The power of WHO epistemic communities: The “tobacco epidemic” as construct

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1111/polp.12602

Marta Hoffmann

{"title":"The power of WHO epistemic communities: The “tobacco epidemic” as construct","authors":"Marta Hoffmann","doi":"10.1111/polp.12602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The aim of this article is to present the idea that the tobacco epidemic, included in the World Health Organization's (WHO) documents, may have contributed to the success of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). The tobacco epidemic as a construct was present in internal and official WHO documentation as well as in scientific publications of the tobacco control-oriented scientists who constituted the anti-tobacco epistemic community. Using a qualitative approach, I analyzed three sets of texts to describe the features of the tobacco epidemic and how it may have contributed to the success of the FCTC. The methodology of the analysis was based on the sociological concept of medicalization. I argue that by virtue of medicalized framing in the case of the FCTC, the WHO was able to influence the debate on tobacco control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Luján José, Luis. 2023. “Evidence-Based Policies: Lessons from Regulatory Science.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 51(4): 524–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12543.</p>\n \n <p>Newman, Joshua. 2019. “The Role of Uncertainty in Regulating E-Cigarettes: The Emergence of a Regulatory Regime, 2005-15.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 47(2): 407–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12294.</p>\n \n <p>Roberts, Alex N. 2023. “The Scientization of Public Policy and Politics: A New Approach to Conceptualizing and Identifying the Phenomenon.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 51(5): 726–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12548.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 3","pages":"520-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the idea that the tobacco epidemic, included in the World Health Organization's (WHO) documents, may have contributed to the success of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). The tobacco epidemic as a construct was present in internal and official WHO documentation as well as in scientific publications of the tobacco control-oriented scientists who constituted the anti-tobacco epistemic community. Using a qualitative approach, I analyzed three sets of texts to describe the features of the tobacco epidemic and how it may have contributed to the success of the FCTC. The methodology of the analysis was based on the sociological concept of medicalization. I argue that by virtue of medicalized framing in the case of the FCTC, the WHO was able to influence the debate on tobacco control.

Luján José, Luis. 2023. “Evidence-Based Policies: Lessons from Regulatory Science.” Politics & Policy 51(4): 524–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12543.

Newman, Joshua. 2019. “The Role of Uncertainty in Regulating E-Cigarettes: The Emergence of a Regulatory Regime, 2005-15.” Politics & Policy 47(2): 407–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12294.

Roberts, Alex N. 2023. “The Scientization of Public Policy and Politics: A New Approach to Conceptualizing and Identifying the Phenomenon.” Politics & Policy 51(5): 726–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12548.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

世卫组织认识论群体的力量：作为建构的 "烟草流行病

本文旨在提出一个观点，即世界卫生组织（WHO）文件中包含的烟草流行病可能有助于《烟草控制框架公约》（FCTC）的成功。烟草流行病作为一个概念出现在世界卫生组织的内部和官方文件中，也出现在以烟草控制为导向的科学家的科学出版物中，这些科学家构成了反烟草认识论群体。我采用定性方法分析了三组文本，以描述烟草流行病的特征以及它如何促成了《公约》的成功。分析方法基于医学化的社会学概念。我认为，在《烟草控制框架公约》的案例中，凭借医学化的框架，世卫组织能够影响有关烟草控制的辩论。2023."基于证据的政策：来自监管科学的教训"。Politics & Policy 51(4)：https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12543.Newman, Joshua.2019."不确定性在电子烟监管中的作用：2005-15年监管制度的出现》。政治与政策》47（2）：https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12294.Roberts, Alex N. 2023."公共政策与政治的科学化：A New Approach to Conceptualizing and Identifying the Phenomenon." 《公共政策与政治的科学化：概念化和识别现象的新方法》。Politics & Policy 51(5)：726–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12548.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

23.10%

发文量