Enhancing Package Ergonomics for Arthritis Consumers: A Case Study

IF 2.8 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Packaging Technology and Science Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1002/pts.2821
Perian Reese, R. Andrew Hurley, G. Cavender
{"title":"Enhancing Package Ergonomics for Arthritis Consumers: A Case Study","authors":"Perian Reese, R. Andrew Hurley, G. Cavender","doi":"10.1002/pts.2821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because arthritis and limited dexterity affect at least 25% of the US adult population (1) and these issues can make packaging more difficult to open, there has been an overall increase in interest about inclusive packaging (2). Inclusive packaging is designed to ensure that the largest number of consumers possible will be able to open a package without serious difficulty. When designing for those with arthritis, testing is often done using simulation technologies that impair hand and joint movements, such as the Cambridge Simulation Gloves (CSG). However, not all packages have been evaluated for inclusive design, and as such, the goal of this study was to use CSG to evaluate several representative packages currently in the marketplace for inclusivity and to redesign the one deemed most challenging for those with impaired dexterity. The study evaluated product packages that were deemed non‐inclusive, identified common trends between these products, including the necessity for fine finger movements, existence of small gripping areas, and opening mechanisms with little clearance between the two surfaces. Of the products examined, a common aspirin package, was found to be the most difficult to open—it was nearly impossible to lift the seal while wearing the CSG and the package required the most time to open. As such, this product was selected to undergo redesign, and this redesign focused on the tamper evident induction seal. The redesign process involved prototyping an included finger loop and then testing the prototypes using the CSG. This led to a final design consisting of a loop attached to the induction seal, which was then tested with the CSG to evaluate its effectiveness. This study shows the utility of incorporating the CSG into the preliminary design process as opposed to only at the final test of the product. Furthermore, the findings of the study strongly suggest that in designing inclusive packaging for those with limited dexterity, decreasing the required fine finger and joint movements and increasing the gripping areas, especially those involved in the opening mechanism of the package, are the most useful changes to make.","PeriodicalId":19626,"journal":{"name":"Packaging Technology and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Packaging Technology and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because arthritis and limited dexterity affect at least 25% of the US adult population (1) and these issues can make packaging more difficult to open, there has been an overall increase in interest about inclusive packaging (2). Inclusive packaging is designed to ensure that the largest number of consumers possible will be able to open a package without serious difficulty. When designing for those with arthritis, testing is often done using simulation technologies that impair hand and joint movements, such as the Cambridge Simulation Gloves (CSG). However, not all packages have been evaluated for inclusive design, and as such, the goal of this study was to use CSG to evaluate several representative packages currently in the marketplace for inclusivity and to redesign the one deemed most challenging for those with impaired dexterity. The study evaluated product packages that were deemed non‐inclusive, identified common trends between these products, including the necessity for fine finger movements, existence of small gripping areas, and opening mechanisms with little clearance between the two surfaces. Of the products examined, a common aspirin package, was found to be the most difficult to open—it was nearly impossible to lift the seal while wearing the CSG and the package required the most time to open. As such, this product was selected to undergo redesign, and this redesign focused on the tamper evident induction seal. The redesign process involved prototyping an included finger loop and then testing the prototypes using the CSG. This led to a final design consisting of a loop attached to the induction seal, which was then tested with the CSG to evaluate its effectiveness. This study shows the utility of incorporating the CSG into the preliminary design process as opposed to only at the final test of the product. Furthermore, the findings of the study strongly suggest that in designing inclusive packaging for those with limited dexterity, decreasing the required fine finger and joint movements and increasing the gripping areas, especially those involved in the opening mechanism of the package, are the most useful changes to make.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为关节炎患者改善包装人体工学:案例研究
由于关节炎和灵活性受限影响着至少 25% 的美国成年人 (1),而这些问题会使包装更难打开,因此人们对包容性包装的关注度全面提高 (2)。包容性包装旨在确保尽可能多的消费者能够在没有严重困难的情况下打开包装。在为关节炎患者进行设计时,通常会使用会影响手部和关节活动的模拟技术(如剑桥模拟手套 (CSG))进行测试。然而,并非所有包装都经过了包容性设计评估,因此,本研究的目标是使用 CSG 评估目前市场上几种具有代表性的包装的包容性,并重新设计被认为对灵活性受损者最具挑战性的包装。这项研究评估了被认为是非包容性的产品包装,确定了这些产品的共同趋势,包括手指精细动作的必要性、存在较小的抓握区域以及两个表面之间间隙很小的打开机制。在检查的产品中,发现普通阿司匹林包装最难打开--佩戴 CSG 时几乎不可能揭开封条,而且打开包装所需的时间最长。因此,该产品被选中进行重新设计,重新设计的重点是防伪感应封条。重新设计的过程包括制作一个包含手指环的原型,然后使用 CSG 对原型进行测试。最终的设计是在感应封条上附加一个指环,然后用 CSG 进行测试,以评估其有效性。这项研究表明,与仅在产品的最终测试中使用 CSG 相比,在初步设计过程中使用 CSG 是非常有用的。此外,研究结果强烈建议,在为灵活性有限的人设计包容性包装时,减少所需的手指和关节精细动作,增加抓握区域,尤其是涉及包装打开机制的区域,是最有用的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Packaging Technology and Science
Packaging Technology and Science 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Packaging Technology & Science publishes original research, applications and review papers describing significant, novel developments in its field. The Journal welcomes contributions in a wide range of areas in packaging technology and science, including: -Active packaging -Aseptic and sterile packaging -Barrier packaging -Design methodology -Environmental factors and sustainability -Ergonomics -Food packaging -Machinery and engineering for packaging -Marketing aspects of packaging -Materials -Migration -New manufacturing processes and techniques -Testing, analysis and quality control -Transport packaging
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Packaging Design for Dynamic Loads: A Methodological Approach for Corner Impact Situations in Packaging Active Biopackaging Films Enriched With Andız (Juniperus drupacea L.) Shell Extract for Fresh Meat Packaging Characterization of Composite Film Containing Polyvinyl Alcohol Cross‐Linked With Dialdehyde Cellulose Using Citric Acid as a Catalyst for Sustainable Packaging Facile Preparation of Chitosan/Carnauba Wax Emulsion‐Based Coatings for Hydrophobic and Oleophobic Cellulose‐Based Food Packaging Identifying Performance Conditions for a Radical Scavenging Active Packaging Material
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1