{"title":"Scientific Utility of Selected Latin American Global Geoparks: A Literature-Based Case Study","authors":"D. Ruban, N. Yashalova","doi":"10.3390/geosciences14050128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global geoparks, i.e., the members of the UNESCO Global Geopark (UGGp) network, possess highly valuable geoheritage resources, which can be used for the purposes of not only education and tourism, but also science. Five examples from four Latin American countries (Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru) were employed to realize the importance of these global geoparks as facilitators of international research. Journal articles devoted to these geoparks were selected with the major bibliographical databases, and the information from them was analyzed quantitatively. Particularly, the numbers of articles published before and after the UGGp membership, paying significant and marginal attention to geoparks, and published by international teams were calculated; the general themes of the articles were outlined. It was established that the total number of publications grew after the UGGp membership of these geoparks, but not steadily. The established dynamics of publishing are unstable and differ between the geoparks. Geoparks of Mexico (Mixteca Alta) and Peru (Colca y Volcanes de Andagua) are notable examples because they started to facilitate international research before the UGGp membership. Many articles consider geoparks only marginally (nonetheless, there are also articles paying significant attention to geoparks, especially in the cases of two Mexican geoparks). The author teams are often not restricted to Latin America. The research themes are rather diverse (geoheritage, geology, ecology, innovations, society, technology), although the majority of the publications are geoheritage-focused. Of special interest is the Colca y Volcanes de Andagua global geopark, which has been considered in the innovation-focused article. Generally, our results indicate a moderate importance of the considered global geoparks to international research activity and the incomplete exploitation of their scientific potential. Two Mexican geoparks (Comarca Minera and Mixteca Alta) seem to be the most successful in the facilitation of international research. Indeed, the scientific utility of global geoparks should be strengthened.","PeriodicalId":509137,"journal":{"name":"Geosciences","volume":" 122","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14050128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global geoparks, i.e., the members of the UNESCO Global Geopark (UGGp) network, possess highly valuable geoheritage resources, which can be used for the purposes of not only education and tourism, but also science. Five examples from four Latin American countries (Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru) were employed to realize the importance of these global geoparks as facilitators of international research. Journal articles devoted to these geoparks were selected with the major bibliographical databases, and the information from them was analyzed quantitatively. Particularly, the numbers of articles published before and after the UGGp membership, paying significant and marginal attention to geoparks, and published by international teams were calculated; the general themes of the articles were outlined. It was established that the total number of publications grew after the UGGp membership of these geoparks, but not steadily. The established dynamics of publishing are unstable and differ between the geoparks. Geoparks of Mexico (Mixteca Alta) and Peru (Colca y Volcanes de Andagua) are notable examples because they started to facilitate international research before the UGGp membership. Many articles consider geoparks only marginally (nonetheless, there are also articles paying significant attention to geoparks, especially in the cases of two Mexican geoparks). The author teams are often not restricted to Latin America. The research themes are rather diverse (geoheritage, geology, ecology, innovations, society, technology), although the majority of the publications are geoheritage-focused. Of special interest is the Colca y Volcanes de Andagua global geopark, which has been considered in the innovation-focused article. Generally, our results indicate a moderate importance of the considered global geoparks to international research activity and the incomplete exploitation of their scientific potential. Two Mexican geoparks (Comarca Minera and Mixteca Alta) seem to be the most successful in the facilitation of international research. Indeed, the scientific utility of global geoparks should be strengthened.
全球地质公园,即教科文组织全球地质公园(UGGp)网络的成员,拥有非常宝贵的地 质遗产资源,不仅可用于教育和旅游目的,还可用于科学目的。通过四个拉丁美洲国家(智利、厄瓜多尔、墨西哥和秘鲁)的五个实例,我们认识到了这些全球地质公园作为国际研究促进者的重要性。从主要的文献数据库中选取了有关这些地质公园的期刊文章,并对其中的信息进行了定量分析。特别是计算了在加入 UGGp 之前和之后发表的文章数量、对地质公园的重要关注和次要关注以及由国际团队发表的文章数量,并概述了这些文章的一般主题。结果表明,在这些地质公园加入 UGGp 之后,发表文章的总数有所增加,但并不稳定。已确定的出版动态并不稳定,各地质公园之间也存在差异。墨西哥地质公园(Mixteca Alta)和秘鲁地质公园(Colca y Volcanes de Andagua)是明显的例子,因为它们在加入地质公园联盟之前就开始促进国际研究。许多文章对地质公园只是略加考虑(尽管如此,也有一些文章对地质公园给予了极大的关注,特别是墨西哥的两个地质公园)。作者团队通常不局限于拉丁美洲。研究主题相当多样(地质遗产、地质学、生态学、创新、社会、技术),尽管大多数出版物都以地质遗产为重点。特别值得关注的是科尔卡和安达瓜火山(Colca y Volcanes de Andagua)世界地质公园,这篇文章以创新为重点。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,所考虑的全球地质公园对国际研究活动的重要性一般,其科学潜力尚未得到充分开发。两个墨西哥地质公园(Comarca Minera 和 Mixteca Alta)在促进国际研究方面似乎最为成功。事实上,应加强全球地质公园的科学效用。