Livelihood Trajectories of Rural Young People in Southern Africa: Stuck in Loops?

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development and Change Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1111/dech.12826
Flora Hajdu, Lorraine van Blerk, Nicola Ansell, Roeland Hemsteede, Evance Mwathunga, Thandie Hlabana, Elsbeth Robson
{"title":"Livelihood Trajectories of Rural Young People in Southern Africa: Stuck in Loops?","authors":"Flora Hajdu,&nbsp;Lorraine van Blerk,&nbsp;Nicola Ansell,&nbsp;Roeland Hemsteede,&nbsp;Evance Mwathunga,&nbsp;Thandie Hlabana,&nbsp;Elsbeth Robson","doi":"10.1111/dech.12826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attempts to boost rural development in the Global South tend to focus on ways in which people can transform their lives. Interventions are often designed to help overcome specific envisioned constraints and push individuals onto a pathway out of poverty. Research has contributed to nuancing this vision by documenting the non-linearity of pathways, which often results in people being left in limbo or stuck, rather than moving forward. Based on a study in two villages in Malawi and Lesotho, this article argues that even these nuances do not fully capture the real-life experiences of the 63 young people who participated. Interviews tracing the course of their lives between 2007–08 and 2016–17 reveal trajectories that are circular rather than linear, and show the detrimental effects of being stuck in these frustrating loops of taking action without progressing. Conceptualizing rural young people's livelihood trajectories in contexts of severe poverty as loops highlights the structural issues that need to be addressed if their lives are to be transformed. Understanding development as emancipation from sources of unfreedom means focusing on the structural constraints that keep some people in poverty, and the importance of attaining agency if they are to put their needs on the agenda and demand basic rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"55 3","pages":"465-492"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dech.12826","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dech.12826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attempts to boost rural development in the Global South tend to focus on ways in which people can transform their lives. Interventions are often designed to help overcome specific envisioned constraints and push individuals onto a pathway out of poverty. Research has contributed to nuancing this vision by documenting the non-linearity of pathways, which often results in people being left in limbo or stuck, rather than moving forward. Based on a study in two villages in Malawi and Lesotho, this article argues that even these nuances do not fully capture the real-life experiences of the 63 young people who participated. Interviews tracing the course of their lives between 2007–08 and 2016–17 reveal trajectories that are circular rather than linear, and show the detrimental effects of being stuck in these frustrating loops of taking action without progressing. Conceptualizing rural young people's livelihood trajectories in contexts of severe poverty as loops highlights the structural issues that need to be addressed if their lives are to be transformed. Understanding development as emancipation from sources of unfreedom means focusing on the structural constraints that keep some people in poverty, and the importance of attaining agency if they are to put their needs on the agenda and demand basic rights.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南部非洲农村年轻人的生计轨迹:陷入循环?
促进全球南部农村发展的努力往往侧重于人们改变生活的方式。干预措施往往旨在帮助克服所设想的具体限制因素,推动个人走上脱贫之路。研究通过记录路径的非线性,对这一设想进行了细化,这往往导致人们陷入困境或停滞不前,而不是向前迈进。本文基于对马拉维和莱索托两个村庄的研究,认为即使是这些细微差别也不能完全反映 63 名参与研究的年轻人的真实经历。对他们在 2007-08 年至 2016-17 年间生活轨迹的访谈显示,他们的生活轨迹是循环而非线性的,并显示了陷入这些令人沮丧的循环而不思进取所带来的有害影响。将农村青年在严重贫困背景下的生活轨迹概念化为循环,凸显了要改变他们的生活就必须解决的结构性问题。将发展理解为从不自由的根源中解放出来,意味着要重点关注使一些人陷入贫困的结构性制约因素,以及如果他们要将自己的需求提上日程并要求获得基本权利,获得代理权的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The Political Economy of Reparations and the Dialectic of Transnational Capitalism Mobilized Resilience and Development under Sanctions in Iran A Critical Framing of Data for Development: Historicizing Data Relations and AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1