Research ethics in social science research during health pandemics: what can we learn from COVID-19 experiences?

T. Pherali, Sara Bragg, Catherine Borra, Phil Jones
{"title":"Research ethics in social science research during health pandemics: what can we learn from COVID-19 experiences?","authors":"T. Pherali, Sara Bragg, Catherine Borra, Phil Jones","doi":"10.1177/17470161241252414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic posed many ethical and practical challenges for academic research. Some of these have been documented, particularly in relation to health research, but less attention has been paid to the dilemmas encountered by educational and social science research. Given that pandemics are predicted to be more frequent, it is vital to understand how to continue crucial research in schools and other learning communities. This article therefore focuses specifically on research ethics in educational and social science during the pandemic of 2020–2022. The research involved interviews and workshops with University College London (UCL) academics, professional staff and graduate students and encompassed those involved in reviewing ethics applications, researchers dealing with ethics in projects that continued despite disruptions caused by COVID-19, and successful research projects specifically designed to study the effects of COVID-19 in various contexts. The article discusses some of the crucial knowledge and practical experiences that were accumulated. The operational and epistemological lessons learned from this particular institution may have wider relevance to research ethics processes in higher education environments where academics and students are grappling with post-COVID-19 ethical dilemmas and inform broader debates about how research institutions can build institutional knowledge to improve practices of ethics review at the times of health emergencies in future. Our evidence points to the significance of inter- and multidisciplinary, collaborative approaches that flatten institutional hierarchies and to the crucial role played by professional staff. In addition, we argue that ethics review processes must be underpinned by critical debates about wider issues of unequal power relationships between research partners, the nature of knowledge production, ownership and utilisation. To enhance equity and epistemic justice in research practices, ethics education should be an ongoing integral part of research ethics within research institutions.","PeriodicalId":510000,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241252414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic posed many ethical and practical challenges for academic research. Some of these have been documented, particularly in relation to health research, but less attention has been paid to the dilemmas encountered by educational and social science research. Given that pandemics are predicted to be more frequent, it is vital to understand how to continue crucial research in schools and other learning communities. This article therefore focuses specifically on research ethics in educational and social science during the pandemic of 2020–2022. The research involved interviews and workshops with University College London (UCL) academics, professional staff and graduate students and encompassed those involved in reviewing ethics applications, researchers dealing with ethics in projects that continued despite disruptions caused by COVID-19, and successful research projects specifically designed to study the effects of COVID-19 in various contexts. The article discusses some of the crucial knowledge and practical experiences that were accumulated. The operational and epistemological lessons learned from this particular institution may have wider relevance to research ethics processes in higher education environments where academics and students are grappling with post-COVID-19 ethical dilemmas and inform broader debates about how research institutions can build institutional knowledge to improve practices of ethics review at the times of health emergencies in future. Our evidence points to the significance of inter- and multidisciplinary, collaborative approaches that flatten institutional hierarchies and to the crucial role played by professional staff. In addition, we argue that ethics review processes must be underpinned by critical debates about wider issues of unequal power relationships between research partners, the nature of knowledge production, ownership and utilisation. To enhance equity and epistemic justice in research practices, ethics education should be an ongoing integral part of research ethics within research institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生大流行期间社会科学研究的研究伦理:我们能从 COVID-19 的经验中学到什么?
COVID-19 大流行给学术研究带来了许多伦理和实际挑战。其中一些挑战已被记录在案,特别是与健康研究有关的挑战,但教育和社会科学研究遇到的困境却较少受到关注。鉴于大流行病预计会更加频繁,了解如何在学校和其他学习社区继续开展至关重要的研究至关重要。因此,本文特别关注 2020-2022 年大流行期间教育和社会科学研究的伦理问题。研究工作包括对伦敦大学学院(UCL)的学者、专业人员和研究生进行访谈和举办研讨会,其中包括参与审查伦理申请的人员、在 COVID-19 造成干扰的情况下仍在继续进行的项目中处理伦理问题的研究人员,以及专门为研究 COVID-19 在各种情况下的影响而设计的成功研究项目。文章讨论了积累的一些重要知识和实践经验。从这一特殊机构中汲取的操作和认识论方面的经验教训可能对高等教育环境中的研究伦理过程具有更广泛的意义,因为在高等教育环境中,学者和学生们都在努力应对 COVID-19 后的伦理困境,并为更广泛的讨论提供信息,即研究机构可以如何积累机构知识,以改进未来卫生突发事件时的伦理审查实践。我们的证据表明了跨学科和多学科合作方法的重要性,这种方法可以扁平化机构的等级制度,也表明了专业人员所发挥的关键作用。此外,我们认为伦理审查过程必须以批判性辩论为基础,讨论研究伙伴之间不平等的权力关系、知识生产、所有权和利用的性质等更广泛的问题。为了提高研究实践中的公平性和认识论公正性,伦理教育应成为研究机构内研究伦理不可分割的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing dual use: A multidimensional approach Applying Ethics in the Handling of Dual Use Research: The Case of Germany Between urgency and data quality: assessing the FAIRness of data in social science research on the COVID-19 pandemic Expanding the ethical debate on human artificial placenta trials Research ethics preparedness during outbreaks and public health emergencies: Focus on community engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1