Cosmetic Formulations from Natural Sources: Safety Considerations and Legislative Frameworks in the European Union

IF 3.4 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Cosmetics Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.3390/cosmetics11030072
Maame Ekua Manful, Lubna Ahmed, Catherine Barry-Ryan
{"title":"Cosmetic Formulations from Natural Sources: Safety Considerations and Legislative Frameworks in the European Union","authors":"Maame Ekua Manful, Lubna Ahmed, Catherine Barry-Ryan","doi":"10.3390/cosmetics11030072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumer preferences, safety, and sustainability aspects of conventional cosmetic ingredients have contributed to an increase in the demand for natural cosmetic ingredients and products. Naturally derived active cosmetic agents and excipients may come into contact with various naturally occurring and synthetic contaminants throughout the supply chain, and substantiating their safety is essential. This review examines the safety and legislative requirements applicable to natural cosmetic ingredients in the European Union (EU). Cosmetic safety requirements include technical data based on the ingredient profile, presence of hazards and the risks associated with the intended conditions of use. The hazard analysis includes screening for microbial contaminants such as aerobic mesophilic bacteria, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans; chemical contaminants such as lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury; and naturally occurring toxins, such as allergens. The toxicological assessment considers both local effects (such as skin sensitisation, eye/skin irritation, and photo-induced effects) and systemic effects (including acute dermal toxicity, sub-acute and sub-chronic toxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, and toxicokinetics). The EU legislative requirements prohibit the use of animal-based tests for the toxicological evaluation of cosmetic ingredients, paving the way for alternatives termed as New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). The validation of NAMs is critical for their wider usage, and despite advancements, few have been validated, particularly for systemic toxicity testing. The use of NAMs in evaluating the safety of complex natural cosmetic ingredients is further examined.","PeriodicalId":10735,"journal":{"name":"Cosmetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cosmetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11030072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer preferences, safety, and sustainability aspects of conventional cosmetic ingredients have contributed to an increase in the demand for natural cosmetic ingredients and products. Naturally derived active cosmetic agents and excipients may come into contact with various naturally occurring and synthetic contaminants throughout the supply chain, and substantiating their safety is essential. This review examines the safety and legislative requirements applicable to natural cosmetic ingredients in the European Union (EU). Cosmetic safety requirements include technical data based on the ingredient profile, presence of hazards and the risks associated with the intended conditions of use. The hazard analysis includes screening for microbial contaminants such as aerobic mesophilic bacteria, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans; chemical contaminants such as lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury; and naturally occurring toxins, such as allergens. The toxicological assessment considers both local effects (such as skin sensitisation, eye/skin irritation, and photo-induced effects) and systemic effects (including acute dermal toxicity, sub-acute and sub-chronic toxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity, and toxicokinetics). The EU legislative requirements prohibit the use of animal-based tests for the toxicological evaluation of cosmetic ingredients, paving the way for alternatives termed as New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). The validation of NAMs is critical for their wider usage, and despite advancements, few have been validated, particularly for systemic toxicity testing. The use of NAMs in evaluating the safety of complex natural cosmetic ingredients is further examined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天然来源的化妆品配方:欧盟的安全考虑因素和立法框架
消费者对传统化妆品成分的偏好、安全性和可持续性等方面的因素促使对天然化妆品成分和产品的需求增加。天然萃取的活性化妆品剂和辅料在整个供应链中可能会接触到各种天然和合成污染物,因此证实其安全性至关重要。本综述探讨了适用于欧盟(EU)天然化妆品成分的安全性和立法要求。化妆品安全要求包括基于成分概况的技术数据、存在的危害以及与预期使用条件相关的风险。危害分析包括筛查微生物污染物,如需氧中嗜酸性细菌、大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和白色念珠菌;化学污染物,如铅、镉、砷和汞;以及天然毒素,如过敏原。毒理学评估同时考虑局部效应(如皮肤过敏、眼睛/皮肤刺激和光诱导效应)和全身效应(包括急性皮肤毒性、亚急性和亚慢性毒性、诱变性和致癌性、生殖毒性和毒物动力学)。欧盟的立法要求禁止在化妆品成分的毒理学评估中使用动物试验,从而为被称为新方法(NAMs)的替代品铺平了道路。新方法的验证对其广泛应用至关重要,尽管取得了进展,但经过验证的新方法仍然很少,尤其是在全身毒性测试方面。本文进一步探讨了如何使用新方法评估复杂天然化妆品成分的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cosmetics
Cosmetics Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cosmetology in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Protective Effects of Recombined Mussel Adhesive Protein against AD Skin Inflammation in Mice Apigenin and Phloretin Combination for Skin Aging and Hyperpigmentation Regulation Design, Development, and In Vivo Testing of the Hydrating Effect and pH Maintenance a Cosmetic Formulation Incorporating Oils and an Extract from Peruvian Biodiversity Unwanted Skin Reactions to Acrylates: An Update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1