrum of traits as well as the trade-offs between them. Larger and more diverse databases of plant functional traits would help make SEM analyses more accurate across different scales.","PeriodicalId":49208,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2023-0128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
1.Plant functional traits, which encompass morphological, physiological, and ecological characteristics, are key to plant adaptation, growth, and development. In recent years, the structural equation model (SEM) has gained widespread use as a powerful statistical tool for studying plant functional traits and conducting research in this field. Its ability to distinguish between direct and indirect effects makes the SEM a robust method for investigating the complex relationships among environment components, traits and ecosystem functions. 2.Here, we review and discuss four commonly used SEMs: (1) the covariance-based structural equation model, (2) the piecewise structural equation model, (3) the Bayesian structural equation model, and (4) the partial least squares structural equation model. We also explore their applications in three typical ecosystems—forest, grassland, and wetland ecosystems—and investigate these forms of SEM in the context of their use in trait-ecosystem function research. 3.Our specific objectives were to: (i) compare the advantages and disadvantages of these four types of SEMs; (ii) analyze the current state of research on SEM applications in plant functional traits across diverse ecosystems; and (iii) highlight new approaches and potential research areas for the future application of SEM in plant functional traits. 4.In this paper, several key findings were obtained: (i) the selection of SEM type is influenced by the different spatial scales of the study. (ii) latent and composite variables were less commonly utilized in recent SEM studies. (iii) while SEMs have proven effective in distinguishing between direct and indirect effects to unravel the complex relationships among multiple variables, indirect effects deserve more attention in general studies. We propose that future applications of SEMs in plant functional traits should incorporate a broader spectrum of traits as well as the trade-offs between them. Larger and more diverse databases of plant functional traits would help make SEM analyses more accurate across different scales.
1.植物功能性状包括形态、生理和生态特征,是植物适应、生长和发育的关键。近年来,结构方程模型(SEM)作为研究植物功能性状和开展该领域研究的强大统计工具得到了广泛应用。结构方程模型能够区分直接效应和间接效应,是研究环境成分、性状和生态系统功能之间复杂关系的可靠方法。2.在此,我们回顾并讨论了四种常用的 SEM:(1) 基于协方差的结构方程模型;(2) 计件结构方程模型;(3) 贝叶斯结构方程模型;(4) 偏最小二乘结构方程模型。我们还探讨了它们在森林、草地和湿地这三种典型生态系统中的应用,并研究了这些形式的 SEM 在性状-生态系统功能研究中的应用。3.我们的具体目标是3.我们的具体目标是:(i) 比较这四种 SEM 的优缺点;(ii) 分析 SEM 在不同生态系统中应用于植物功能性状的研究现状;(iii) 强调 SEM 未来应用于植物功能性状的新方法和潜在研究领域。4.本文获得了几项重要发现:(i) SEM 类型的选择受不同研究空间尺度的影响。(ii) 在最近的 SEM 研究中,潜变量和复合变量较少使用。(iii) 虽然事实证明 SEM 能有效区分直接效应和间接效应,从而揭示多个变量之间的复杂关系,但在一般研究中,间接效应应得到更多关注。我们建议,今后在植物功能性状中应用 SEM 时,应纳入更广泛的性状以及它们之间的权衡。更大、更多样化的植物功能性状数据库将有助于使 SEM 分析在不同尺度上更加准确。
期刊介绍:
Published since 1993, Environmental Reviews is a quarterly journal that presents authoritative literature reviews on a wide range of environmental science and associated environmental studies topics, with emphasis on the effects on and response of both natural and manmade ecosystems to anthropogenic stress. The authorship and scope are international, with critical literature reviews submitted and invited on such topics as sustainability, water supply management, climate change, harvesting impacts, acid rain, pesticide use, lake acidification, air and marine pollution, oil and gas development, biological control, food chain biomagnification, rehabilitation of polluted aquatic systems, erosion, forestry, bio-indicators of environmental stress, conservation of biodiversity, and many other environmental issues.