Abstract PO4-13-02: Molecular Expression Assays Improve the Prediction of Local and Invasive Local Recurrence after Breast Conserving Surgery for DCIS

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ACS Chemical Health & Safety Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po4-13-02
Ezra Hahn, R. Sutradhar, L. Paszat, Lena Nguyen, Danielle Rodin, S. Nofech-Mozes, Sabina Trebinjac, Cindy Fong, E. Rakovitch
{"title":"Abstract PO4-13-02: Molecular Expression Assays Improve the Prediction of Local and Invasive Local Recurrence after Breast Conserving Surgery for DCIS","authors":"Ezra Hahn, R. Sutradhar, L. Paszat, Lena Nguyen, Danielle Rodin, S. Nofech-Mozes, Sabina Trebinjac, Cindy Fong, E. Rakovitch","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po4-13-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction\n Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in order to reduce the risk of local recurrence (LR) and invasive LR. Nomograms based on clinicopathological features (CPF) and molecular expression assays have been developed in an effort to provide individualized risk estimates and personalize decision-making. However, molecular assays are costly and it remains unclear if they provide more accurate recurrence risk estimates compared to algorithms based on CPF alone. We examined the impact of the 12-Gene DCIS Score (DS) and the 21-Gene Recurrence Score (RS) molecular expression assays, in addition to CPF, on the accuracy of predicting 10-year LR and invasive LR risk compared to predicted estimates based on CPF alone. In addition, we examined if a model including the 21-Gene RS improves the 10-year predicted risks of invasive LR after BCS for DCIS compared to estimates based on the DS+CPF or CPF alone.\n Methods\n We used a population-based cohort diagnosed with pure DCIS treated with BCS +/- RT from 1994-2003. All cases had expert pathology review providing contemporary assessment of diagnosis, margin status, margin width, multifocality, presence and extent of comedo necrosis, subtype, nuclear grade, and tumor size. For each case, a representative tissue block or unstained slide was sent to measure the 12-Gene DS and 21-Gene RS. Predictive models were developed using multivariable Cox regression analyses with backward selection and included all CPF, treatment with RT, and interactions. The performance of each model was evaluated based on c-statistic, -2log likelihood estimate (-2LLE), and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Calibration was performed using bootstrap resamples, with replacement. We compared the performance of the best model derived from CPF alone, the 12-Gene DS with CPF, and the 21-Gene RS with CPF on their ability to predict the 10 year risks of LR and invasive LR measured against outcomes observed in the cohort.\n Results\n The population-based cohort includes 1226 women, 514 were treated with BCS alone and 712 were treated with BCS + RT. Median age was 56 years. Median follow-up was 10 years. Fifty-two percent of tumors were between 1 and 2.5 cm, 35% were ≤1cm, and 13% were >2.5 cm. Comedo necrosis was present in 68%, and nuclear grade was low, moderate, and high in 7%, 54%, and 39%, respectively. Margins were negative in 90.5% of cases (N=1109). The 12-Gene DS was low, intermediate, and high in 53.5%, 20.9%, and 25.6% and the 21-Gene RS was >25 in 30% of patients. 194 women (15.8%) experienced ipsilateral LR as a first event; 112 were invasive LR.\n Models including either the DS or RS expression assays performed better in predicting the 10-year risk of LR after BCS compared to the model based on CPFs alone, demonstrating higher c-statistics (0.705, 0.699, and 0.662, respectively), lower AIC and lower -2LLE. The two molecular-based predictive models also performed better in predicting the risk of invasive LR compared to CPF model, although with smaller differences in c-statistics (0.684, 0.683, and 0.667, respectively), AIC or -2LLE. The predictive model based on the 21-Gene RS with CPF did not perform better in the prediction of the 10 year risk of invasive LR compared the 12-Gene DS + CPF model. All models were well calibrated.\n Conclusion\n The predictive model based on the 12-Gene DS with CPF more accurately predicted the 10-year risk of LR and invasive LR after BCS compared to model based on CPF alone. Inclusion of the 21-Gene RS with CPF did not improve the prediction of the 10-year risk of LR or invasive LR. This suggests that nomograms that include the 12-Gene assay with CPF provide more accurate individualized estimates of recurrence risk after BCS and can help improve personalized decision-making in the management of DCIS.\n Citation Format: Ezra Hahn, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat, Lena Nguyen, Danielle Rodin, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sabina Trebinjac, Cindy Fong, Eileen Rakovitch. Molecular Expression Assays Improve the Prediction of Local and Invasive Local Recurrence after Breast Conserving Surgery for DCIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-13-02.","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"83 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po4-13-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) in order to reduce the risk of local recurrence (LR) and invasive LR. Nomograms based on clinicopathological features (CPF) and molecular expression assays have been developed in an effort to provide individualized risk estimates and personalize decision-making. However, molecular assays are costly and it remains unclear if they provide more accurate recurrence risk estimates compared to algorithms based on CPF alone. We examined the impact of the 12-Gene DCIS Score (DS) and the 21-Gene Recurrence Score (RS) molecular expression assays, in addition to CPF, on the accuracy of predicting 10-year LR and invasive LR risk compared to predicted estimates based on CPF alone. In addition, we examined if a model including the 21-Gene RS improves the 10-year predicted risks of invasive LR after BCS for DCIS compared to estimates based on the DS+CPF or CPF alone. Methods We used a population-based cohort diagnosed with pure DCIS treated with BCS +/- RT from 1994-2003. All cases had expert pathology review providing contemporary assessment of diagnosis, margin status, margin width, multifocality, presence and extent of comedo necrosis, subtype, nuclear grade, and tumor size. For each case, a representative tissue block or unstained slide was sent to measure the 12-Gene DS and 21-Gene RS. Predictive models were developed using multivariable Cox regression analyses with backward selection and included all CPF, treatment with RT, and interactions. The performance of each model was evaluated based on c-statistic, -2log likelihood estimate (-2LLE), and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Calibration was performed using bootstrap resamples, with replacement. We compared the performance of the best model derived from CPF alone, the 12-Gene DS with CPF, and the 21-Gene RS with CPF on their ability to predict the 10 year risks of LR and invasive LR measured against outcomes observed in the cohort. Results The population-based cohort includes 1226 women, 514 were treated with BCS alone and 712 were treated with BCS + RT. Median age was 56 years. Median follow-up was 10 years. Fifty-two percent of tumors were between 1 and 2.5 cm, 35% were ≤1cm, and 13% were >2.5 cm. Comedo necrosis was present in 68%, and nuclear grade was low, moderate, and high in 7%, 54%, and 39%, respectively. Margins were negative in 90.5% of cases (N=1109). The 12-Gene DS was low, intermediate, and high in 53.5%, 20.9%, and 25.6% and the 21-Gene RS was >25 in 30% of patients. 194 women (15.8%) experienced ipsilateral LR as a first event; 112 were invasive LR. Models including either the DS or RS expression assays performed better in predicting the 10-year risk of LR after BCS compared to the model based on CPFs alone, demonstrating higher c-statistics (0.705, 0.699, and 0.662, respectively), lower AIC and lower -2LLE. The two molecular-based predictive models also performed better in predicting the risk of invasive LR compared to CPF model, although with smaller differences in c-statistics (0.684, 0.683, and 0.667, respectively), AIC or -2LLE. The predictive model based on the 21-Gene RS with CPF did not perform better in the prediction of the 10 year risk of invasive LR compared the 12-Gene DS + CPF model. All models were well calibrated. Conclusion The predictive model based on the 12-Gene DS with CPF more accurately predicted the 10-year risk of LR and invasive LR after BCS compared to model based on CPF alone. Inclusion of the 21-Gene RS with CPF did not improve the prediction of the 10-year risk of LR or invasive LR. This suggests that nomograms that include the 12-Gene assay with CPF provide more accurate individualized estimates of recurrence risk after BCS and can help improve personalized decision-making in the management of DCIS. Citation Format: Ezra Hahn, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat, Lena Nguyen, Danielle Rodin, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sabina Trebinjac, Cindy Fong, Eileen Rakovitch. Molecular Expression Assays Improve the Prediction of Local and Invasive Local Recurrence after Breast Conserving Surgery for DCIS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-13-02.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要 PO4-13-02:分子表达测定可提高对DCIS保乳术后局部和侵袭性局部复发的预测能力
导言 乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)通常在保乳手术(BCS)后进行辅助放疗(RT),以降低局部复发(LR)和浸润性 LR 的风险。目前已开发出基于临床病理特征(CPF)和分子表达检测的提名图,以提供个体化的风险估计和个性化的决策。然而,分子检测成本高昂,而且与仅基于 CPF 的算法相比,分子检测是否能提供更准确的复发风险估计仍不清楚。我们研究了除 CPF 之外的 12 基因 DCIS 评分(DS)和 21 基因复发评分(RS)分子表达检测对 10 年 LR 和侵袭性 LR 风险预测准确性的影响,与仅基于 CPF 的预测相比。此外,我们还研究了与基于 DS+CPF 或仅基于 CPF 的估计值相比,包含 21 基因 RS 的模型是否能提高 DCIS BCS 后 10 年浸润性 LR 的预测风险。方法 我们使用了 1994-2003 年期间诊断为纯 DCIS 并接受 BCS +/- RT 治疗的人群队列。所有病例都经过了专家病理审查,对诊断、边缘状态、边缘宽度、多发性、合并坏死的存在和程度、亚型、核分级和肿瘤大小进行了当代评估。每个病例都要送去一个有代表性的组织块或未染色的切片,以测量 12 基因 DS 和 21 基因 RS。采用多变量考克斯回归分析和反向选择建立预测模型,包括所有 CPF、RT 治疗和交互作用。根据 c 统计量、-2log 似然估计值(-2LLE)和 Akaike 信息准则(AIC)对每个模型的性能进行评估。校准使用带替换的引导重采样进行。我们比较了由 CPF 单独得出的最佳模型、带有 CPF 的 12 基因 DS 和带有 CPF 的 21 基因 RS 预测 10 年 LR 和侵袭性 LR 风险的能力,并与队列中观察到的结果进行了比较。结果 基于人群的队列包括 1226 名女性,其中 514 人只接受了 BCS 治疗,712 人接受了 BCS + RT 治疗。中位年龄为 56 岁。随访时间中位数为10年。52%的肿瘤在1到2.5厘米之间,35%的肿瘤小于1厘米,13%的肿瘤大于2.5厘米。68%的肿瘤出现 Comedo 坏死,7%、54% 和 39% 的肿瘤核分级为低、中和高。90.5%的病例(N=1109)边缘呈阴性。53.5%、20.9%和25.6%的患者的12基因DS为低、中和高,30%的患者的21基因RS大于25。194名女性(15.8%)首次出现同侧LR,其中112例为侵袭性LR。与仅基于 CPFs 的模型相比,包含 DS 或 RS 表达检测的模型在预测 BCS 后 10 年 LR 风险方面表现更好,显示出更高的 c 统计量(分别为 0.705、0.699 和 0.662)、更低的 AIC 和更低的 -2LLE。与 CPF 模型相比,两种基于分子的预测模型在预测侵袭性 LR 风险方面的表现也更好,但 c 统计量(分别为 0.684、0.683 和 0.667)、AIC 或 -2LLE 的差异较小。与 12 基因 DS + CPF 模型相比,基于 21 基因 RS 与 CPF 的预测模型在预测 10 年侵袭性 LR 风险方面表现不佳。所有模型均校准良好。结论 与仅基于 CPF 的模型相比,基于 12 基因 DS 和 CPF 的预测模型能更准确地预测 BCS 后 10 年的 LR 和侵袭性 LR 风险。纳入带有 CPF 的 21 基因 RS 并没有改善对 LR 或侵袭性 LR 10 年风险的预测。这表明,包含 12 基因检测和 CPF 的提名图能对 BCS 后的复发风险提供更准确的个体化估计,有助于改善 DCIS 管理中的个性化决策。引用格式:Ezra Hahn、Rinku Sutradhar、Lawrence Paszat、Lena Nguyen、Danielle Rodin、Sharon Nofech-Mozes、Sabina Trebinjac、Cindy Fong、Eileen Rakovitch。分子表达测定改善了DCIS保乳术后局部和侵袭性局部复发的预测 [摘要].在:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-13-02.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
ACS Chemical Health & Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety focuses on news, information, and ideas relating to issues and advances in chemical health and safety. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety covers up-to-the minute, in-depth views of safety issues ranging from OSHA and EPA regulations to the safe handling of hazardous waste, from the latest innovations in effective chemical hygiene practices to the courts'' most recent rulings on safety-related lawsuits. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety presents real-world information that health, safety and environmental professionals and others responsible for the safety of their workplaces can put to use right away, identifying potential and developing safety concerns before they do real harm.
期刊最新文献
Developing an In-House Application for Hazardous Chemicals Management Calix[4]resorcinarenes as Stable, Metal-Free Unexplored and Unfathomed Material for Iodine Capture: Experimental and Theoretical Insights Risk Assessment of Ammonia Fueled Ships: Consequences on Human Health of Ammonia Releases from Damaged Fuel Storage Tanks Preparation of Fe-doped In2S3/In2O3 Composite for Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline The Gist of the List
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1