Does corporate governance report disclosure increase stock retirement? Evidence from Korea

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Investment Management and Financial Innovations Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.18
Hyoung Seok Choo, Taegon Moon, Sun-ae Cho, Doocheol Moon
{"title":"Does corporate governance report disclosure increase stock retirement? Evidence from Korea","authors":"Hyoung Seok Choo, Taegon Moon, Sun-ae Cho, Doocheol Moon","doi":"10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the influence of the mandatory disclosure of corporate governance reports on stock retirement in Korea. Given the challenges of applying stock repurchasing to measure shareholder return policy in the Korean stock market, this study focuses on stock retirement as a key indicator to examine the effectiveness of introducing the corporate governance report on shareholder return policy. Employing the Difference-in-Differences approach followed, this paper conducts empirical analyses based on 5,932 observations from 2011 to 2020. The main findings indicate a significant increase in stock retirement by companies implementing mandatory disclosures of corporate governance reports (coef = 0.018, p-value <0.01) compared to companies that do not disclose them. The results of the alternative measures for stock retirement and propensity score matching (PSM) model also present a positive association between mandatory disclosure of corporate governance reports and stock retirement, respectively (coef = 0.400 and 1.421, p-value <0.01; coef = 0.019, p-value < 0.1). This study provides evidence to support the notion that introducing corporate governance reports enhances overall shareholder returns, leading to an increase in stock retirement. Moreover, these findings validate that stock retirement is an adequate proxy for analyzing the level of shareholder returns in Korean firms.","PeriodicalId":39060,"journal":{"name":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","volume":"73 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the influence of the mandatory disclosure of corporate governance reports on stock retirement in Korea. Given the challenges of applying stock repurchasing to measure shareholder return policy in the Korean stock market, this study focuses on stock retirement as a key indicator to examine the effectiveness of introducing the corporate governance report on shareholder return policy. Employing the Difference-in-Differences approach followed, this paper conducts empirical analyses based on 5,932 observations from 2011 to 2020. The main findings indicate a significant increase in stock retirement by companies implementing mandatory disclosures of corporate governance reports (coef = 0.018, p-value <0.01) compared to companies that do not disclose them. The results of the alternative measures for stock retirement and propensity score matching (PSM) model also present a positive association between mandatory disclosure of corporate governance reports and stock retirement, respectively (coef = 0.400 and 1.421, p-value <0.01; coef = 0.019, p-value < 0.1). This study provides evidence to support the notion that introducing corporate governance reports enhances overall shareholder returns, leading to an increase in stock retirement. Moreover, these findings validate that stock retirement is an adequate proxy for analyzing the level of shareholder returns in Korean firms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公司治理报告披露会增加股票退市吗?韩国的证据
本研究探讨了韩国强制披露公司治理报告对股票退市的影响。鉴于在韩国股票市场上用股票回购来衡量股东回报政策存在挑战,本研究将股票退市作为一个关键指标,以检验引入公司治理报告对股东回报政策的有效性。本文采用差分法,对 2011 年至 2020 年的 5932 个观测值进行了实证分析。主要研究结果表明,与不披露公司治理报告的公司相比,实施强制披露公司治理报告的公司的股票退市率明显提高(coef = 0.018,p 值为 0.01)。股票退市的替代措施和倾向得分匹配(PSM)模型的结果也分别表明,强制披露公司治理报告与股票退市之间存在正相关关系(coef = 0.400 和 1.421,p-value <0.01;coef = 0.019,p-value <0.1)。本研究提供的证据支持了这样一种观点,即引入公司治理报告可以提高股东的整体回报,从而导致股票退市的增加。此外,这些发现还验证了股票退市是分析韩国公司股东回报水平的适当替代物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal “Investment Management and Financial Innovations” encompasses the results of theoretical and empirical researches carried out both on macro- and micro-levels, concerning various aspects of financial management and corporate governance, investments and innovations (including using of quantitative methods). It is focused on the international community of financiers, both academics and practitioners. Key topics: financial and investment markets; government policy and regulation; corporate governance; information and market efficiency; financial forecasting and simulation; financial institutions: investment companies, investment funds, investment banks, hedge funds, private pension funds; objects of real and financial investing; financial instruments and derivatives; efficiency of investment projects; econometric and statistic methods in project management; alternative investments; ratings and rating agencies.
期刊最新文献
Testing the weak-form efficiency of Arab stock markets after the COVID-19 pandemic The role of financial literacy, digital literacy, and financial self-efficacy in FinTech adoption Optimizing firm performance through contingency factors, enterprise risk management, and intellectual capital in Southeast Asian mining enterprises Does an increase in portfolio volatility create more returns? Evidence from India Impact of intellectual property rights on foreign direct investment in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1