The influence of accent and device usage on perceived credibility during interactions with voice-AI assistants

Anne Pycha, Georgia Zellou
{"title":"The influence of accent and device usage on perceived credibility during interactions with voice-AI assistants","authors":"Anne Pycha, Georgia Zellou","doi":"10.3389/fcomp.2024.1411414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voice-AI assistants offer innovative ways for people to interact with technology, such as delivering search results through human-sounding voices. Unlike printed text, however, voices are associated with particular characteristics, such as accents, which have the potential to influence perceived credibility. Voice-AI assistants are also a relatively new phenomenon, and while people who use them frequently may be inclined to trust them, other people may not be. The current study investigated how voice accent and frequency-of-use affected users’ credibility assessments of search results delivered by voice-AI assistants. Participants, who were native speakers of American English and self-classified themselves according to how frequently they used voice-AI assistants, listened to statements produced by neural text-to-speech in either an American English or British English accent. They then rated the credibility of both the information content and the voice itself, along several dimensions. Results showed that in multiple conditions, participants perceived information delivered by British-accented voices as more credible than that delivered by American English-accented voices. Furthermore, frequency-of-use exerted a significant effect on perceived trustworthiness of a voice. These findings have implications for the ethical design of voice-AI systems, and for human-computer interaction more generally.","PeriodicalId":510141,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Computer Science","volume":" 66","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1411414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voice-AI assistants offer innovative ways for people to interact with technology, such as delivering search results through human-sounding voices. Unlike printed text, however, voices are associated with particular characteristics, such as accents, which have the potential to influence perceived credibility. Voice-AI assistants are also a relatively new phenomenon, and while people who use them frequently may be inclined to trust them, other people may not be. The current study investigated how voice accent and frequency-of-use affected users’ credibility assessments of search results delivered by voice-AI assistants. Participants, who were native speakers of American English and self-classified themselves according to how frequently they used voice-AI assistants, listened to statements produced by neural text-to-speech in either an American English or British English accent. They then rated the credibility of both the information content and the voice itself, along several dimensions. Results showed that in multiple conditions, participants perceived information delivered by British-accented voices as more credible than that delivered by American English-accented voices. Furthermore, frequency-of-use exerted a significant effect on perceived trustworthiness of a voice. These findings have implications for the ethical design of voice-AI systems, and for human-computer interaction more generally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在与人工智能语音助手互动时,口音和设备使用对感知可信度的影响
语音人工智能助手为人们提供了与技术互动的创新方式,例如通过人声提供搜索结果。然而,与印刷文本不同的是,语音带有口音等特定特征,有可能影响人们对其可信度的感知。语音人工智能助手也是一种相对较新的现象,虽然经常使用它们的人可能会倾向于信任它们,但其他人可能不会。本研究调查了语音口音和使用频率如何影响用户对语音人工智能助手提供的搜索结果的可信度评估。以美式英语为母语并根据使用语音人工智能助手的频率进行自我分类的参与者聆听了神经文本到语音以美式英语或英式英语口音生成的语句。然后,他们从多个维度对信息内容和语音本身的可信度进行评分。结果表明,在多种条件下,与美式英语口音的语音相比,英式口音的语音所提供的信息更可信。此外,使用频率对声音的可信度也有显著影响。这些发现对语音人工智能系统的道德设计以及更广泛的人机交互都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cybersecurity for Industry 5.0: trends and gaps Device-enabled neighborhood-slot allocation for the edge-oriented Internet of Things High-quality implementation for a continuous-in-time financial API in C# Editorial: HCI and worker well-being Extracting typing game keystroke patterns as potential indicators of programming aptitude
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1