Too good to be true! Paid parental leave for 5 years

Jasmin Lin, Haohsuan Holly Chiu
{"title":"Too good to be true! Paid parental leave for 5 years","authors":"Jasmin Lin, Haohsuan Holly Chiu","doi":"10.1108/tcj-01-2024-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nResearch methodology\nThis case study is built from secondary data such as news articles, regulations and videos. Several drafts of the case study with a teaching note were tested in the classroom setting and shared in a case writing conference. The case was revised based on feedback from students and roundtable discussions from the conference.\n\n\nCase overview/synopsis\nMrs Hsu, the Deputy Director of the National Taxation Bureau’s Nantou County Branch in Taiwan, faced a dilemma in June 2021. One of her employees, Mrs Chiang, had requested to return to work after taking several years of parental leave since August 2017. This long absence had put a strain on colleagues, who either had to cover for her or work with temporary replacements. While Mrs Chiang’s actions were legal and protected by her government employee role, her decision to take another leave immediately after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine raised eyebrows. Her peers accused her of using her frontline worker status to gain early vaccine access and other work benefits. Mrs Hsu, upon reviewing Mrs Chiang’s employment history, pondered her next steps concerning Mrs Chiang’s new leave request.\n\n\nComplexity academic level\nThis case would be appropriate for a course in Human Resource Management, Organizational Behavior or Gender, Family and Work, especially with the topic of Employment Rights/Legal Protections (in HR), and/or Justice and Ethics (in OB).\n","PeriodicalId":508685,"journal":{"name":"The CASE Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CASE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tcj-01-2024-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research methodology This case study is built from secondary data such as news articles, regulations and videos. Several drafts of the case study with a teaching note were tested in the classroom setting and shared in a case writing conference. The case was revised based on feedback from students and roundtable discussions from the conference. Case overview/synopsis Mrs Hsu, the Deputy Director of the National Taxation Bureau’s Nantou County Branch in Taiwan, faced a dilemma in June 2021. One of her employees, Mrs Chiang, had requested to return to work after taking several years of parental leave since August 2017. This long absence had put a strain on colleagues, who either had to cover for her or work with temporary replacements. While Mrs Chiang’s actions were legal and protected by her government employee role, her decision to take another leave immediately after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine raised eyebrows. Her peers accused her of using her frontline worker status to gain early vaccine access and other work benefits. Mrs Hsu, upon reviewing Mrs Chiang’s employment history, pondered her next steps concerning Mrs Chiang’s new leave request. Complexity academic level This case would be appropriate for a course in Human Resource Management, Organizational Behavior or Gender, Family and Work, especially with the topic of Employment Rights/Legal Protections (in HR), and/or Justice and Ethics (in OB).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
好得难以置信5 年带薪育儿假
研究方法 本案例研究以新闻报道、法规和视频等二手资料为基础。在课堂上对案例研究的几稿和教学说明进行了测试,并在案例写作会议上进行了交流。2021 年 6 月,台湾国税局南投县分局副局长许女士遇到了一个难题。她的一名员工蒋女士自 2017 年 8 月起休了几年的育儿假,之后要求重返工作岗位。长时间的缺席给同事们造成了压力,他们不得不替她顶班,或者用临时替代人员工作。虽然蒋女士的行为是合法的,并受到其政府雇员身份的保护,但她在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后立即再次休假的决定引起了人们的关注。她的同事指责她利用一线工人的身份提前获得疫苗和其他工作福利。本案例适用于人力资源管理、组织行为学或性别、家庭与工作课程,尤其是以就业权利/法律保护(人力资源)和/或正义与道德(组织行为学)为主题的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Too good to be true! Paid parental leave for 5 years Social media, artificial intelligence (AI), and one burning question: How to balance problems and progress? Aloe Health (A & B): building, turning around, and selling a women-owned healthcare services business Creating a capital-efficient organization: Accele BioPharma Upset, yet loyal: employee voice amidst unionization at Starbucks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1