Does an increase in portfolio volatility create more returns? Evidence from India

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Investment Management and Financial Innovations Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.28
Vandana Bhama
{"title":"Does an increase in portfolio volatility create more returns? Evidence from India","authors":"Vandana Bhama","doi":"10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classical view of experts associates greater risks with greater rewards. The present study explores whether increased volatility in portfolios can create more returns for investors by using technical indicators or the buy-and-hold (BH) strategy. The study used closing prices of National Stock Exchange (NSE) 500 index firms for a period of 16 years (2007–2022). Five portfolios ranging from low to high volatility were created using standard deviation as a key measure. Findings indicate that as the volatility of the portfolios increases, the moving average (MA) returns seem to be higher. Across the various MA time frames, the 20-day MA seems to have generated the highest return annually (36.53% before transaction costs and 31.05% after transaction costs) due to reasonable trading opportunities with adjustable transaction costs. The CAPM also generated positive alpha (after bearing transaction costs) in the case of 20, 50, and 100 days MA, with the values being 16.66%, 13.29%, and 12.09%, respectively, in the case of highly volatile portfolios. On the other hand, while the BH strategy created substantial returns in all scenarios, the risk factor was extremely high due to the high standard deviation. Hence, it is suggested that investors/traders consider the BH strategy more cautiously while choosing between technical analysis returns and BH returns. Investors with high-risk preferences may have BH as their choice, while day traders with managed risk appetites may prefer technical tools over BH returns.\nAcknowledgmentThe infrastructural support provided by the FORE School of Management, New Delhi in completing this paper is gratefully acknowledged.","PeriodicalId":39060,"journal":{"name":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Management and Financial Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(2).2024.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The classical view of experts associates greater risks with greater rewards. The present study explores whether increased volatility in portfolios can create more returns for investors by using technical indicators or the buy-and-hold (BH) strategy. The study used closing prices of National Stock Exchange (NSE) 500 index firms for a period of 16 years (2007–2022). Five portfolios ranging from low to high volatility were created using standard deviation as a key measure. Findings indicate that as the volatility of the portfolios increases, the moving average (MA) returns seem to be higher. Across the various MA time frames, the 20-day MA seems to have generated the highest return annually (36.53% before transaction costs and 31.05% after transaction costs) due to reasonable trading opportunities with adjustable transaction costs. The CAPM also generated positive alpha (after bearing transaction costs) in the case of 20, 50, and 100 days MA, with the values being 16.66%, 13.29%, and 12.09%, respectively, in the case of highly volatile portfolios. On the other hand, while the BH strategy created substantial returns in all scenarios, the risk factor was extremely high due to the high standard deviation. Hence, it is suggested that investors/traders consider the BH strategy more cautiously while choosing between technical analysis returns and BH returns. Investors with high-risk preferences may have BH as their choice, while day traders with managed risk appetites may prefer technical tools over BH returns. AcknowledgmentThe infrastructural support provided by the FORE School of Management, New Delhi in completing this paper is gratefully acknowledged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资组合波动性增加会带来更多回报吗?印度的证据
专家们的传统观点认为,风险越大,回报越大。本研究通过使用技术指标或买入并持有(BH)策略,探讨投资组合中波动性的增加是否能为投资者创造更多回报。本研究使用了美国国家证券交易所(NSE)500 家指数公司 16 年(2007-2022 年)的收盘价。以标准差作为关键衡量指标,建立了从低波动率到高波动率的五个投资组合。研究结果表明,随着投资组合波动率的增加,移动平均(MA)回报率似乎更高。在不同的移动平均线时间范围内,20 天移动平均线似乎产生了最高的年回报率(交易成本前为 36.53%,交易成本后为 31.05%),这是因为有合理的交易机会和可调整的交易成本。在 20 天、50 天和 100 天 MA 的情况下,CAPM 也产生了正阿尔法(承担交易成本后),在高波动性投资组合中,其值分别为 16.66%、13.29% 和 12.09%。另一方面,虽然 BH 策略在所有情况下都创造了可观的收益,但由于标准差较高,风险系数极高。因此,建议投资者/交易者在选择技术分析收益和 BH 收益时,更谨慎地考虑 BH 策略。具有高风险偏好的投资者可能会选择 BH,而具有管理风险偏好的日间交易者可能会偏好技术工具而非 BH 回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investment Management and Financial Innovations
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal “Investment Management and Financial Innovations” encompasses the results of theoretical and empirical researches carried out both on macro- and micro-levels, concerning various aspects of financial management and corporate governance, investments and innovations (including using of quantitative methods). It is focused on the international community of financiers, both academics and practitioners. Key topics: financial and investment markets; government policy and regulation; corporate governance; information and market efficiency; financial forecasting and simulation; financial institutions: investment companies, investment funds, investment banks, hedge funds, private pension funds; objects of real and financial investing; financial instruments and derivatives; efficiency of investment projects; econometric and statistic methods in project management; alternative investments; ratings and rating agencies.
期刊最新文献
Testing the weak-form efficiency of Arab stock markets after the COVID-19 pandemic The role of financial literacy, digital literacy, and financial self-efficacy in FinTech adoption Optimizing firm performance through contingency factors, enterprise risk management, and intellectual capital in Southeast Asian mining enterprises Does an increase in portfolio volatility create more returns? Evidence from India Impact of intellectual property rights on foreign direct investment in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1