Farm digital tools: A systematic review of investments and environmental implications

Maha Ben Jaballah, M. Ghali, Nejla Ben Arfa, Karine Daniel, G. Kleftodimos, A. Ridier
{"title":"Farm digital tools: A systematic review of investments and environmental implications","authors":"Maha Ben Jaballah, M. Ghali, Nejla Ben Arfa, Karine Daniel, G. Kleftodimos, A. Ridier","doi":"10.25082/ree.2023.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Farm-level investment in digital tools is often viewed as a necessary part of the agroecological transition. However, its actual relevance remains unclear due to currently ambiguous definitions of farm investments in general and equipment investments in particular. We conducted a systematic review of the farm investment literature to characterize the different categories of digital tools investments seen and to determine how often the environment is considered in this field of research. A total of 131 articles met our eligibility criteria and were subject to further analysis. First, we found that research on farm investments has looked at general farm investments, investments in combined factors of production, and investments in specific factors of production. Second, we discovered that there are four main investment categories for farm equipment (including digital tools). Third, we noted that few studies have addressed the environmental implications of investing in digital tools. Our findings emphasize that, to facilitate the agroecological transition, it will be important to promote broader strategies that encourage farmers to invest in digital tools.","PeriodicalId":436007,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Environmental Economics","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Environmental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25082/ree.2023.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farm-level investment in digital tools is often viewed as a necessary part of the agroecological transition. However, its actual relevance remains unclear due to currently ambiguous definitions of farm investments in general and equipment investments in particular. We conducted a systematic review of the farm investment literature to characterize the different categories of digital tools investments seen and to determine how often the environment is considered in this field of research. A total of 131 articles met our eligibility criteria and were subject to further analysis. First, we found that research on farm investments has looked at general farm investments, investments in combined factors of production, and investments in specific factors of production. Second, we discovered that there are four main investment categories for farm equipment (including digital tools). Third, we noted that few studies have addressed the environmental implications of investing in digital tools. Our findings emphasize that, to facilitate the agroecological transition, it will be important to promote broader strategies that encourage farmers to invest in digital tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农场数字化工具:对投资和环境影响的系统审查
农场对数字工具的投资通常被视为农业生态转型的必要组成部分。然而,由于目前对农场投资尤其是设备投资的定义不明确,其实际相关性仍不清楚。我们对农场投资文献进行了系统性回顾,以描述所见数字工具投资的不同类别,并确定环境在这一研究领域中被考虑的频率。共有 131 篇文章符合我们的资格标准,并接受了进一步分析。首先,我们发现有关农场投资的研究涉及一般农场投资、综合生产要素投资和特定生产要素投资。其次,我们发现农场设备(包括数字工具)有四大投资类别。第三,我们注意到很少有研究涉及数字工具投资对环境的影响。我们的研究结果强调,为促进农业生态转型,必须推广更广泛的战略,鼓励农民投资数字工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy audit for biodiesel performance Farm digital tools: A systematic review of investments and environmental implications The performance of mixed and penalized effects models in predicting the value of the ecological footprint of tourism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1