Heterogeneous effects of Medicaid expansion on food security measures

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY American Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1111/ajae.12471
Anne T. Byrne, Bhagyashree Katare, John Lowrey
{"title":"Heterogeneous effects of Medicaid expansion on food security measures","authors":"Anne T. Byrne, Bhagyashree Katare, John Lowrey","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2014 Affordable Care Act (ACA) included state‐level Medicaid expansion programs, which have been credited with gains in food security for low‐income, able‐bodied, childless adults without dependents (ABAWDs). Yet, ABAWDs represent a diverse cohort who experience disparities along racial and ethnic lines, which could be partly responsible for differences in health‐related outcomes. This study uses data from the Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement to estimate the heterogeneous effect of ACA Medicaid expansion on food security among ABAWDs by race, ethnicity, and income. We find that Medicaid expansion improved food security for households headed by White ABAWDs—particularly those with incomes above 50% of the federal poverty line—but we do not find similarly significant evidence of gains among some historically marginalized populations. We find weak evidence that suggests that households headed by Hispanic ABAWDs may have experienced gains. However, Black‐headed ABAWD households had significantly worse food insecurity relative to the pooled sample of all races and ethnicities. Our results suggest that the relationship between healthcare access and food security is complex and, although spillover effects from a change in healthcare policy can influence food security status, such effects may not be equitably distributed across race, ethnicity, or income.","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2014 Affordable Care Act (ACA) included state‐level Medicaid expansion programs, which have been credited with gains in food security for low‐income, able‐bodied, childless adults without dependents (ABAWDs). Yet, ABAWDs represent a diverse cohort who experience disparities along racial and ethnic lines, which could be partly responsible for differences in health‐related outcomes. This study uses data from the Current Population Survey Food Security Supplement to estimate the heterogeneous effect of ACA Medicaid expansion on food security among ABAWDs by race, ethnicity, and income. We find that Medicaid expansion improved food security for households headed by White ABAWDs—particularly those with incomes above 50% of the federal poverty line—but we do not find similarly significant evidence of gains among some historically marginalized populations. We find weak evidence that suggests that households headed by Hispanic ABAWDs may have experienced gains. However, Black‐headed ABAWD households had significantly worse food insecurity relative to the pooled sample of all races and ethnicities. Our results suggest that the relationship between healthcare access and food security is complex and, although spillover effects from a change in healthcare policy can influence food security status, such effects may not be equitably distributed across race, ethnicity, or income.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大医疗补助计划对粮食安全措施的不同影响
2014 年《平价医疗法案》(ACA)包括州一级的医疗补助扩展计划,该计划为低收入、身体健康、无子女、无受抚养人的成年人(ABAWDs)提高了食品安全。然而,ABAWDs 代表了一个多样化的群体,他们在种族和民族方面存在差异,这可能是造成健康相关结果差异的部分原因。本研究利用《当前人口调查食品安全补编》中的数据,按种族、民族和收入估算了《美国医疗补助法案》(ACA)的扩大对美国无自理能力者食品安全的不同影响。我们发现,《医疗补助计划》的扩展改善了以白人为户主的澳大利亚残疾人家庭的食品安全状况,尤其是那些收入高于联邦贫困线 50%的家庭,但我们没有发现类似的显著证据表明一些历史上被边缘化的人群的食品安全状况有所改善。我们发现有微弱的证据表明,西班牙裔美国家庭经济支柱残疾人的户主家庭可能获得了收益。然而,与所有种族和民族的综合样本相比,以黑人为户主的亚裔美国人和残疾人家庭的粮食不安全状况要严重得多。我们的研究结果表明,医疗保健的可及性与食品安全之间的关系非常复杂,尽管医疗保健政策的变化所产生的溢出效应会影响食品安全状况,但这种效应可能不会在不同种族、族裔或收入之间公平分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Integration of the US cannabis market Regulatory decentralization and food safety: evidence from China Issue Information Change in farmer expectations from information surprises in the corn market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1