Shiyin Sha, A. Dyson, Gholamreza Kefayati, A. Tolooiyan
{"title":"Analysis of Debris Flow Protective Barriers Using the Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian Method","authors":"Shiyin Sha, A. Dyson, Gholamreza Kefayati, A. Tolooiyan","doi":"10.3390/geosciences14080198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protective structures play a vital role in mitigating the risks associated with debris flows, yet assessing their performance poses crucial challenges for their real-world effectiveness. This study proposes a comprehensive procedure for evaluating the performance of protective structures exposed to impacts from media transported by large debris flow events. The method combines numerical modelling with site conditions for existing structures along the Hobart Rivulet in Tasmania, Australia. The Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) model was validated by comparing simulation results with experimental data, demonstrating high agreement. Utilising three-dimensional modelling of debris flow–boulder interactions over the Hobart Rivulet terrain, boulder velocities were estimated for subsequent finite element analyses. Importantly, a model of interaction between boulders and I-beam posts was established, facilitating a comparative assessment of five distinct I-beam barrier systems defined as Type A to E, which are currently in use at the site. Simulation results reveal larger boulders display a slower increase in their velocities over the 3D terrain. Introducing a key metric, the failure ratio, enable a mechanism for comparative assessments of these barrier systems. Notably, the Type E barriers demonstrate superior performance due to fewer weak points within the structure. The combined CEL and FE assessments allow for multiple aspects of the interactions between debris flows, boulders, and structures to be considered, including structural failure and deformability, to enhance the understanding of debris flow risk mitigation in Tasmania.","PeriodicalId":509137,"journal":{"name":"Geosciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14080198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Protective structures play a vital role in mitigating the risks associated with debris flows, yet assessing their performance poses crucial challenges for their real-world effectiveness. This study proposes a comprehensive procedure for evaluating the performance of protective structures exposed to impacts from media transported by large debris flow events. The method combines numerical modelling with site conditions for existing structures along the Hobart Rivulet in Tasmania, Australia. The Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) model was validated by comparing simulation results with experimental data, demonstrating high agreement. Utilising three-dimensional modelling of debris flow–boulder interactions over the Hobart Rivulet terrain, boulder velocities were estimated for subsequent finite element analyses. Importantly, a model of interaction between boulders and I-beam posts was established, facilitating a comparative assessment of five distinct I-beam barrier systems defined as Type A to E, which are currently in use at the site. Simulation results reveal larger boulders display a slower increase in their velocities over the 3D terrain. Introducing a key metric, the failure ratio, enable a mechanism for comparative assessments of these barrier systems. Notably, the Type E barriers demonstrate superior performance due to fewer weak points within the structure. The combined CEL and FE assessments allow for multiple aspects of the interactions between debris flows, boulders, and structures to be considered, including structural failure and deformability, to enhance the understanding of debris flow risk mitigation in Tasmania.
防护结构在降低与泥石流相关的风险方面发挥着至关重要的作用,然而,对其性能进行评估却对其在现实世界中的有效性提出了严峻的挑战。本研究提出了一套全面的程序,用于评估受到大型泥石流事件传播介质影响的防护结构的性能。该方法将数值建模与澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州霍巴特河口沿岸现有结构的现场条件相结合。通过将模拟结果与实验数据进行比较,对耦合欧拉格拉格朗日(CEL)模型进行了验证,结果表明两者具有很高的一致性。利用霍巴特河口地形上泥石流与巨石相互作用的三维模型,对巨石速度进行了估算,以便进行后续的有限元分析。重要的是,建立了巨石与工字钢柱之间的相互作用模型,有助于对目前在现场使用的 A 至 E 型五种不同的工字钢护栏系统进行比较评估。模拟结果显示,较大的巨石在三维地形上的速度增加较慢。通过引入一个关键指标--故障率,可以对这些护栏系统进行比较评估。值得注意的是,由于结构中的薄弱点较少,E 型护栏表现出更优越的性能。结合 CEL 和 FE 评估,可以从多个方面考虑泥石流、巨石和结构之间的相互作用,包括结构失效和变形能力,从而加深对塔斯马尼亚泥石流风险缓解的理解。