Obstetric Outcomes of Eritrean Immigrants in Switzerland: A Comparative Study

R. M. Erhardt, Kristen Jafflin, N. Zepro, Charles Abongomera, A. Chernet, Daniel H. Paris, Sonja Merten
{"title":"Obstetric Outcomes of Eritrean Immigrants in Switzerland: A Comparative Study","authors":"R. M. Erhardt, Kristen Jafflin, N. Zepro, Charles Abongomera, A. Chernet, Daniel H. Paris, Sonja Merten","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2024.1606745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aims to compare obstetric outcomes between Eritrean and Swiss women in Switzerland, focusing on instrumental or surgical interventions and analgesia use.Methods: The study included data from 45,412 Swiss and 1,132 Eritrean women who gave birth in Swiss hospitals (2019–2022). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery and analgesia use and multinomial mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery in women intended for spontaneous vaginal delivery.Results: Compared with Swiss, Eritrean women had a lower rate of primary C-section (Adj. OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.89]) but a higher risk of initially planned vaginal deliveries ending in emergency C-section (RRR 1.31, 95% CI [1.05, 1.63]). Eritrean women were less likely to receive epidural analgesia (Adj. OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.62]) and more likely to not receive any analgesia (Adj. OR 1.73, 95% CI [1.52, 1.96]).Conclusion: This study reveals disparities in obstetric care, notably in higher emergency C-section rates and lower analgesia use among Eritrean women. For promoting equitable healthcare practices deeper understanding of obstetrics decision-making is needed.","PeriodicalId":504643,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1606745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare obstetric outcomes between Eritrean and Swiss women in Switzerland, focusing on instrumental or surgical interventions and analgesia use.Methods: The study included data from 45,412 Swiss and 1,132 Eritrean women who gave birth in Swiss hospitals (2019–2022). Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery and analgesia use and multinomial mixed-effects logistic regression to assess the effect of nationality on mode of delivery in women intended for spontaneous vaginal delivery.Results: Compared with Swiss, Eritrean women had a lower rate of primary C-section (Adj. OR 0.73, 95% CI [0.60, 0.89]) but a higher risk of initially planned vaginal deliveries ending in emergency C-section (RRR 1.31, 95% CI [1.05, 1.63]). Eritrean women were less likely to receive epidural analgesia (Adj. OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.62]) and more likely to not receive any analgesia (Adj. OR 1.73, 95% CI [1.52, 1.96]).Conclusion: This study reveals disparities in obstetric care, notably in higher emergency C-section rates and lower analgesia use among Eritrean women. For promoting equitable healthcare practices deeper understanding of obstetrics decision-making is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士厄立特里亚移民的产科结果:比较研究
目的:本研究旨在比较瑞士和厄立特里亚妇女的产科结果:本研究旨在比较瑞士境内厄立特里亚妇女和瑞士妇女的产科结果,重点关注器械或手术干预以及镇痛的使用情况:研究纳入了在瑞士医院分娩的 45,412 名瑞士妇女和 1,132 名厄立特里亚妇女的数据(2019-2022 年)。采用混合效应逻辑回归评估国籍对分娩方式和镇痛使用的影响,采用多项式混合效应逻辑回归评估国籍对阴道自然分娩产妇分娩方式的影响:与瑞士产妇相比,厄立特里亚产妇的初次剖腹产率较低(Adj. OR 0.73,95% CI [0.60,0.89]),但最初计划的阴道分娩最终导致紧急剖腹产的风险较高(RRR 1.31,95% CI [1.05,1.63])。厄立特里亚产妇接受硬膜外镇痛的可能性较低(Adj. OR 0.53, 95% CI [0.45, 0.62]),而不接受任何镇痛的可能性较高(Adj. OR 1.73, 95% CI [1.52, 1.96]):这项研究揭示了产科护理方面的差异,尤其是厄立特里亚妇女的紧急剖腹产率较高,镇痛使用率较低。为了促进公平的医疗保健实践,需要加深对产科决策的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dietary Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Related to Obesity and Highly Underweight Among Urban Chinese High School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study Breast Cancer Awareness and Screening Perceptions of Women in Yerevan, Armenia Experiences of Food Insecurity Among Pregnant Adolescents and Adolescent Mothers in Ghana: A Photovoice Method Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Ability of Children to Recognize Basic Emotions Critical Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Abuse and Its Impact on Healthy Work Environments in Five European Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1