The War Within Religion: Towards a More Nuanced Resolution of Religion–Equality Conflicts

Netta Barak‐Corren
{"title":"The War Within Religion: Towards a More Nuanced Resolution of Religion–Equality Conflicts","authors":"Netta Barak‐Corren","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the United States, Canada, Israel, Australia, and many parts of Europe, conflicts between religious liberty and gender equality (including LGBTQ equality) are understood and analyzed as “culture wars.” This view has shaped the sociolegal understanding of the conflict—how the legal community makes sense of cases and interprets their social significance—and has narrowed the perceived scope of legal solutions to religion–equality conflicts to zero-sum, either–or decisions: either a carte blanche for religious objectors or a strict and universal enforcement of anti-discrimination law.\n Drawing on qualitative (N=41) and experimental (N=559) evidence from the United States and Israel and on cases from a range of countries and contexts, this Article makes two arguments: First, the understanding of religion–equality conflicts shall not be complete unless we recognize that they occur both between and within cultures. The two wars are connected in a feedback loop, as the struggle within religion influences what conflicts are waged at the culture war and what conflicts are resolved internally.\n Second, the war within religion has normative implications: in this struggle, religious communities form intermediate solutions to regulate—and mitigate—religion–equality conflicts. These policies can help expand the nuance and scope of legal solutions to the conflict. Showing how, this Article makes a timely intervention in a legal debate that struggles with setting clear rules and seeks to find more nuanced resolutions for the conflict.","PeriodicalId":506824,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","volume":"37 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avae005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, Canada, Israel, Australia, and many parts of Europe, conflicts between religious liberty and gender equality (including LGBTQ equality) are understood and analyzed as “culture wars.” This view has shaped the sociolegal understanding of the conflict—how the legal community makes sense of cases and interprets their social significance—and has narrowed the perceived scope of legal solutions to religion–equality conflicts to zero-sum, either–or decisions: either a carte blanche for religious objectors or a strict and universal enforcement of anti-discrimination law. Drawing on qualitative (N=41) and experimental (N=559) evidence from the United States and Israel and on cases from a range of countries and contexts, this Article makes two arguments: First, the understanding of religion–equality conflicts shall not be complete unless we recognize that they occur both between and within cultures. The two wars are connected in a feedback loop, as the struggle within religion influences what conflicts are waged at the culture war and what conflicts are resolved internally. Second, the war within religion has normative implications: in this struggle, religious communities form intermediate solutions to regulate—and mitigate—religion–equality conflicts. These policies can help expand the nuance and scope of legal solutions to the conflict. Showing how, this Article makes a timely intervention in a legal debate that struggles with setting clear rules and seeks to find more nuanced resolutions for the conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教内部的战争:争取更细致地解决宗教与平等之间的冲突
在美国、加拿大、以色列、澳大利亚和欧洲的许多地方,宗教自由与性别平等(包括 LGBTQ 平等)之间的冲突被理解和分析为 "文化战争"。这种观点塑造了社会法律界对冲突的理解--法律界如何理解案件并解释其社会意义--并将法律解决宗教-平等冲突的范围缩小为零和、非此即彼的决定:要么为宗教反对者提供全权委托,要么严格、普遍地执行反歧视法。本文利用来自美国和以色列的定性证据(N=41)和实验证据(N=559),以及来自一系列国家和背景的案例,提出了两个论点:首先,如果我们不承认宗教-平等冲突既发生在不同文化之间,也发生在不同文化内部,那么对宗教-平等冲突的理解就不会完整。由于宗教内部的斗争会影响文化战争中的冲突以及内部冲突的解决,因此这两场战争在反馈循环中相互关联。其次,宗教内部的战争具有规范性影响:在这场斗争中,宗教团体形成了调节和缓解宗教-平等冲突的中间方案。这些政策有助于扩大解决冲突的法律方案的细微差别和范围。这篇文章展示了如何适时地介入一场法律辩论,这场辩论正努力制定明确的规则,并寻求为冲突找到更细致入微的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
After Misogyny: How the Law Fails Women and What to Do About It Administrative Procedure Acts in Europe: An Emerging “Common Core”? The Constitution of the Russian Federation: A Contextual Analysis Strategic Judicial Empowerment The War Within Religion: Towards a More Nuanced Resolution of Religion–Equality Conflicts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1