Guiding the Implementation of Wastewater-based Surveillance for Carceral Infection Control with Perspectives from People with Lived Experience of Incarceration during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Victoria M. Brown, Emily A. Ogutu, Alexandra E. Kauffman, Shanika S. Kennedy, Rebecca A. Tenner, A. Wurcel, Chad J. Zawitz, Anne C Spaulding, Matthew J. Akiyama
{"title":"Guiding the Implementation of Wastewater-based Surveillance for Carceral Infection Control with Perspectives from People with Lived Experience of Incarceration during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Victoria M. Brown, Emily A. Ogutu, Alexandra E. Kauffman, Shanika S. Kennedy, Rebecca A. Tenner, A. Wurcel, Chad J. Zawitz, Anne C Spaulding, Matthew J. Akiyama","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4214768/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Little guidance exists on best practices for implementing and sustaining wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) for SARS-CoV-2 in carceral settings. To ensure alignment with priorities of stakeholders, we aimed to understand the perspectives of persons with lived experience (PLE) of jail who were incarcerated during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic on infection control. Methods We recruited two PLE at each of four jails: Cook County (IL), Fulton County (GA), Middlesex County (MA), and Washington DC. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) guides followed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Two FGDs focusing on lived experience with jail infection control protocol and WBS were conducted, and six Key Informant (KI) interviews followed to gain insights on communicating WBS results. We used a combination of deductive thematic analysis based on CFIR constructs and inductive analysis to capture emergent themes. Results Themes from FGDs included: (1) variable experiences with COVID-19 infection control protocols including intake processes, individual testing, isolation and quarantine, (2) the perceived attitudes of fellow residents and staff surrounding COVID-19 mitigation in a carceral setting; and (3) perceived benefits and challenges involving WBS implementation and messaging. KIs emphasized 1) The importance of straightforward health messaging and trustworthiness in the communication of WBS results, 2) Support for enhanced health education around outbreaks, and 3) Receptiveness to WBS being used as a tool to measure common infectious agents (i.e., influenza) but hesitancy regarding its application to conditions such as HIV and illicit drug use. PLE articulated support of robust infection control programs and receptiveness to expanding WBS if conducted in a non-stigmatizing manner. Conclusion Perspectives from PLE can help shape the infection control programs for future outbreaks and inform the expansion of WBS implementation in carceral facilities. It will be important to consider the voices of current and former residents, as receivers of care, to promote an environment conducive to comprehensive infection control. In addition to having infection control programs consistently execute set protocols and educate all stakeholders, PLE identified collaboration between jail staff and residents, and clear communication around program expectations as priorities. Findings from this qualitative study can be shared with jail decision makers and the perceived engagement of stakeholders can be measured.","PeriodicalId":21039,"journal":{"name":"Research Square","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4214768/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Little guidance exists on best practices for implementing and sustaining wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) for SARS-CoV-2 in carceral settings. To ensure alignment with priorities of stakeholders, we aimed to understand the perspectives of persons with lived experience (PLE) of jail who were incarcerated during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic on infection control. Methods We recruited two PLE at each of four jails: Cook County (IL), Fulton County (GA), Middlesex County (MA), and Washington DC. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) guides followed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Two FGDs focusing on lived experience with jail infection control protocol and WBS were conducted, and six Key Informant (KI) interviews followed to gain insights on communicating WBS results. We used a combination of deductive thematic analysis based on CFIR constructs and inductive analysis to capture emergent themes. Results Themes from FGDs included: (1) variable experiences with COVID-19 infection control protocols including intake processes, individual testing, isolation and quarantine, (2) the perceived attitudes of fellow residents and staff surrounding COVID-19 mitigation in a carceral setting; and (3) perceived benefits and challenges involving WBS implementation and messaging. KIs emphasized 1) The importance of straightforward health messaging and trustworthiness in the communication of WBS results, 2) Support for enhanced health education around outbreaks, and 3) Receptiveness to WBS being used as a tool to measure common infectious agents (i.e., influenza) but hesitancy regarding its application to conditions such as HIV and illicit drug use. PLE articulated support of robust infection control programs and receptiveness to expanding WBS if conducted in a non-stigmatizing manner. Conclusion Perspectives from PLE can help shape the infection control programs for future outbreaks and inform the expansion of WBS implementation in carceral facilities. It will be important to consider the voices of current and former residents, as receivers of care, to promote an environment conducive to comprehensive infection control. In addition to having infection control programs consistently execute set protocols and educate all stakeholders, PLE identified collaboration between jail staff and residents, and clear communication around program expectations as priorities. Findings from this qualitative study can be shared with jail decision makers and the perceived engagement of stakeholders can be measured.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以 COVID-19 大流行期间有监禁经历者的视角指导实施基于废水的监测以控制殡葬感染
摘要 背景 关于在监狱环境中实施和维持基于废水的 SARS-CoV-2 监控 (WBS) 的最佳实践指导很少。为确保与利益相关者的优先事项保持一致,我们旨在了解在 COVID-19 大流行期间被监禁的监狱亲历者 (PLE) 对感染控制的看法。方法 我们在四所监狱各招募了两名 PLE:库克县(伊利诺伊州)、富尔顿县(佐治亚州)、米德尔塞克斯县(马萨诸塞州)和华盛顿特区。焦点小组讨论 (FGD) 指南遵循实施研究综合框架 (CFIR)。我们进行了两次 FGD,重点讨论了监狱感染控制协议和 WBS 的生活经验,随后进行了六次关键知情人 (KI) 访谈,以了解 WBS 结果的传播情况。我们结合使用了基于 CFIR 结构的演绎式主题分析和归纳式分析来捕捉新出现的主题。结果 FGD 的主题包括(1) 对 COVID-19 感染控制协议的不同体验,包括入院流程、个人检测、隔离和检疫;(2) 在囚禁环境中,居民和工作人员对减轻 COVID-19 感染的认知态度;(3) 对 WBS 实施和信息传达方面的益处和挑战的认知。KIs 强调:1)在传达 WBS 结果时,直截了当的健康信息和可信度非常重要;2)支持围绕疾病暴发加强健康教育;3)接受将 WBS 用作测量常见传染病病原体(如流感)的工具,但对其是否适用于 HIV 和非法使用毒品等情况犹豫不决。PLE 明确表示支持强有力的感染控制计划,并接受以非污名化的方式扩大 WBS 的应用范围。结论 PLE 的观点有助于为未来的疫情爆发制定感染控制计划,并为在囚禁设施中扩大 WBS 的实施范围提供信息。重要的是要考虑到作为护理接受者的现任和前任居民的意见,以促进有利于全面感染控制的环境。除了让感染控制项目始终如一地执行既定协议并对所有利益相关者进行教育外,PLE 还将监狱工作人员与居民之间的合作以及围绕项目期望的明确沟通确定为优先事项。这项定性研究的结果可与监狱决策者分享,并可衡量利益相关者的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structure of METTL3-METTL14 with an m6A nucleotide reveals insights into m6A conversion and sensing. Combination of a MIP3α-antigen fusion therapeutic DNA vaccine with treatments of IFNα and 5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine enhances activated effector CD8+ T cells expressing CD11c in the B16F10 melanoma model. Disparity in temporal and spatial relationships between resting-state electrophysiological and fMRI signals. Acute sympathetic activation blunts the hyperemic and vasodilatory response to passive leg movement Pharmacological PINK1 activation ameliorates Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1