The maintenance of complex visual scenes in working memory may require activation of working memory manipulation circuits in the dlPFC: A preliminary report

Frederick Nitchie, Abigail Casalvera, Marta Teferi, Milan Patel, Kevin G. Lynch, Walid Makhoul, Yvette I. Sheline, Nicholas L. Balderston
{"title":"The maintenance of complex visual scenes in working memory may require activation of working memory manipulation circuits in the dlPFC: A preliminary report","authors":"Frederick Nitchie,&nbsp;Abigail Casalvera,&nbsp;Marta Teferi,&nbsp;Milan Patel,&nbsp;Kevin G. Lynch,&nbsp;Walid Makhoul,&nbsp;Yvette I. Sheline,&nbsp;Nicholas L. Balderston","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Past research has shown that the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (dlPFC) are implicated in both emotional processing as well as cognitive processing,<sup>1,2,3</sup> in addition to working memory<sup>4, 5</sup>. Exactly how these disparate processes interact with one another within the dlPFC is less understood. To explore this, we designed a task that looked at working memory performance during fMRI under both emotional and nonemotional conditions, and tested it in this preliminary report. Participants were asked to complete three tasks (letters, neutral images, emotional images) of the Sternberg Sorting Task under one of two trial conditions (sort or maintain). Regions of interest consisted of the left and right dlPFC as defined by brain masks based on NeuroSynth<sup>6</sup>. Results showed a significant main effect of the ‘sort’ condition on reaction speed for all three trial types, as well as a main effect of task type (letters) on accuracy. In addition, a significant interaction was found between trial type (sort) and task type (letters), but not for either of the picture tasks. Although preliminary, these results reveal a discrepancy between BOLD signal and behavioral data, with no significant difference in BOLD activity during image trials being displayed, despite longer response times for every condition. While these initial results show that the dlPFC is implicated in nonemotional cognitive processing, more research is needed to explain the lack of BOLD activation seen here for similar emotionally valanced tasks, possibly indicating the involvement of other brain networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.61","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past research has shown that the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (dlPFC) are implicated in both emotional processing as well as cognitive processing,1,2,3 in addition to working memory4, 5. Exactly how these disparate processes interact with one another within the dlPFC is less understood. To explore this, we designed a task that looked at working memory performance during fMRI under both emotional and nonemotional conditions, and tested it in this preliminary report. Participants were asked to complete three tasks (letters, neutral images, emotional images) of the Sternberg Sorting Task under one of two trial conditions (sort or maintain). Regions of interest consisted of the left and right dlPFC as defined by brain masks based on NeuroSynth6. Results showed a significant main effect of the ‘sort’ condition on reaction speed for all three trial types, as well as a main effect of task type (letters) on accuracy. In addition, a significant interaction was found between trial type (sort) and task type (letters), but not for either of the picture tasks. Although preliminary, these results reveal a discrepancy between BOLD signal and behavioral data, with no significant difference in BOLD activity during image trials being displayed, despite longer response times for every condition. While these initial results show that the dlPFC is implicated in nonemotional cognitive processing, more research is needed to explain the lack of BOLD activation seen here for similar emotionally valanced tasks, possibly indicating the involvement of other brain networks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要在工作记忆中保持复杂的视觉场景,可能需要激活大脑前部皮层的工作记忆操纵回路:初步报告
过去的研究表明,双侧背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)与情绪处理和认知处理1,2,3 以及工作记忆4,5 都有关系。这些不同的过程究竟如何在前额叶皮质内相互作用,目前还不太清楚。为了探究这个问题,我们设计了一项任务,考察在情绪和非情绪条件下的 fMRI 工作记忆表现,并在本初步报告中进行了测试。我们要求受试者在两种试验条件(排序或保持)之一下完成斯腾伯格排序任务的三个任务(字母、中性图像、情绪图像)。研究区域包括基于 NeuroSynth6 的脑掩膜所定义的左右大脑前交叉区域(dlPFC)。结果表明,在所有三种试验类型中,"排序 "条件对反应速度有明显的主效应,任务类型(字母)对准确性也有明显的主效应。此外,试验类型(排序)和任务类型(字母)之间存在明显的交互作用,但对图片任务没有影响。这些结果虽然是初步的,但揭示了 BOLD 信号和行为数据之间的差异,尽管每种条件下的反应时间都较长,但在图像试验中显示的 BOLD 活动没有明显差异。虽然这些初步结果表明,dlPFC 与非情绪认知处理有关联,但还需要更多的研究来解释为什么在类似的情绪估值任务中缺乏 BOLD 激活,这可能表明有其他大脑网络参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The simultaneous impact of interventions on optimism and depression: A meta-analysis Social sharing and expressive suppression in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder: An experience sampling study Predictors of preoperative anxiety in pediatric surgical patients in Ghana: A bi-center study Using passive and active data to predict posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and cannabis use in recently discharged UK veterans: A protocol for the MAVERICK feasibility study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1