Effect of drug therapies on self‐reported chemosensory outcomes after COVID‐19

M. A. Fornazieri, B. M. Cunha, S. P. Nicacio, L. K. Anzolin, José L. B. da Silva, Aristides Fernandes Neto, Deusdedit Brandão Neto, R. Voegels, F. Pinna
{"title":"Effect of drug therapies on self‐reported chemosensory outcomes after COVID‐19","authors":"M. A. Fornazieri, B. M. Cunha, S. P. Nicacio, L. K. Anzolin, José L. B. da Silva, Aristides Fernandes Neto, Deusdedit Brandão Neto, R. Voegels, F. Pinna","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy of medications used following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection on self‐reported alterations in taste and/or smell function.Seven hundred and fourteen persons with self‐reported postcoronavirus disease 2019 (post‐COVID‐19) chemosensory disorders were personally interviewed regarding specific medications they were administered following the acute phase of the disease. The dependent measure—self‐reported total recovery of chemosensory symptoms—was subjected to stepwise logistic regression. Independent predictors included demographic and clinical variables, in addition to specific medications used to mitigate disease symptoms (i.e., systemic corticosteroids, oseltamivir, vitamin C, ibuprofen, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, nitazoxanide, anticoagulants, and zinc).The median time between COVID‐19 symptom onset and the interviews was 81 days (interquartile range: 60–104). Of the 714 subjects, 249 (34.9%) reported total recovery of their chemosensory function; 437 (61.2%) had at least one treatment since the beginning of the disease. Women and those with more comorbidities had undergone more treatments. The recovery rates of the treated and nontreated groups did not differ significantly. Nonetheless, respondents who had used nitazoxanide tended to have a higher rate of self‐reported taste or smell recovery. Those who took oral zinc were less likely to improve.No medication employed during the first months after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection had a clear positive effect on returning self‐reported smell or taste function to normal, although nitrazoxide trended in a positive direction. Oral zinc had a negative effect on the reported recovery of these senses.","PeriodicalId":510563,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":"86 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy of medications used following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection on self‐reported alterations in taste and/or smell function.Seven hundred and fourteen persons with self‐reported postcoronavirus disease 2019 (post‐COVID‐19) chemosensory disorders were personally interviewed regarding specific medications they were administered following the acute phase of the disease. The dependent measure—self‐reported total recovery of chemosensory symptoms—was subjected to stepwise logistic regression. Independent predictors included demographic and clinical variables, in addition to specific medications used to mitigate disease symptoms (i.e., systemic corticosteroids, oseltamivir, vitamin C, ibuprofen, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, nitazoxanide, anticoagulants, and zinc).The median time between COVID‐19 symptom onset and the interviews was 81 days (interquartile range: 60–104). Of the 714 subjects, 249 (34.9%) reported total recovery of their chemosensory function; 437 (61.2%) had at least one treatment since the beginning of the disease. Women and those with more comorbidities had undergone more treatments. The recovery rates of the treated and nontreated groups did not differ significantly. Nonetheless, respondents who had used nitazoxanide tended to have a higher rate of self‐reported taste or smell recovery. Those who took oral zinc were less likely to improve.No medication employed during the first months after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection had a clear positive effect on returning self‐reported smell or taste function to normal, although nitrazoxide trended in a positive direction. Oral zinc had a negative effect on the reported recovery of these senses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物疗法对 COVID-19 后自我报告的化感结果的影响
本研究的目的是评估严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)感染后使用的药物对自我报告的味觉和/或嗅觉功能改变的相对疗效。对自我报告患有2019年冠状病毒病后(COVID-19后)化学感觉障碍的714人进行了访谈,了解他们在疾病急性期后服用的特定药物。因变量--自我报告的化感症状完全恢复情况--进行了逐步逻辑回归。独立预测因素包括人口统计学和临床变量,以及用于缓解疾病症状的特定药物(即全身性皮质类固醇、奥司他韦、维生素 C、布洛芬、羟氯喹、阿奇霉素、伊维菌素、硝唑沙尼、抗凝剂和锌)。从 COVID-19 症状发作到接受访谈的中位时间为 81 天(四分位间范围:60-104)。在 714 名受试者中,有 249 人(34.9%)报告其化感功能完全恢复;437 人(61.2%)自发病以来至少接受过一次治疗。女性和合并症较多的患者接受的治疗次数较多。治疗组和未治疗组的康复率没有显著差异。不过,使用过硝唑沙尼的受访者自我报告的味觉或嗅觉恢复率往往更高。在感染 SARS-CoV-2 后的头几个月中,没有任何一种药物对自我报告的嗅觉或味觉功能恢复正常有明显的积极作用,尽管硝唑尼特有积极作用的趋势。口服锌对这些感官的恢复有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using a customizable L stent for laryngotracheal stenosis: Patterns of success and failure Indocyanine green fluorescence‐guided sentinel lymph node biopsy: A systematic review Diagnostic value of fasting hypopharyngeal salivary pepsin concentration test for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease Pituitary apoplexy is associated with concurrent or subsequent diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus Development and validity of type II sulcus vocalis in excised canine larynx
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1