The MTIST platform: a microbiome time series inference standardized test

Jonas Schluter, Grant A. Hussey, João Valeriano, Chenzhen Zhang, Alexis Sullivan, David Fenyö
{"title":"The MTIST platform: a microbiome time series inference standardized test","authors":"Jonas Schluter, Grant A. Hussey, João Valeriano, Chenzhen Zhang, Alexis Sullivan, David Fenyö","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4343683/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The human gut microbiome is a promising therapeutic target, but interventions are hampered by our limited understanding of microbial ecosystems. Here, we present a platform to develop, evaluate, and score approaches to learn ecological interactions from microbiome time series data. The microbiome time series inference standardized test (MTIST) comprises: a simulation framework for the in silico generation of microbiome study data akin to what is obtained with quantitative next-generation sequencing approaches, a compilation of a large curated data set generated by the simulation framework representing 648 simulated microbiome studies containing 18,360 time series, with a total of 2,182,800 species abundance measurements, and a scoring method to rank ecological inference algorithms. We use the MTIST platform to rank five implementations of microbiome inference approaches, revealing that while all algorithms performed well on ecosystems with few species (3 and 10), all algorithms failed to infer most interaction in a large ecosystem with 100 member species. However, we do find that the strongest interactions within a large ecosystem are inferred with higher success by all algorithms. Finally, we use the MTIST platform to compare different microbiome study designs, characterizing tradeoffs between samples per subject and number of subjects. Interestingly, we find that when only few samples can be collected per subject, ecological inference is most successful when these samples are collected with highest feasible temporal frequency. Taken together, we provide a computational tool to aid the development of better microbiome ecosystem inference approaches, which will be crucial towards the development of reliable and predictable therapeutic approaches that target the microbiome ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":21039,"journal":{"name":"Research Square","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4343683/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The human gut microbiome is a promising therapeutic target, but interventions are hampered by our limited understanding of microbial ecosystems. Here, we present a platform to develop, evaluate, and score approaches to learn ecological interactions from microbiome time series data. The microbiome time series inference standardized test (MTIST) comprises: a simulation framework for the in silico generation of microbiome study data akin to what is obtained with quantitative next-generation sequencing approaches, a compilation of a large curated data set generated by the simulation framework representing 648 simulated microbiome studies containing 18,360 time series, with a total of 2,182,800 species abundance measurements, and a scoring method to rank ecological inference algorithms. We use the MTIST platform to rank five implementations of microbiome inference approaches, revealing that while all algorithms performed well on ecosystems with few species (3 and 10), all algorithms failed to infer most interaction in a large ecosystem with 100 member species. However, we do find that the strongest interactions within a large ecosystem are inferred with higher success by all algorithms. Finally, we use the MTIST platform to compare different microbiome study designs, characterizing tradeoffs between samples per subject and number of subjects. Interestingly, we find that when only few samples can be collected per subject, ecological inference is most successful when these samples are collected with highest feasible temporal frequency. Taken together, we provide a computational tool to aid the development of better microbiome ecosystem inference approaches, which will be crucial towards the development of reliable and predictable therapeutic approaches that target the microbiome ecosystem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MTIST 平台:微生物组时间序列推断标准化测试
摘要 人类肠道微生物组是一个很有前景的治疗目标,但由于我们对微生物生态系统的了解有限,干预措施受到了阻碍。在此,我们提出了一个平台,用于开发、评估和评分从微生物组时间序列数据中学习生态相互作用的方法。微生物组时间序列推断标准化测试(MTIST)包括:一个模拟框架,用于在硅生成微生物组研究数据,类似于通过定量下一代测序方法获得的数据;一个由模拟框架生成的大型数据集汇编,该数据集代表了 648 项模拟微生物组研究,包含 18,360 个时间序列,共计 2,182,800 个物种丰度测量值;以及一种评分方法,用于对生态推断算法进行排名。我们利用 MTIST 平台对微生物组推断方法的五种实施方案进行了排名,结果发现,虽然所有算法在物种较少(3 种和 10 种)的生态系统中都表现良好,但在有 100 个成员物种的大型生态系统中,所有算法都无法推断出大多数相互作用。不过,我们确实发现,所有算法都能较成功地推断出大型生态系统中最强的相互作用。最后,我们利用 MTIST 平台比较了不同的微生物组研究设计,分析了每个研究对象的样本数与研究对象数量之间的权衡。有趣的是,我们发现当每个研究对象只能采集少量样本时,如果以最高的可行时间频率采集这些样本,生态推断的成功率最高。综上所述,我们提供了一种计算工具来帮助开发更好的微生物组生态系统推断方法,这对开发针对微生物组生态系统的可靠、可预测的治疗方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disparity in temporal and spatial relationships between resting-state electrophysiological and fMRI signals. Acute sympathetic activation blunts the hyperemic and vasodilatory response to passive leg movement Pharmacological PINK1 activation ameliorates Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease models Blink-related arousal network surges are shaped by cortical vigilance states Radiomics-Based Predictive Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1