Swarm and UNOISE outperform DADA2 and Deblur for denoising high-diversity marine seafloor samples

IF 5.1 Q1 ECOLOGY ISME communications Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycae071
Tonje Nilsen, L. Snipen, I. Angell, N. B. Keeley, Sanna Majaneva, Ragnhild Pettersen, Knut Rudi
{"title":"Swarm and UNOISE outperform DADA2 and Deblur for denoising high-diversity marine seafloor samples","authors":"Tonje Nilsen, L. Snipen, I. Angell, N. B. Keeley, Sanna Majaneva, Ragnhild Pettersen, Knut Rudi","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The performance of sequence variant resolution analytic tools for metabarcoding has not yet been adequately benchmarked for high-diversity environmental samples. We therefore evaluated the sequence variant tools DADA2, Deblur, Swarm and UNOISE, using high-diversity seafloor samples, resulting in comparisons of 1800 sequence variant tables. The evaluation was based on 30 sediment grab samples, for which three replica samples were collected. Each replica sample was extracted using five common DNA extraction kits, resulting in 450 DNA extracts which were 16S rRNA gene sequenced (V3-V4), using Illumina. Assessments included variation across replica samples, extraction kits and denoising methods, in addition to applying prior knowledge about alpha diversity correlations towards the cosmopolitan marine archaeon Nitrosopumilus with high diversity, and the sulfide oxidizing Sulfurovum with low diversity. DADA2 displayed the highest variance between replicates (Manhattan distance 1.14), while Swarm showed the lowest variance (Manhattan distance 0.93). For the analysis based on prior biological knowledge, UNOISE displayed the highest alpha diversity (Simpson’s D) correlation towards Nitrosopumilus (Spearman rho = 0.85), while DADA2 showed the lowest (Spearman rho = 0.10). Deblur completely eliminated Nitrosopumilus from the dataset. For Sulfurovum, on the other hand, all the methods showed comparable results. In conclusion, our evaluations show that Swarm and UNOISE performed better than DADA2 and Deblur for high-diversity seafloor samples.","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycae071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of sequence variant resolution analytic tools for metabarcoding has not yet been adequately benchmarked for high-diversity environmental samples. We therefore evaluated the sequence variant tools DADA2, Deblur, Swarm and UNOISE, using high-diversity seafloor samples, resulting in comparisons of 1800 sequence variant tables. The evaluation was based on 30 sediment grab samples, for which three replica samples were collected. Each replica sample was extracted using five common DNA extraction kits, resulting in 450 DNA extracts which were 16S rRNA gene sequenced (V3-V4), using Illumina. Assessments included variation across replica samples, extraction kits and denoising methods, in addition to applying prior knowledge about alpha diversity correlations towards the cosmopolitan marine archaeon Nitrosopumilus with high diversity, and the sulfide oxidizing Sulfurovum with low diversity. DADA2 displayed the highest variance between replicates (Manhattan distance 1.14), while Swarm showed the lowest variance (Manhattan distance 0.93). For the analysis based on prior biological knowledge, UNOISE displayed the highest alpha diversity (Simpson’s D) correlation towards Nitrosopumilus (Spearman rho = 0.85), while DADA2 showed the lowest (Spearman rho = 0.10). Deblur completely eliminated Nitrosopumilus from the dataset. For Sulfurovum, on the other hand, all the methods showed comparable results. In conclusion, our evaluations show that Swarm and UNOISE performed better than DADA2 and Deblur for high-diversity seafloor samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在对高分辨率海洋海底样本进行去噪处理方面,Swarm 和 UNOISE 优于 DADA2 和 Deblur
用于代谢标码的序列变异解析分析工具的性能尚未针对高多样性环境样本进行充分的基准测试。因此,我们使用高多样性海底样本对序列变异工具 DADA2、Deblur、Swarm 和 UNOISE 进行了评估,得出了 1800 个序列变异表的比较结果。评估以 30 个沉积物抓取样本为基础,并收集了三个副本样本。使用五种常见的 DNA 提取试剂盒对每个副本样本进行提取,最终得到 450 份 DNA 提取物,并使用 Illumina 对这些提取物进行 16S rRNA 基因测序(V3-V4)。评估包括不同复制样本、提取试剂盒和去噪方法之间的差异,此外还应用了有关阿尔法多样性相关性的先验知识,包括多样性较高的世界性海洋古生物 Nitrosopumilus 和多样性较低的硫化物氧化型 Sulfurovum。DADA2 重复间的方差最大(曼哈顿距离为 1.14),而 Swarm 重复间的方差最小(曼哈顿距离为 0.93)。在基于先验生物知识的分析中,UNOISE 与 Nitrosopumilus 的阿尔法多样性(辛普森 D)相关性最高(Spearman rho = 0.85),而 DADA2 的相关性最低(Spearman rho = 0.10)。Deblur 完全消除了数据集中的 Nitrosopumilus。而对于 Sulfurovum,所有方法的结果都相当。总之,我们的评估结果表明,对于高多样性的海底样本,Swarm 和 UNOISE 的性能优于 DADA2 和 Deblur。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metagenomic insights into inhibition of soil microbial carbon metabolism by phosphorus limitation during vegetation succession. Introduction into natural environments shifts the gut microbiome of captivity-raised filter-feeding bivalves. Metagenomic and -transcriptomic analyses of microbial nitrogen transformation potential, and gene expression in Swiss lake sediments. Biological and experimental factors that define the effectiveness of microbial inoculation on plant traits: a meta-analysis. Rhizospheric miRNAs affect the plant microbiota.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1