Richard Nagel and the challenge of employee retention

Stuart Rosenberg
{"title":"Richard Nagel and the challenge of employee retention","authors":"Stuart Rosenberg","doi":"10.1108/tcj-06-2023-0127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research methodology\nInformation was obtained in interviews with Richard Nagel in Winter/Spring 2022. This information was supplemented by material from secondary sources. The only information that was disguised were the real names for Bob Crater, Tim Landy, Jane Tolley and Mary Nagel.\nThe case was classroom tested in Summer 2022. The responses from students helped to shape the writing of the case.\n\nCase overview/synopsis\nRichard Nagel, the owner of the RE/MAX Elite real estate agency in Monmouth Beach, New Jersey, has just learned that one of his agents, Tim Landy, quit and left the industry. Tim was a young real estate agent and Richard had spent considerable time training him. Tim was motivated and he worked hard to prospect for business, but he showed that he was experiencing difficulty closing on his sales. Richard decided to recommend that Tim work with another agent, Bob Crater, as Bob was an experienced salesman but was not doing the up-front prospecting that Tim was doing. Richard suggested two different strategies to the two agents – a pairing up arrangement and peer-to-peer learning. The outcome that Richard envisioned was that both of the struggling salesmen would benefit from either of these strategies, but Bob refused to collaborate.\nTim’s quitting was characteristic of an ongoing problem with employee retention that Richard had been experiencing as a manager in recent years. This problem caused Richard to think about how he recruited his real estate agents, how he developed them through coaching and how he motivated them so that they would stay happy in their job and not leave. He recognized the importance of thoroughly examining his retention strategy within the next 12 months so that he could better manage the problem and strengthen the productivity of his real estate agency.\n\nComplexity academic level\nThe case is intended for an undergraduate course in human resources management, as it deals directly with recruiting, coaching and retaining employees.\n","PeriodicalId":508685,"journal":{"name":"The CASE Journal","volume":"53 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CASE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tcj-06-2023-0127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research methodology Information was obtained in interviews with Richard Nagel in Winter/Spring 2022. This information was supplemented by material from secondary sources. The only information that was disguised were the real names for Bob Crater, Tim Landy, Jane Tolley and Mary Nagel. The case was classroom tested in Summer 2022. The responses from students helped to shape the writing of the case. Case overview/synopsis Richard Nagel, the owner of the RE/MAX Elite real estate agency in Monmouth Beach, New Jersey, has just learned that one of his agents, Tim Landy, quit and left the industry. Tim was a young real estate agent and Richard had spent considerable time training him. Tim was motivated and he worked hard to prospect for business, but he showed that he was experiencing difficulty closing on his sales. Richard decided to recommend that Tim work with another agent, Bob Crater, as Bob was an experienced salesman but was not doing the up-front prospecting that Tim was doing. Richard suggested two different strategies to the two agents – a pairing up arrangement and peer-to-peer learning. The outcome that Richard envisioned was that both of the struggling salesmen would benefit from either of these strategies, but Bob refused to collaborate. Tim’s quitting was characteristic of an ongoing problem with employee retention that Richard had been experiencing as a manager in recent years. This problem caused Richard to think about how he recruited his real estate agents, how he developed them through coaching and how he motivated them so that they would stay happy in their job and not leave. He recognized the importance of thoroughly examining his retention strategy within the next 12 months so that he could better manage the problem and strengthen the productivity of his real estate agency. Complexity academic level The case is intended for an undergraduate course in human resources management, as it deals directly with recruiting, coaching and retaining employees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理查德-纳格尔与留住员工的挑战
研究方法通过 2022 年冬/春对理查德-纳格尔的访谈获得信息。这些信息得到了二手资料的补充。唯一伪装的信息是鲍勃-克拉特(Bob Crater)、蒂姆-兰迪(Tim Landy)、简-托利(Jane Tolley)和玛丽-纳格尔(Mary Nagel)的真实姓名。案例概述/梗概理查德-纳格尔(Richard Nagel)是新泽西州蒙茅斯海滩 RE/MAX Elite 房地产代理公司的老板,他刚刚得知他的一位经纪人蒂姆-兰迪(Tim Landy)辞职离开了这个行业。蒂姆是一位年轻的房地产经纪人,理查德花了大量时间对他进行培训。蒂姆积极进取,努力开拓业务,但他的表现表明,他在完成销售方面遇到了困难。理查德决定建议蒂姆与另一名经纪人鲍勃-克拉特(Bob Crater)合作,因为鲍勃是一名经验丰富的销售人员,但他不像蒂姆那样进行前期的业务拓展。理查德向这两位代理建议了两种不同的策略--结对安排和同行学习。理查德设想的结果是,这两个陷入困境的销售员都能从这两种策略中受益,但鲍勃拒绝合作。蒂姆的辞职是理查德作为经理近年来一直遇到的留住员工问题的特征。这个问题让理查德开始思考,他是如何招聘房地产经纪人的,如何通过辅导来培养他们,又是如何激励他们,使他们能够快乐地工作而不离开的。他认识到在未来 12 个月内彻底检查其留住员工战略的重要性,这样他就可以更好地管理这个问题,并提高其房地产代理公司的生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Too good to be true! Paid parental leave for 5 years Social media, artificial intelligence (AI), and one burning question: How to balance problems and progress? Aloe Health (A & B): building, turning around, and selling a women-owned healthcare services business Creating a capital-efficient organization: Accele BioPharma Upset, yet loyal: employee voice amidst unionization at Starbucks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1