ChatGPT from the students' point of view – Lessons from a pilot study using ChatGPT in business higher education

Q2 Social Sciences Society and Economy Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1556/204.2024.00007
András Kétyi, Zsuzsanna Géring, Ildikó Dén-Nagy
{"title":"ChatGPT from the students' point of view – Lessons from a pilot study using ChatGPT in business higher education","authors":"András Kétyi, Zsuzsanna Géring, Ildikó Dén-Nagy","doi":"10.1556/204.2024.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent pilot study, we examined the potential benefits and opportunities that ChatGPT can bring to higher education, particularly from the perspective of business students and educators. The study included 41 participants and aimed to explore their opinions on using ChatGPT in business language classes. Twelve students did not use ChatGPT during the course (control group), while 29 students used it actively (experimental group). Examining their experiences and comparing the two groups, it is evident that students see the benefits and disadvantages of ChatGPT and use it for tasks they find helpful. However, the practice and hands-on experience helped the experimental group members gain much more diverse and nuanced opinions about ChatGPT. These results underline that universities and their boards must embrace the technology and find reasonable areas to use ChatGPT. These may not only be connected to assignment forms and plagiarism, but can embrace more general topics, like equal eligibility to these new technologies or strengthening the students' social and emotional intelligence and skills to help their future lives.","PeriodicalId":40049,"journal":{"name":"Society and Economy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2024.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a recent pilot study, we examined the potential benefits and opportunities that ChatGPT can bring to higher education, particularly from the perspective of business students and educators. The study included 41 participants and aimed to explore their opinions on using ChatGPT in business language classes. Twelve students did not use ChatGPT during the course (control group), while 29 students used it actively (experimental group). Examining their experiences and comparing the two groups, it is evident that students see the benefits and disadvantages of ChatGPT and use it for tasks they find helpful. However, the practice and hands-on experience helped the experimental group members gain much more diverse and nuanced opinions about ChatGPT. These results underline that universities and their boards must embrace the technology and find reasonable areas to use ChatGPT. These may not only be connected to assignment forms and plagiarism, but can embrace more general topics, like equal eligibility to these new technologies or strengthening the students' social and emotional intelligence and skills to help their future lives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从学生的角度看 ChatGPT - 在商科高等教育中使用 ChatGPT 的试点研究的经验教训
在最近的一项试点研究中,我们考察了 ChatGPT 能为高等教育带来的潜在益处和机遇,尤其是从商科学生和教育工作者的角度来看。这项研究包括 41 名参与者,旨在探索他们对在商务语言课上使用 ChatGPT 的看法。其中 12 名学生在课程中没有使用 ChatGPT(对照组),29 名学生积极使用 ChatGPT(实验组)。通过对两组学生的体验和比较,可以看出学生们看到了 ChatGPT 的优点和缺点,并在他们认为有帮助的任务中使用了 ChatGPT。然而,通过实践和亲身体验,实验组成员对 ChatGPT 的看法更加多样化和细致入微。这些结果表明,大学及其董事会必须接受这项技术,并找到使用 ChatGPT 的合理领域。这些领域可能不仅仅与作业形式和剽窃有关,还可以包括更广泛的话题,如平等使用这些新技术的资格,或加强学生的社会和情感智力和技能,以帮助他们未来的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Society and Economy
Society and Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The double-blind peer-reviewed journal publishes original research articles and book reviews in the fields of economics, social sciences, and business studies, which address social and economic issues in Central and Eastern Europe or have relevance for social and economic development in this region. While it welcomes articles from the international academic community, Society and Economy seeks in particular to provide an international forum for scholars working in the research traditions of this region. The journal welcomes submissions of high-quality and multi-disciplinary articles that address social, demographic, political, economic and industrial trends and challenges. Society and Economy is a gold open access journal since 2019 but authors are not requested to pay an article processing fee.
期刊最新文献
How can nature and nurture influence teleworkers: The influence of national culture and personal traits on job satisfaction ChatGPT from the students' point of view – Lessons from a pilot study using ChatGPT in business higher education Exposure and preparedness for wartime inflation in the EU: Retrospective cluster analysis Distribution and use of tax support for housing in the Czech Republic The effect of review quality on purchase intention in cross-border e-commerce: The case of Hungary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1