Experimental and numerical analysis on shear capacity of steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete beams with different shear span ratios

IF 3.5 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Structural Integrity Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1108/ijsi-02-2024-0028
Jiahao Jiang, Jinliang Liu, Shuolei Cao, Sheng Cao, Rui Dong, Yusen Wu
{"title":"Experimental and numerical analysis on shear capacity of steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete beams with different shear span ratios","authors":"Jiahao Jiang, Jinliang Liu, Shuolei Cao, Sheng Cao, Rui Dong, Yusen Wu","doi":"10.1108/ijsi-02-2024-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to use the corrected stress field theory to derive the shear capacity of geopolymer concrete beams (GPC) and consider the shear-span ratio as a major factor affecting the shear capacity. This research aims to provide guidance for studying the shear capacity of GPC and to observe how the failure modes of beams change with the variation of the shear-span ratio, thereby discovering underlying patterns.Design/methodology/approachThree test beams with shear span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 are investigated in this paper. For GPC beams with shear-span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5, ultimate capacities are 337kN, 235kN and 195kN, respectively. Transitioning from 1.5 to 2.0 results in a 30% decrease in capacity, a reduction of 102kN. Moving from 2.0 to 2.5 sees a 17% decrease, with a loss of 40KN in capacity. A shear capacity formula, derived from modified compression field theory and considering concrete shear strength, stirrups and aggregate interlocking force, was validated through finite element modeling. Additionally, models with shear ratios of 1 and 3 were created to observe crack propagation patterns.FindingsFor GPC beams with shear-span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5, ultimate capacities of 337KN, 235KN and 195KN are achieved, respectively. A reduction in capacity of 102KN occurs when transitioning from 1.5 to 2.0 and a decrease of 40KN is observed when moving from 2.0 to 2.5. The average test-to-theory ratio, at 1.015 with a variance of 0.001, demonstrates strong agreement. ABAQUS models beams with ratios ranging from 1.0 to 3.0, revealing crack trends indicative of reduced crack angles with higher ratios. The failure mode observed in the models aligns with experimental results.Originality/valueThis article provides a reference for the shear bearing capacity formula of geopolymer reinforced concrete (GRC) beams, addressing the limited research in this area. Additionally, an exponential model incorporating the shear-span ratio as a variable was employed to calculate the shear capacity, based on previous studies. Moreover, the analysis of shear capacity results integrated literature from prior research. By fitting previous experimental data to the proposed formula, the accuracy of this study's derived formula was further validated, with theoretical values aligning well with experimental results. Additionally, guidance is offered for utilizing ABAQUS in simulating the failure process of GRC beams.","PeriodicalId":45359,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Structural Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsi-02-2024-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to use the corrected stress field theory to derive the shear capacity of geopolymer concrete beams (GPC) and consider the shear-span ratio as a major factor affecting the shear capacity. This research aims to provide guidance for studying the shear capacity of GPC and to observe how the failure modes of beams change with the variation of the shear-span ratio, thereby discovering underlying patterns.Design/methodology/approachThree test beams with shear span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 are investigated in this paper. For GPC beams with shear-span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5, ultimate capacities are 337kN, 235kN and 195kN, respectively. Transitioning from 1.5 to 2.0 results in a 30% decrease in capacity, a reduction of 102kN. Moving from 2.0 to 2.5 sees a 17% decrease, with a loss of 40KN in capacity. A shear capacity formula, derived from modified compression field theory and considering concrete shear strength, stirrups and aggregate interlocking force, was validated through finite element modeling. Additionally, models with shear ratios of 1 and 3 were created to observe crack propagation patterns.FindingsFor GPC beams with shear-span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5, ultimate capacities of 337KN, 235KN and 195KN are achieved, respectively. A reduction in capacity of 102KN occurs when transitioning from 1.5 to 2.0 and a decrease of 40KN is observed when moving from 2.0 to 2.5. The average test-to-theory ratio, at 1.015 with a variance of 0.001, demonstrates strong agreement. ABAQUS models beams with ratios ranging from 1.0 to 3.0, revealing crack trends indicative of reduced crack angles with higher ratios. The failure mode observed in the models aligns with experimental results.Originality/valueThis article provides a reference for the shear bearing capacity formula of geopolymer reinforced concrete (GRC) beams, addressing the limited research in this area. Additionally, an exponential model incorporating the shear-span ratio as a variable was employed to calculate the shear capacity, based on previous studies. Moreover, the analysis of shear capacity results integrated literature from prior research. By fitting previous experimental data to the proposed formula, the accuracy of this study's derived formula was further validated, with theoretical values aligning well with experimental results. Additionally, guidance is offered for utilizing ABAQUS in simulating the failure process of GRC beams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剪跨比钢筋土工聚合物混凝土梁抗剪承载力的实验和数值分析
本研究的目的是利用校正应力场理论推导土工聚合物混凝土梁(GPC)的抗剪承载力,并将剪跨比视为影响抗剪承载力的主要因素。本研究旨在为研究土工聚合物混凝土梁(GPC)的抗剪承载力提供指导,并观察梁的破坏模式如何随剪跨比的变化而变化,从而发现其中蕴含的规律。对于剪跨比分别为 1.5、2.0 和 2.5 的 GPC 梁,极限承载力分别为 337kN、235kN 和 195kN。从 1.5 过渡到 2.0 会导致承载力下降 30%,即减少 102 千牛。从 2.0 升至 2.5 时,承载力下降了 17%,减少了 40 千牛。通过有限元建模,验证了一个剪切承载力公式,该公式源于修正的压缩场理论,并考虑了混凝土剪切强度、箍筋和骨料连锁力。研究结果对于剪跨比分别为 1.5、2.0 和 2.5 的 GPC 梁,其极限承载力分别为 337KN、235KN 和 195KN。从 1.5 过渡到 2.0 时,承载力降低了 102 千牛,从 2.0 过渡到 2.5 时,承载力降低了 40 千牛。测试与理论的平均比值为 1.015,方差为 0.001,这表明两者非常一致。ABAQUS 对比率从 1.0 到 3.0 的梁进行建模,发现裂缝趋势表明,比率越高,裂缝角度越小。本文为土工聚合物加固混凝土(GRC)梁的抗剪承载力公式提供了参考,解决了该领域研究有限的问题。此外,在前人研究的基础上,还采用了将剪跨比作为变量的指数模型来计算剪切承载力。此外,剪切承载力的分析结果整合了之前研究的文献。通过将先前的实验数据与拟议公式进行拟合,进一步验证了本研究推导公式的准确性,理论值与实验结果十分吻合。此外,还为使用 ABAQUS 模拟 GRC 梁的破坏过程提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Structural Integrity
International Journal of Structural Integrity ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.80%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Study on crack law of shield segment under load variation based on XFEM Study on crack law of shield segment under load variation based on XFEM Research of criteria for analyzing the load-bearing capacity of buildings in areas of technogenic impact caused by mining operations Detection of bridge damage through analysis of dynamic response to vehicular loads utilizing long-gauge sensors Ultimate resistance and fatigue performance predictions of woven-based fiber reinforced polymers using a computational homogenization method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1