A comparison between geomembrane-sand tests and machine learning predictions

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Geosynthetics International Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1680/jgein.23.00016
A. T. Tanga, G. L. Silva Araújo, F. Evangelista Junior
{"title":"A comparison between geomembrane-sand tests and machine learning predictions","authors":"A. T. Tanga, G. L. Silva Araújo, F. Evangelista Junior","doi":"10.1680/jgein.23.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interaction between soils and geosynthetics plays an important role in the applications of these materials for reinforcement in geotechnical engineering. The complexities of soil-geosynthetic interactions vary depending on the type and properties of both the geosynthetic and the soil. This paper introduces a machine learning approach, specifically a random forest algorithm, for predicting interface friction angles. The dataset comprises 495 interfaces involving geomembranes and sand, with fourteen influencing parameters recorded for each interface, influencing the shear strength outcome. In the analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient is employed to measure the linear interdependence between each pair of input-input and input-output variables. Following the linear regression analysis, an optimized random forest is utilized to project the interface friction angle. The random forest algorithm divides the selected data into training and testing sets, and only 3% of the training set and 6% of the testing set exceed ±5° from the actual records. The coefficient of determination (R2) indicates strong agreement between the predicted and laboratory study friction angles, with R2 = 0.93 for the training set and R2 = 0.92 for the testing set. Consequently, the random forest algorithm demonstrates effectiveness in predicting interface friction angles.","PeriodicalId":12616,"journal":{"name":"Geosynthetics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosynthetics International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.23.00016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interaction between soils and geosynthetics plays an important role in the applications of these materials for reinforcement in geotechnical engineering. The complexities of soil-geosynthetic interactions vary depending on the type and properties of both the geosynthetic and the soil. This paper introduces a machine learning approach, specifically a random forest algorithm, for predicting interface friction angles. The dataset comprises 495 interfaces involving geomembranes and sand, with fourteen influencing parameters recorded for each interface, influencing the shear strength outcome. In the analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient is employed to measure the linear interdependence between each pair of input-input and input-output variables. Following the linear regression analysis, an optimized random forest is utilized to project the interface friction angle. The random forest algorithm divides the selected data into training and testing sets, and only 3% of the training set and 6% of the testing set exceed ±5° from the actual records. The coefficient of determination (R2) indicates strong agreement between the predicted and laboratory study friction angles, with R2 = 0.93 for the training set and R2 = 0.92 for the testing set. Consequently, the random forest algorithm demonstrates effectiveness in predicting interface friction angles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土工膜-砂测试与机器学习预测的比较
土壤与土工合成材料之间的相互作用在岩土工程中加固材料的应用中起着重要作用。土壤与土工合成材料相互作用的复杂性因土工合成材料和土壤的类型和性质而异。本文介绍了一种预测界面摩擦角的机器学习方法,特别是随机森林算法。数据集包括 495 个涉及土工膜和沙子的界面,每个界面记录了 14 个影响剪切强度结果的影响参数。在分析中,采用了皮尔逊相关系数来衡量每一对输入-输入和输入-输出变量之间的线性相互依存关系。线性回归分析之后,利用优化的随机森林来预测界面摩擦角。随机森林算法将所选数据分为训练集和测试集,只有 3% 的训练集和 6% 的测试集的数据与实际记录偏差超过 ±5°。判定系数(R2)表明,预测的摩擦角与实验室研究的摩擦角非常一致,训练集的 R2 = 0.93,测试集的 R2 = 0.92。由此可见,随机森林算法在预测界面摩擦角方面非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geosynthetics International
Geosynthetics International ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An online only, rapid publication journal, Geosynthetics International – an official journal of the International Geosynthetics Society (IGS) – publishes the best information on current geosynthetics technology in research, design innovation, new materials and construction practice. Topics covered The whole of geosynthetic materials (including natural fibre products) such as research, behaviour, performance analysis, testing, design, construction methods, case histories and field experience. Geosynthetics International is received by all members of the IGS as part of their membership, and is published in e-only format six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the mechanical response of recovered geogrids under repeated loading Factors affecting the tensile strength of bituminous geomembrane seams Centrifuge modeling of levees with geocomposite chimney drain subjected to flooding Selection of long-term shear strength parameters for strain softening geosynthetic interfaces (2023 IGS Rowe Lecture) A comparison between geomembrane-sand tests and machine learning predictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1