Approaches to improving valuation decision-making: a review of the literature

Hassan Shuaibu Liman, Abdul-Rasheed Amidu, Deborah Levy
{"title":"Approaches to improving valuation decision-making: a review of the literature","authors":"Hassan Shuaibu Liman, Abdul-Rasheed Amidu, Deborah Levy","doi":"10.1108/jpif-01-2024-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe complexity of property valuation, coupled with valuers’ cognitive limitations, makes some degree of error inevitable in valuations. However, given the crucial role that valuations play in the efficient functioning of the economy, there is a need for continuous improvement in the reliability of reported values by enhancing the quality of the decision-making process. The purpose of this paper is to review previous research on valuation decision-making, with particular interest in examining the approaches to improving the quality of valuation decisions and identifying potential areas for further research.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts a narrative approach to review 42 research articles that were obtained from Scopus and Web of Science databases and through author citation searches.FindingsOur findings show that existing literature is skewed towards examining the use of technology in the form of decision support systems (DSS), with limited research attention on non-technological (i.e. behavioural) approaches to improving the quality of valuation decisions. We summarise the non-technological approaches and note that much of the discussions on these approaches often appear as recommendations arising from other studies rather than original investigations in their own rights.Practical implicationsWe conclude that studies investigating the effectiveness of the non-technological approaches to improving valuation decision-making are lacking, providing various avenues for further research.Originality/valueThis paper presents the first attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of non-technological approaches to improving the quality of valuation decisions.","PeriodicalId":506679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Investment & Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Investment & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpif-01-2024-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe complexity of property valuation, coupled with valuers’ cognitive limitations, makes some degree of error inevitable in valuations. However, given the crucial role that valuations play in the efficient functioning of the economy, there is a need for continuous improvement in the reliability of reported values by enhancing the quality of the decision-making process. The purpose of this paper is to review previous research on valuation decision-making, with particular interest in examining the approaches to improving the quality of valuation decisions and identifying potential areas for further research.Design/methodology/approachThe paper adopts a narrative approach to review 42 research articles that were obtained from Scopus and Web of Science databases and through author citation searches.FindingsOur findings show that existing literature is skewed towards examining the use of technology in the form of decision support systems (DSS), with limited research attention on non-technological (i.e. behavioural) approaches to improving the quality of valuation decisions. We summarise the non-technological approaches and note that much of the discussions on these approaches often appear as recommendations arising from other studies rather than original investigations in their own rights.Practical implicationsWe conclude that studies investigating the effectiveness of the non-technological approaches to improving valuation decision-making are lacking, providing various avenues for further research.Originality/valueThis paper presents the first attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of non-technological approaches to improving the quality of valuation decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进估值决策的方法:文献综述
目的 物業估值的複雜性,加上估值師在認知上的限制,令估值難免會出現一定程度的誤差。然而,鉴于估值对经济的有效运行起着至关重要的作用,因此有必要通过提高决策过程的质量来不断提高报告价值的可靠性。本文旨在回顾以往有关估值决策的研究,尤其关注研究提高估值决策质量的方法,并确定进一步研究的潜在领域。 本文采用叙述法回顾了从 Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库以及通过作者引文搜索获得的 42 篇研究文章。研究结果我们的研究结果表明,现有文献偏重于研究以决策支持系统 (DSS) 为形式的技术的使用,而对提高估值决策质量的非技术(即行为)方法的研究关注有限。我们对非技术方法进行了总结,并指出有关这些方法的大部分讨论往往是其他研究提出的建议,而非其本身的原创性调查。我们的结论是,缺乏对改善估值决策的非技术方法的有效性进行调查的研究,这为进一步研究提供了各种途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practice Briefing: Property valuation and market cycles Unveiling the Indian REIT narrative-qualitative insights into retail investors’ perspectives Assessing climate risk quantification tools – mere fulfilment of duty or actually beneficial? Approaches to improving valuation decision-making: a review of the literature Editorial: Through a referee’s lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1