Coseismic slip model of the 14 January 2021 Mw 6.2 Mamuju-Majene earthquake based on static and kinematic GNSS solution

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Applied Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1515/jag-2023-0041
Oktadi Prayoga, Cecep Pratama
{"title":"Coseismic slip model of the 14 January 2021 Mw 6.2 Mamuju-Majene earthquake based on static and kinematic GNSS solution","authors":"Oktadi Prayoga, Cecep Pratama","doi":"10.1515/jag-2023-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Mw 6.2 Mamuju-Majene earthquake occurred on 14 January 2021, with the epicenter at 118.890°E, 2.972°S. The shaking caused severe damage in West Sulawesi, especially in the Mamuju and Majene cities. Most of the coseismic slip distribution of the Mamuju-Majene Earthquake is derived from the daily solutions, which might include early postseismic deformation. Therefore, we conducted a coseismic slip model using kinematic solution based on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) to determine the best coseismic slip values and model distribution. Our analysis indicates that the coseismic displacement from the kinematic solution is higher than the static solution. The GNSS data was utilized for inversion analysis, considering two potential fault sources, they are the Makassar Strait Central Fault and the Mamuju Fault. We found a larger misfit between the observed data and the model generated on static and kinematic solutions along the Makassar Strait Central Fault. Based on the kinematic solution, the coseismic slip distribution represents that fault rupture spreading along a north-south orientation, while the static solution is centered in the northern part. The maximum coseismic slip from each kinematic and static solution is 0.29 m and 0.11 m, respectively. Meanwhile, the seismic moment generated from the kinematic solution is 1.5 × 1026 N m (equivalent to Mw 6.75), which is greater than the static solution of 2.4 × 1025 N m (equivalent to Mw 6.22).","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2023-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Mw 6.2 Mamuju-Majene earthquake occurred on 14 January 2021, with the epicenter at 118.890°E, 2.972°S. The shaking caused severe damage in West Sulawesi, especially in the Mamuju and Majene cities. Most of the coseismic slip distribution of the Mamuju-Majene Earthquake is derived from the daily solutions, which might include early postseismic deformation. Therefore, we conducted a coseismic slip model using kinematic solution based on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) to determine the best coseismic slip values and model distribution. Our analysis indicates that the coseismic displacement from the kinematic solution is higher than the static solution. The GNSS data was utilized for inversion analysis, considering two potential fault sources, they are the Makassar Strait Central Fault and the Mamuju Fault. We found a larger misfit between the observed data and the model generated on static and kinematic solutions along the Makassar Strait Central Fault. Based on the kinematic solution, the coseismic slip distribution represents that fault rupture spreading along a north-south orientation, while the static solution is centered in the northern part. The maximum coseismic slip from each kinematic and static solution is 0.29 m and 0.11 m, respectively. Meanwhile, the seismic moment generated from the kinematic solution is 1.5 × 1026 N m (equivalent to Mw 6.75), which is greater than the static solution of 2.4 × 1025 N m (equivalent to Mw 6.22).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于静态和运动学 GNSS 解决方案的 2021 年 1 月 14 日 Mw 6.2 马木朱-马杰内地震共震滑移模型
2021 年 1 月 14 日发生了 Mw 6.2 级马木朱-马杰内地震,震中位于东经 118.890 度,南纬 2.972 度。地震给西苏拉威西岛造成了严重破坏,尤其是在马木朱市和马耶内市。马木朱-马杰内地震的共震滑移分布大多来自日解,其中可能包括震后早期变形。因此,我们利用基于全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)的运动学解法建立了共震滑移模型,以确定最佳共震滑移值和模型分布。我们的分析表明,运动解法得出的同震位移高于静态解法。利用全球导航卫星系统数据进行反演分析时,考虑了两个潜在的断层源,它们是望加锡海峡中央断层和马木珠断层。我们发现,沿马卡萨海峡中央断层的观测数据与根据静态和运动学解决方案生成的模型之间存在较大的误差。根据运动学解法,共震滑移分布表示断层破裂沿南北方向扩展,而静态解法则以北部为中心。各运动学解法和静力解法得出的最大共震滑移分别为 0.29 米和 0.11 米。同时,运动方案产生的地震力矩为 1.5 × 1026 N m(相当于 Mw 6.75),大于静态方案的 2.4 × 1025 N m(相当于 Mw 6.22)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Occurrence characteristics of ionospheric scintillations in the civilian GPS signals (L1, L2, and L5) through a dedicated scintillation monitoring receiver at a low-latitude location in India during the 25th solar cycle A new challenge for cadastral surveying in Taiwan: feasibility analysis using combination on CORS data and online PPP service Monitoring of a rockfill embankment dam using TLS and sUAS point clouds Analyzing recent deformation in Wadi Hagul, Eastern Desert, Egypt, via advanced remote sensing and geodetic data processing Regional evaluation of global geopotential models and three types of digital elevation models with ground-based gravity and GNSS/levelling data using several techniques over Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1