Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Different Meat Samples in Baghdad City

M. Hadid, A. B. Al-Shaibani, Mohammad Al-Halbosiy
{"title":"Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Different Meat Samples in Baghdad City","authors":"M. Hadid, A. B. Al-Shaibani, Mohammad Al-Halbosiy","doi":"10.24126/jobrc.2024.18.1.713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The occurrence of Gram-negative (G -ve) bacteria in meat samples raises a major concern due to the possibility of drug resistance incidence since G -ve bacteria have built-in resistance mechanisms and can pass on genetic elements that enable other bacterial species to develop into drug-resistant as well. This drug resistance could be transferred to consumers through a food-borne route. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria in meat samples as well as to detect their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Methods: For this purpose, 100 meat samples (ground meat, raw burgers, frozen chicken, and chicken carcasses) were collected, and obtained isolates were identified using conventional microbiological techniques including cultural and microscopic identification. After that antibiotic susceptibility patterns were detected using Kirby Bauer's disc diffusion method. Results: Results showed that 91 of the samples were harboring Gram-negative bacteria and E.coli was the most common isolate (51.64%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.68%) while the least common isolate was each of E. coli O157:H7, Aeromonas hydrophila, Kluyvera spp., Raoultella terrigena, Hafnia alvei, and Serratia marcescens (1.10%). Susceptibility test showed that all isolates were susceptible to Meropenem and Imipenem while Ampicillin was the most resisted antibiotic. Conclusion: We conclude that meat samples harbor numerous pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria which showed antibiotic-resistant ability toward most tested drugs. However, Meropenem and Imipenem were the least resisted drugs which makes them an appropriate choice for the treatment of foodborne infections.","PeriodicalId":15122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biotechnology Research Center","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biotechnology Research Center","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24126/jobrc.2024.18.1.713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The occurrence of Gram-negative (G -ve) bacteria in meat samples raises a major concern due to the possibility of drug resistance incidence since G -ve bacteria have built-in resistance mechanisms and can pass on genetic elements that enable other bacterial species to develop into drug-resistant as well. This drug resistance could be transferred to consumers through a food-borne route. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of Gram-negative bacteria in meat samples as well as to detect their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Methods: For this purpose, 100 meat samples (ground meat, raw burgers, frozen chicken, and chicken carcasses) were collected, and obtained isolates were identified using conventional microbiological techniques including cultural and microscopic identification. After that antibiotic susceptibility patterns were detected using Kirby Bauer's disc diffusion method. Results: Results showed that 91 of the samples were harboring Gram-negative bacteria and E.coli was the most common isolate (51.64%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (18.68%) while the least common isolate was each of E. coli O157:H7, Aeromonas hydrophila, Kluyvera spp., Raoultella terrigena, Hafnia alvei, and Serratia marcescens (1.10%). Susceptibility test showed that all isolates were susceptible to Meropenem and Imipenem while Ampicillin was the most resisted antibiotic. Conclusion: We conclude that meat samples harbor numerous pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria which showed antibiotic-resistant ability toward most tested drugs. However, Meropenem and Imipenem were the least resisted drugs which makes them an appropriate choice for the treatment of foodborne infections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴格达市不同肉类样本中分离出的革兰氏阴性菌的流行率和抗生素敏感性
背景:肉类样本中出现革兰氏阴性(G -ve)细菌引起了人们的极大关注,因为 G -ve细菌具有内在的抗药性机制,并能通过遗传因子使其他细菌物种也产生抗药性。这种耐药性可通过食物传播途径转移给消费者。本研究旨在评估肉类样本中革兰氏阴性菌的流行情况,并检测它们对抗生素的敏感性模式。研究方法为此,收集了 100 份肉类样本(碎肉、生汉堡、冷冻鸡肉和鸡肉尸体),并使用传统微生物学技术(包括培养和显微镜鉴定)对获得的分离菌进行了鉴定。然后使用 Kirby Bauer 盘扩散法检测抗生素敏感性模式。结果显示结果表明,91 份样本中含有革兰氏阴性菌,最常见的分离菌是大肠杆菌(51.64%),其次是肺炎克雷伯菌(18.68%),而最不常见的分离菌分别是大肠杆菌 O157:H7、嗜水气单胞菌、Kluyvera spp.、Raoultella terrigena、Hafnia alvei 和 Serratia marcescens(1.10%)。药敏试验显示,所有分离菌株都对美罗培南和亚胺培南敏感,而氨苄西林是抗药性最强的抗生素。结论我们得出的结论是,肉类样本中存在大量致病性革兰氏阴性菌,这些细菌对大多数测试药物具有抗药性。不过,美罗培南和亚胺培南是抗药性最低的药物,因此是治疗食源性感染的合适选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review Article: DNA Methylation in Cancer Immunity Extracellular Endoglucanase and Exoglucanase Enzymes Production by Trichoderma viride Utilizing Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) in liquid fermentation Environmental and Health Impact of Heavy Metal Accumulation in (Hair - Nails) of Scavenger Workers at Some Landfill Sites in Baghdad City-Iraq Morphological and Histopathological Liver Abnormalities Caused by Carbamazepine-Induced Injury in Female Albino Mice Impact of Some Immunological Parameters (antioxidant – cytokines) in Cutaneous leishmaniasis in a Sample of Patients in the Al-Ramadi City.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1