A Comparison of Sentinel-1 Biased and Unbiased Coherence for Crop Monitoring and Classification

Qinxin Zhao, Qinghua Xie, Xing Peng, Yusong Bao, Tonglu Jia, Linwei Yue, Haiqiang Fu, Jianjun Zhu
{"title":"A Comparison of Sentinel-1 Biased and Unbiased Coherence for Crop Monitoring and Classification","authors":"Qinxin Zhao, Qinghua Xie, Xing Peng, Yusong Bao, Tonglu Jia, Linwei Yue, Haiqiang Fu, Jianjun Zhu","doi":"10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-2024-903-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) holds significant potential for applications in crop monitoring and classification. Interferometric SAR (InSAR) coherence proves effective in monitoring crop growth. Currently, the coherence based on the maximum likelihood estimator is biased towards low coherence values. Therefore, the main aim of this work is to access the performance of Sentinel-1 time-series biased coherence and unbiased coherence in crop monitoring and classification. This study was conducted during the 2018 growing season (April-October) in Komoka, an agricultural region in southwestern Ontario, Canada, primarily cultivating three crops: soybean, corn, and winter wheat. To verify the ability of coherence to monitor crops, a linear correlation coefficient between temporal coherence and dual polarimetric radar vegetation index (DpRVI) was fitted. The results revealed a stable correlation between temporal coherence and DpRVI time-series, with the highest correlation observed for soybean (0.7 < R < 0.8), followed by wheat and corn. Notably, unbiased coherence of the VV channel exhibited the highest correlation (R > 0.75). In addition, we applied unbiased coherence to crop classification. The results show that unbiased coherence exhibits very promising classification performance, with the overall accuracy (84.83%) and kappa coefficient (0.76) of VV improved by 8.35% and 0.12, respectively, over biased coherence, and the overall accuracy (73.25%) and kappa coefficient (0.57) of VH improved by 7.56% and 0.14, respectively, over biased coherence, and all crop classification accuracies were also effectively improved. This study demonstrates the feasibility of coherence monitoring of crops and provides new insights in enhancing the higher separability of crops.\n","PeriodicalId":505918,"journal":{"name":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","volume":"121 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-2024-903-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) holds significant potential for applications in crop monitoring and classification. Interferometric SAR (InSAR) coherence proves effective in monitoring crop growth. Currently, the coherence based on the maximum likelihood estimator is biased towards low coherence values. Therefore, the main aim of this work is to access the performance of Sentinel-1 time-series biased coherence and unbiased coherence in crop monitoring and classification. This study was conducted during the 2018 growing season (April-October) in Komoka, an agricultural region in southwestern Ontario, Canada, primarily cultivating three crops: soybean, corn, and winter wheat. To verify the ability of coherence to monitor crops, a linear correlation coefficient between temporal coherence and dual polarimetric radar vegetation index (DpRVI) was fitted. The results revealed a stable correlation between temporal coherence and DpRVI time-series, with the highest correlation observed for soybean (0.7 < R < 0.8), followed by wheat and corn. Notably, unbiased coherence of the VV channel exhibited the highest correlation (R > 0.75). In addition, we applied unbiased coherence to crop classification. The results show that unbiased coherence exhibits very promising classification performance, with the overall accuracy (84.83%) and kappa coefficient (0.76) of VV improved by 8.35% and 0.12, respectively, over biased coherence, and the overall accuracy (73.25%) and kappa coefficient (0.57) of VH improved by 7.56% and 0.14, respectively, over biased coherence, and all crop classification accuracies were also effectively improved. This study demonstrates the feasibility of coherence monitoring of crops and provides new insights in enhancing the higher separability of crops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于作物监测和分类的哨兵-1 有偏相干性和无偏相干性比较
摘要合成孔径雷达(SAR)在农作物监测和分类方面具有巨大的应用潜力。干涉合成孔径雷达(InSAR)的相干性证明可有效监测作物生长。目前,基于最大似然估计的相干性偏向于低相干性值。因此,这项工作的主要目的是了解哨兵-1 时间序列有偏相干性和无偏相干性在作物监测和分类中的性能。本研究于 2018 年生长季节(4 月至 10 月)在加拿大安大略省西南部的农业区科莫卡进行,主要种植三种作物:大豆、玉米和冬小麦。为验证相干性监测作物的能力,拟合了时间相干性与双偏振雷达植被指数(DpRVI)之间的线性相关系数。结果显示,时间相干性与 DpRVI 时间序列之间存在稳定的相关性,其中大豆的相关性最高(0.7 < R < 0.8),其次是小麦和玉米。值得注意的是,VV 通道的无偏相干性表现出最高的相关性(R > 0.75)。此外,我们还将无偏相干性应用于作物分类。结果表明,无偏相干性表现出非常好的分类性能,VV 的总体准确率(84.83%)和卡帕系数(0.76)比有偏相干性分别提高了 8.35% 和 0.12,VH 的总体准确率(73.25%)和卡帕系数(0.57)比有偏相干性分别提高了 7.56% 和 0.14,所有作物的分类准确率也都得到了有效提高。这项研究证明了农作物相干性监测的可行性,并为提高农作物的可分离性提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The 19th 3D GeoInfo Conference: Preface Archives Monitoring Time-Varying Changes of Historic Structures Through Photogrammetry-Driven Digital Twinning Multimedia Photogrammetry for Automated 3D Monitoring in Archaeological Waterlogged Wood Conservation Efficient Calculation of Multi-Scale Features for MMS Point Clouds Concepts for compensation of wave effects when measuring through water surfaces in photogrammetric applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1