Initial investigation of kinesiophobia as a predictor of functional reaction time one year after concussion

Q3 Medicine Concussion Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.2217/cnc-2023-0014
Melissa Anderson, Robert C Lynall, Patrick J O'Connor, Julianne D Schmidt
{"title":"Initial investigation of kinesiophobia as a predictor of functional reaction time one year after concussion","authors":"Melissa Anderson, Robert C Lynall, Patrick J O'Connor, Julianne D Schmidt","doi":"10.2217/cnc-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The relationship between post-concussion kinesiophobia and clinical and functional reaction time (RT) beyond clinical recovery remains to be elucidated. Methods: College-aged participants with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) a concussion history completed patient-reported outcomes, and RT tasks. Kinesiophobia, symptoms and RTs were compared using t-tests. Linear regressions were performed to determine if kinesiophobia predicted RT measures and dual-task cost. Results: The concussion history group reported higher scores (p < 0.01) for all patient-reported outcomes. We observed significant single-task RT differences between groups (p = 0.013) such that those without a concussion history (m = 0.51s ± 0.08) were faster (m = 0.59s ± 0.12). There were no clinical or dual-task RT differences between groups (p > 0.05). Kinesiophobia significantly predicted single-task RT (R2 = 0.22). Discussion: Kinesiophobia should be considered when measuring RT.","PeriodicalId":37006,"journal":{"name":"Concussion","volume":"113 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concussion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/cnc-2023-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The relationship between post-concussion kinesiophobia and clinical and functional reaction time (RT) beyond clinical recovery remains to be elucidated. Methods: College-aged participants with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) a concussion history completed patient-reported outcomes, and RT tasks. Kinesiophobia, symptoms and RTs were compared using t-tests. Linear regressions were performed to determine if kinesiophobia predicted RT measures and dual-task cost. Results: The concussion history group reported higher scores (p < 0.01) for all patient-reported outcomes. We observed significant single-task RT differences between groups (p = 0.013) such that those without a concussion history (m = 0.51s ± 0.08) were faster (m = 0.59s ± 0.12). There were no clinical or dual-task RT differences between groups (p > 0.05). Kinesiophobia significantly predicted single-task RT (R2 = 0.22). Discussion: Kinesiophobia should be considered when measuring RT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初步调查运动恐惧对脑震荡一年后功能反应时间的预测作用
目的:脑震荡后运动恐惧与临床恢复后的临床和功能反应时间(RT)之间的关系仍有待阐明。研究方法:有脑震荡病史(20 人)和无脑震荡病史(20 人)的大学生分别完成了患者报告结果和反应时任务。通过 t 检验对运动恐惧、症状和 RT 进行比较。进行线性回归以确定运动恐惧是否能预测 RT 测量和双任务成本。结果显示脑震荡病史组的得分更高(P 0.05)。运动恐惧对单任务 RT 有明显的预测作用(R2 = 0.22)。讨论在测量 RT 时应考虑运动恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Concussion
Concussion Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Persistent post-concussion symptoms include neural auditory processing in young children. Initial investigation of kinesiophobia as a predictor of functional reaction time one year after concussion Awareness and understanding of concussion among Aboriginal Australians with high health literacy Dual statistical models link baseline visual attention measure to risk for significant symptomatic concussion in sports The National Football League and traumatic brain injury: blood-based evaluation at the game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1