Imagining the End of Official Social Work: Thinking Beyond the Possible and Probable

Oliver Brockmann
{"title":"Imagining the End of Official Social Work: Thinking Beyond the Possible and Probable","authors":"Oliver Brockmann","doi":"10.1093/bjsw/bcae065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article seeks to critically engage Chris Maylea’s 2020 provocative call to end official social work by suggesting that the debate it sparked has the potential to expand the contemporary social work discourse. This article explores the complexities and potential dangers of Maylea’s radical call, particularly its susceptibility to co-option by neo-conservative agendas. Whilst the idea of calling for the end of official social work may seem absurd, the article maintains that it might serve as an intellectual tool to overcome the ‘imaginary inertia’ that arguably plagues discussions about reforming the profession. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s concept of ‘episteme’ and Gaston Bachelard’s ‘categories of the real’, it suggests that Maylea’s call for abolition challenges the established boundaries of what is considered possible and probable in the critical social work discourse. This might open new avenues that might otherwise remain invisible to reimagine the future of the profession. Consequently, it is posited that imagining the end of official social work may align with and expand opposing calls for reformation of the profession.","PeriodicalId":510024,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Social Work","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcae065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to critically engage Chris Maylea’s 2020 provocative call to end official social work by suggesting that the debate it sparked has the potential to expand the contemporary social work discourse. This article explores the complexities and potential dangers of Maylea’s radical call, particularly its susceptibility to co-option by neo-conservative agendas. Whilst the idea of calling for the end of official social work may seem absurd, the article maintains that it might serve as an intellectual tool to overcome the ‘imaginary inertia’ that arguably plagues discussions about reforming the profession. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s concept of ‘episteme’ and Gaston Bachelard’s ‘categories of the real’, it suggests that Maylea’s call for abolition challenges the established boundaries of what is considered possible and probable in the critical social work discourse. This might open new avenues that might otherwise remain invisible to reimagine the future of the profession. Consequently, it is posited that imagining the end of official social work may align with and expand opposing calls for reformation of the profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
想象官方社会工作的终结:超越可能与可能的思考
本文试图批判性地探讨克里斯-梅里亚 2020 年发出的结束官方社会工作的挑衅性呼吁,认为其引发的辩论有可能扩大当代社会工作的讨论范围。本文探讨了梅里亚激进呼吁的复杂性和潜在危险,尤其是其被新保守主义议程收编的可能性。虽然呼吁终结官方社会工作的想法看似荒谬,但文章认为,它可以作为一种智力工具,克服 "想象中的惰性",这种惰性可能会困扰有关社会工作改革的讨论。文章借鉴米歇尔-福柯(Michel Foucault)的 "认识论"(episteme)概念和加斯东-巴谢拉(Gaston Bachelard)的 "现实范畴"(categories of the real),认为梅雷亚关于废除官方社会工作的呼吁挑战了批判性社会工作讨论中被认为是可能和可能的既定界限。这可能会为重新想象社会工作专业的未来开辟新的途径,否则这些途径可能会被忽视。因此,我们认为,想象官方社会工作的终结可能会与反对改革社会工作专业的呼声相一致,并扩大这种呼声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voices of Refugee Families from Ukraine Currently Living in the Czech Republic Psychological Protective and Risk Factors for Depression, Anxiety and Mental Well-Being in Social Workers Ethnic Disproportionality in the Child Welfare System: A Welsh Linked Administrative Data Study for 2011–2020 Unpaid Care Work Time and Women’s Employment Status: Evidence from India Disaster Preparedness in Social Work: Enhancing Policy in Australian Human Service Organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1