Independence of judges as a constitutional principle and deontological basis of the judicial profession

M. Gudyma
{"title":"Independence of judges as a constitutional principle and deontological basis of the judicial profession","authors":"M. Gudyma","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A permanent condition for the justice and effectiveness of the domestic judiciary composes the observance of the constitutional principles of its implementation, mainly the principle of independence, both in the aspect of the judicial system and in relation to the legal profession. The principle of independence of judges should be considered as a mega-principle that has its demonstration in legal, ideological, economic, social, and other aspects. It is through the prism of the first two of the notable ones that the work examines the principle of independence. \nHaving analyzed the legislative regulation and scientific approaches to the disclosure of the principle of independence, its dual nature is reasoned, the content of which is revealed through such a status of judges and the state of the judiciary as a whole, which provides for the implementation of judicial activity without any illegal influence, pressure or interference, but guided by the rule of law. It has been proven that the submission of judges to the rule of law acts as an additional guarantee of their independence and a reasonable limitation aimed at avoiding lawlessness and arbitrariness. \nHaving revealed the meaning of the constitutional principle of independence of judges, the publication draws attention to the deontological principles of judicial activity, it is substantiated that the internal imperatives of judicial ethics, the basis of which is the demand for independence, determine the main vectors of building relations between the judge and other participants in the judiciary, ensure his resistance to various temptations to depart from impartiality in the case in their own interests or the interests of other subjects. It has been proven that internal independence is an individual duty of each judge, which comes from the moral and ethical qualities of a specific person and forms necessary potential for the effectiveness of his activity. \nAfter analyzing the legal regulation, including the principles of moral culture of judges at the level of the Constitution, a conclusion was formulated regarding the need for legislative consolidation of the fundamental moral qualities of a candidate for the position of judge and their main characteristics, as well as the development of clear methods of their verification for the proper formation of the judicial corps and the effective implementation of the judiciary.","PeriodicalId":227965,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"101 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2024.02.123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A permanent condition for the justice and effectiveness of the domestic judiciary composes the observance of the constitutional principles of its implementation, mainly the principle of independence, both in the aspect of the judicial system and in relation to the legal profession. The principle of independence of judges should be considered as a mega-principle that has its demonstration in legal, ideological, economic, social, and other aspects. It is through the prism of the first two of the notable ones that the work examines the principle of independence. Having analyzed the legislative regulation and scientific approaches to the disclosure of the principle of independence, its dual nature is reasoned, the content of which is revealed through such a status of judges and the state of the judiciary as a whole, which provides for the implementation of judicial activity without any illegal influence, pressure or interference, but guided by the rule of law. It has been proven that the submission of judges to the rule of law acts as an additional guarantee of their independence and a reasonable limitation aimed at avoiding lawlessness and arbitrariness. Having revealed the meaning of the constitutional principle of independence of judges, the publication draws attention to the deontological principles of judicial activity, it is substantiated that the internal imperatives of judicial ethics, the basis of which is the demand for independence, determine the main vectors of building relations between the judge and other participants in the judiciary, ensure his resistance to various temptations to depart from impartiality in the case in their own interests or the interests of other subjects. It has been proven that internal independence is an individual duty of each judge, which comes from the moral and ethical qualities of a specific person and forms necessary potential for the effectiveness of his activity. After analyzing the legal regulation, including the principles of moral culture of judges at the level of the Constitution, a conclusion was formulated regarding the need for legislative consolidation of the fundamental moral qualities of a candidate for the position of judge and their main characteristics, as well as the development of clear methods of their verification for the proper formation of the judicial corps and the effective implementation of the judiciary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法官独立是宪法原则和司法职业的道义基础
国内司法机构的公正性和有效性的一个永久性条件是遵守宪法实施原则,主要是司法系统和法律职业方面的独立原则。法官独立原则应被视为一项巨型原则,在法律、意识形态、经济、社会和其他方面都有体现。本著作正是通过前两个显著原则的棱镜来研究独立性原则的。在分析了揭示独立原则的立法规定和科学方法后,对其双重性质进行了推理,其内容通过法官的这种地位和司法机关的整体状态得以揭示,这种地位和状态规定了司法活动的实施不受任何非法影响、压力或干涉,而是以法治为指导。事实证明,法官服从法治是对其独立性的额外保障,也是旨在避免无法无天和恣意妄为的合理限制。在揭示了法官独立这一宪法原则的含义之后,该出版物提请注意司法活动的道义原则,并证实司法伦理的内在要求(其基础是对独立性的要求)决定了法官与司法机构其他参与者之间建立关系的主要载体,确保法官抵制各种诱惑,不因自身利益或其他主体的利益而偏离案件的公正性。事实证明,内部独立是每名法官的个人职责,它来自于具体人员的道德和伦理素养,并形成其有效开展活动的必要潜能。在对《宪法》层面的法律规定,包括法官道德文化原则进行分析后,得出结论认为有必要通过立法巩固法官职位候选人的基本道德品质及其主要特征,并制定明确的核查方法,以正确组建司法队伍和有效实施司法制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Independence of judges as a constitutional principle and deontological basis of the judicial profession Corruption risks during public procurement in the conditions of military status The state of scientific development of the problems of criminal liability for gender-based violence in the context of armed conflict (martial law) in Ukraine in 2019-2022 Internal threats to the national security of Ukraine Financial assets in the system of financial legal relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1