A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCALP BLOCK WITH 0.5% BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE 0.5% FOR MAYFIELD INSERTION ON HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE AND EFFICACIES OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

Kalapala Ramesh, Bandrapalli Emeema, K. I. Priyadarshini, Chandrasekhar Vallepalli, Madhulika Yeluru
{"title":"A CLINICAL COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SCALP BLOCK WITH 0.5% BUPIVACAINE VERSUS LEVOBUPIVACAINE 0.5% FOR MAYFIELD INSERTION ON HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE AND EFFICACIES OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA","authors":"Kalapala Ramesh, Bandrapalli Emeema, K. I. Priyadarshini, Chandrasekhar Vallepalli, Madhulika Yeluru","doi":"10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 0.5% levobupivacaine for scalp block on the haemodynamic response, efficacy and additional analgesic requirement of these drugs in the post operative period during Mayfield insertion for craniotomy. \nMethods: 60 patients of American society of anaesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ and Ⅱ who underwent elective craniotomies were randomly divided into two groups Group B (n=30) who received scalp block with 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride 25 ml, Group L (n=30) received 25 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine 5 min prior to Mayfield insertion. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate, pain score (VAS score), additional intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement were recorded at different time points. \nResults: Pulse rate, mean arterial pressure were stable during and after Mayfield insertion in both groups at all time points. \nConclusion: Both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for scalp block are equally effective in attenuating haemoynamic responses during Mayfield insertion. Levobupivacaine being less toxic can be a safe alternative for scalp block.","PeriodicalId":13875,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","volume":"114 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijcpr.2024v16i3.4089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Present study was performed to compare the effectiveness of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride and 0.5% levobupivacaine for scalp block on the haemodynamic response, efficacy and additional analgesic requirement of these drugs in the post operative period during Mayfield insertion for craniotomy. Methods: 60 patients of American society of anaesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ and Ⅱ who underwent elective craniotomies were randomly divided into two groups Group B (n=30) who received scalp block with 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride 25 ml, Group L (n=30) received 25 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine 5 min prior to Mayfield insertion. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate, pain score (VAS score), additional intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirement were recorded at different time points. Results: Pulse rate, mean arterial pressure were stable during and after Mayfield insertion in both groups at all time points. Conclusion: Both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for scalp block are equally effective in attenuating haemoynamic responses during Mayfield insertion. Levobupivacaine being less toxic can be a safe alternative for scalp block.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 0.5% 布比卡因和 0.5% 左布比卡因进行头皮阻滞以插入 Mayfield 对血流动力学反应和术后镇痛效果的临床比较研究
研究目的本研究旨在比较 0.5%盐酸布比卡因和 0.5%左布比卡因用于头皮阻滞时的血流动力学反应、疗效以及开颅手术 Mayfield 插入术后的额外镇痛需求。方法:将 60 名接受择期开颅手术的美国麻醉医师协会体能状态Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级患者随机分为两组,B 组(30 人)接受 0.5% 盐酸布比卡因 25 毫升头皮阻滞,L 组(30 人)在插入 Mayfield 前 5 分钟接受 0.5% 左布比卡因 25 毫升头皮阻滞。记录不同时间点的平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏、疼痛评分(VAS 评分)、术中和术后额外镇痛剂需求。结果两组患者在所有时间点插入 Mayfield 期间和之后的脉搏率、平均动脉压均保持稳定。结论用于头皮阻滞的布比卡因和左旋布比卡因在减弱插入 Mayfield 期间的血流动力学反应方面效果相同。左旋布比卡因毒性较低,可作为头皮阻滞的安全替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY STUDY OF PREVALENCE OF POLYCYSTIC OVARIAN SYNDROME AMONG ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT STUDENTS OF NAVODAYA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS PREVALENCE OF KELL BLOOD GROUP SYSTEM IN BLOOD DONORS ATTENDING A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN NORTHWESTERN INDIA APPLICATION OF VALIDATED RP-HPLC METHOD FOR SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF METAXALONE AND DICLOFENAC POTASSIUM IN PLASMA MORPHOMETRIC VARIATION OF FORAMEN OVALE IN DRY ADULT SKULL OF INDIAN POPULATION WITH CLINICAL CORRELATIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1