Personality and Self-efficacy for Illness Management in Cancer

Tristen Peyser, Laura M. Perry, Brenna Mossman, Kenneth Xu, Seowoo Kim, James B. Moran, Michael Hoerger
{"title":"Personality and Self-efficacy for Illness Management in Cancer","authors":"Tristen Peyser, Laura M. Perry, Brenna Mossman, Kenneth Xu, Seowoo Kim, James B. Moran, Michael Hoerger","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4289523/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Self-efficacy for illness management is increasingly recognized as important for outcomes in cancer. We examined whether The Big Five personality dimensions were associated with self-efficacy for illness management and hypothesized that patients who were less neurotic and more conscientious would have better self-efficacy. Methods Adults with cancer completed a cross-sectional survey that included the Mini-International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) and three subscales of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Chronic Conditions: managing emotions, managing symptoms, and managing treatment and medication. Linear regressions were used to test the hypotheses, while controlling for covariates. Results The personality and PROMIS self-efficacy measures demonstrated good evidence of reliability (median Cronbach’s alpha = .78, range of .69-.92) and validity (intercorrelations). As hypothesized, patients who were less neurotic or more conscientious had higher levels of illness self-efficacy overall and on each of the three subscales (all p s < .001). Openness was associated with better self-management of symptoms ( p  = .013) and emotions ( p  = .040). Extraversion was associated with better self-management of emotions ( p  = .024). Conclusions Personality plays a vital role in illness self-efficacy for patients with cancer. Practice Implications: As a part of multidisciplinary care teams, psychosocial experts can use these findings to help patients better manage their illness.","PeriodicalId":21039,"journal":{"name":"Research Square","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4289523/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Self-efficacy for illness management is increasingly recognized as important for outcomes in cancer. We examined whether The Big Five personality dimensions were associated with self-efficacy for illness management and hypothesized that patients who were less neurotic and more conscientious would have better self-efficacy. Methods Adults with cancer completed a cross-sectional survey that included the Mini-International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) and three subscales of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Chronic Conditions: managing emotions, managing symptoms, and managing treatment and medication. Linear regressions were used to test the hypotheses, while controlling for covariates. Results The personality and PROMIS self-efficacy measures demonstrated good evidence of reliability (median Cronbach’s alpha = .78, range of .69-.92) and validity (intercorrelations). As hypothesized, patients who were less neurotic or more conscientious had higher levels of illness self-efficacy overall and on each of the three subscales (all p s < .001). Openness was associated with better self-management of symptoms ( p  = .013) and emotions ( p  = .040). Extraversion was associated with better self-management of emotions ( p  = .024). Conclusions Personality plays a vital role in illness self-efficacy for patients with cancer. Practice Implications: As a part of multidisciplinary care teams, psychosocial experts can use these findings to help patients better manage their illness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者的个性和疾病管理自我效能感
摘要 目的 越来越多的人认识到,疾病管理的自我效能对癌症的治疗效果非常重要。我们研究了大五人格维度是否与疾病管理自我效能感相关,并假设神经质较少和较自觉的患者会有更好的自我效能感。方法 患有癌症的成年人完成了一项横断面调查,其中包括小型国际人格项目库(IPIP)和患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)慢性病自我效能的三个分量表:管理情绪、管理症状以及管理治疗和药物。在控制协变量的同时,采用线性回归对假设进行检验。结果 人格和 PROMIS 自我效能感测量结果显示出良好的信度(Cronbach's alpha 中位数 = .78,范围为 .69-.92)和效度(相互关系)。正如假设的那样,神经质较少或较有良知的患者在总体上和三个分量表中的每个分量表上都具有较高的疾病自我效能感水平(所有 p s < .001)。开放性与更好的症状自我管理(p = .013)和情绪自我管理(p = .040)相关。外向性与更好的情绪自我管理相关(p = .024)。结论 人格在癌症患者的疾病自我效能感中发挥着重要作用。实践意义:作为多学科护理团队的一部分,社会心理专家可以利用这些研究结果帮助患者更好地管理自己的疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disparity in temporal and spatial relationships between resting-state electrophysiological and fMRI signals. Acute sympathetic activation blunts the hyperemic and vasodilatory response to passive leg movement Pharmacological PINK1 activation ameliorates Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease models Blink-related arousal network surges are shaped by cortical vigilance states Radiomics-Based Predictive Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1