Next step towards point-of-care molecular diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis (FGS): evaluation of an instrument-free LAMP procedure

Kim J. M. van Bergen, E. Brienen, Bodo S. Randrianasolo, C. Ramarokoto, P. Leutscher, E. F. Kjetland, Angela van Diepen, Floris Dekker, V. Saggiomo, A. Velders, Lisette van Lieshout
{"title":"Next step towards point-of-care molecular diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis (FGS): evaluation of an instrument-free LAMP procedure","authors":"Kim J. M. van Bergen, E. Brienen, Bodo S. Randrianasolo, C. Ramarokoto, P. Leutscher, E. F. Kjetland, Angela van Diepen, Floris Dekker, V. Saggiomo, A. Velders, Lisette van Lieshout","doi":"10.3389/fpara.2024.1297310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection of Schistosoma spp. DNA in gynaecological samples by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is considered to be the reference diagnostic test for female genital schistosomiasis (FGS). However, qPCR needs expensive laboratory procedures and highly trained technicians. Loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) is a more field-friendly isothermal procedure for the detection of parasite-specific DNA, but it still requires electrically powered equipment. Here, we validated a Schistosoma haematobium-specific Sh-LAMP procedure and tested a fully instrument-free isothermal amplification using a novel low-cost, and reusable Temperature-cup (T-cup) device. Specific primers were selected based on published assays, targeting the ribosomal intergenic spacer (IGS) region of S. haematobium. Technical validation of the IGS-Sh-LAMP was performed using 20 negative controls, including DNA extracts of soil-transmitted helminths and S. mansoni, and a 10-fold dilution series (100–10−3) of DNA extracted from a single S. haematobium egg (n=4). For clinical validation, the IGS-Sh-LAMP was tested on 125 DNA samples extracted from vaginal swabs of a previous FGS study in Madagascar. Results were compared with the quantification cycle value (Cq) of the standard ITS-2 targeting qPCR. Single S. haematobium egg DNA up to a 10–2 dilution and an ITS-2 Cq <35 tested positive in the IGS-Sh-LAMP. The specificity was found to be excellent (100%). In the clinical samples, IGS-Sh-LAMP showed comparable results with the qPCR, with 35.2% and 33.6% positives, respectively, and a concordance of 79.2% (99/125). Of the 12 false-negatives, 5 corresponded to the 7 qPCR positive samples with very low DNA levels (Cq ≥35). On the other hand, IGS-Sh-LAMP detected 14 additional cases that were not detected by qPCR. The T-cup IGS-Sh-LAMP performance was evaluated in a representative sub-selection (n=10) of IGS-Sh-LAMP positive clinical samples. The T-cup IGS-Sh-LAMP was found to be a very user-friendly method, but in different runs, it missed 1 to 4 of the 10 IGS-Sh-LAMP positive samples, specifically those with a low DNA load. Our results show that the IGS-Sh-LAMP is a suitable alternative to the ITS-2 qPCR for the diagnosis of FGS in gynaecological samples, with high potential for the T-cup as a fully instrument-free isothermal amplification device for point-of-care diagnosis in low-resource settings.","PeriodicalId":73098,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpara.2024.1297310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detection of Schistosoma spp. DNA in gynaecological samples by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is considered to be the reference diagnostic test for female genital schistosomiasis (FGS). However, qPCR needs expensive laboratory procedures and highly trained technicians. Loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) is a more field-friendly isothermal procedure for the detection of parasite-specific DNA, but it still requires electrically powered equipment. Here, we validated a Schistosoma haematobium-specific Sh-LAMP procedure and tested a fully instrument-free isothermal amplification using a novel low-cost, and reusable Temperature-cup (T-cup) device. Specific primers were selected based on published assays, targeting the ribosomal intergenic spacer (IGS) region of S. haematobium. Technical validation of the IGS-Sh-LAMP was performed using 20 negative controls, including DNA extracts of soil-transmitted helminths and S. mansoni, and a 10-fold dilution series (100–10−3) of DNA extracted from a single S. haematobium egg (n=4). For clinical validation, the IGS-Sh-LAMP was tested on 125 DNA samples extracted from vaginal swabs of a previous FGS study in Madagascar. Results were compared with the quantification cycle value (Cq) of the standard ITS-2 targeting qPCR. Single S. haematobium egg DNA up to a 10–2 dilution and an ITS-2 Cq <35 tested positive in the IGS-Sh-LAMP. The specificity was found to be excellent (100%). In the clinical samples, IGS-Sh-LAMP showed comparable results with the qPCR, with 35.2% and 33.6% positives, respectively, and a concordance of 79.2% (99/125). Of the 12 false-negatives, 5 corresponded to the 7 qPCR positive samples with very low DNA levels (Cq ≥35). On the other hand, IGS-Sh-LAMP detected 14 additional cases that were not detected by qPCR. The T-cup IGS-Sh-LAMP performance was evaluated in a representative sub-selection (n=10) of IGS-Sh-LAMP positive clinical samples. The T-cup IGS-Sh-LAMP was found to be a very user-friendly method, but in different runs, it missed 1 to 4 of the 10 IGS-Sh-LAMP positive samples, specifically those with a low DNA load. Our results show that the IGS-Sh-LAMP is a suitable alternative to the ITS-2 qPCR for the diagnosis of FGS in gynaecological samples, with high potential for the T-cup as a fully instrument-free isothermal amplification device for point-of-care diagnosis in low-resource settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性生殖器血吸虫病(FGS)护理点分子诊断的下一步:评估无仪器 LAMP 程序
通过实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测妇科样本中的血吸虫 DNA 被认为是女性生殖器血吸虫病(FGS)的参考诊断测试。然而,qPCR 需要昂贵的实验室程序和训练有素的技术人员。环路介导扩增(LAMP)是一种更适合现场检测寄生虫特异性 DNA 的等温扩增程序,但仍需要电力驱动设备。在这里,我们验证了血吸虫特异性 Sh-LAMP 程序,并使用新型低成本、可重复使用的温度杯(T-cup)装置测试了完全无需仪器的等温扩增。根据已发表的检测方法选择了特异引物,目标是血吸虫的核糖体基因间间隔(IGS)区域。IGS-Sh-LAMP 的技术验证使用了 20 个阴性对照,包括土壤传播蠕虫和曼森氏杆菌的 DNA 提取物,以及从单个血吸虫卵中提取的 DNA 的 10 倍稀释系列(100-10-3)(n=4)。为了进行临床验证,IGS-Sh-LAMP 在马达加斯加的一项 FGS 研究中对 125 份从阴道拭子中提取的 DNA 样品进行了测试。结果与标准 ITS-2 靶向 qPCR 的定量周期值 (Cq) 进行了比较。在 IGS-Sh-LAMP 中,稀释度达到 10-2 的单个血吸虫卵 DNA 和 ITS-2 Cq <35 的检测结果均为阳性。特异性极佳(100%)。在临床样本中,IGS-Sh-LAMP 与 qPCR 的结果相当,阳性率分别为 35.2% 和 33.6%,一致性为 79.2%(99/125)。在 12 个假阴性样本中,5 个与 7 个 DNA 含量极低(Cq ≥35)的 qPCR 阳性样本相对应。另一方面,IGS-Sh-LAMP 又检测到了 14 个 qPCR 未检测到的病例。在具有代表性的 IGS-Sh-LAMP 阳性临床样本子选择(n=10)中评估了 T-cup IGS-Sh-LAMP 的性能。我们发现 T-cup IGS-Sh-LAMP 是一种非常容易使用的方法,但在不同的运行中,它漏检了 10 个 IGS-Sh-LAMP 阳性样本中的 1 到 4 个,特别是那些 DNA 负载较低的样本。我们的研究结果表明,IGS-Sh-LAMP 是 ITS-2 qPCR 诊断妇科样本中 FGS 的合适替代方法,T-cup 作为一种完全免费的等温扩增设备,在低资源环境下用于床旁诊断具有很大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From laboratory to clinical practice: an update of the immunological and molecular tools for neurocysticercosis diagnosis Transcriptome analysis reveals molecular targets of erythrocyte invasion phenotype diversity in natural Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Cameroon Next step towards point-of-care molecular diagnosis of female genital schistosomiasis (FGS): evaluation of an instrument-free LAMP procedure In vitro and in vivo antimalarial activities of the ethanol extract of Erythrina sigmoidea stem bark used for the treatment of malaria in the Western Region of Cameroon Genetic variation of the Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein in parasite isolates from Homabay County in Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1