Abstract PO1-10-01: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ACS Chemical Health & Safety Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-10-01
Rebecca Zasloff, Samantha Thomas, Kendra M Parrish, Astrid Botty Van Den Bruele, G. DiLalla, Maggie DiNome, Laura Rosenberger, Hannah Woriax, E. S. Hwang, Jennifer Plichta, Akiko Chiba
{"title":"Abstract PO1-10-01: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer","authors":"Rebecca Zasloff, Samantha Thomas, Kendra M Parrish, Astrid Botty Van Den Bruele, G. DiLalla, Maggie DiNome, Laura Rosenberger, Hannah Woriax, E. S. Hwang, Jennifer Plichta, Akiko Chiba","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-10-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Radiation Therapy Toxicities and Survival Outcomes in Monoallelic ATM Variant Carriers with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Rayan Bensenane1 MD, Arnaud Beddok1,2,3 MD, Nadine Andrieu4 PhD, Fabienne Lesueur4 PhD, Eve Cavaciuti 4 MSc, Dorothee Le Gal4 MSc, Eon-Marchais Severine4 PhD, Dominique Stoppa Lyonnet 5MD PhD, Youlia Kirova1 MD 1. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, France. 2. Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA 3. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO U1288 Orsay, France 4. Inserm, U900, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France 5.Department of Genetics, Institut Curie; Inserm U830, Institut Curie; Paris-Cité University Abstract (characters: 2952; max 3400 characters, not include spaces) Background: The Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene, involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, can contribute to radiosensitivity when a bi-allelic variant is present and lead to Ataxia-Telangiectasia syndrome. Moreover, monoallelic ATM pathologic variant (PV) carriers, especially women, has an estimated occurrence rate of 0.5-1% globally and face a 2 to 3-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Despite evidence of in vitro radiosensitivity in cells derived from monoallelic variant carriers, there is a dearth of patient studies examining the risk of radiation-induced toxicity. This study aims to explore radiation therapy (RT) toxicities in non-metastatic breast cancer women carrying a germline monoallelic ATM variant, compared to non-carriers. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated at Institut Curie, Paris from 1999 to 2014 and participating to CoF-AT (a French national study) and GENESIS database. ATM variant screenings encompassed both PV and non-PV, with toxicities evaluated using CTCAE v.5. Variants were classified as pathogenic, variant of unknown significance (VUS), or benign. Follow-up started from age/date at breast cancer to acute, late toxicities, disease recurrence or last news. Survival and toxicity comparisons were made using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Chi-square tests, respectively, with a significance level of α set at 0.05. Results: Among 50 patients, nine were ATM variant carriers (3 PV/5 VUS/1 benign), and 41 were non-carriers. Most patients had no smoking history (68%), and invasive ductal carcinoma was the predominant diagnosis (82%). The majority underwent breast-conservative surgery (80%), and the dominant RT techniques were 3D-Conformational Radiation Therapy (70%) and Isocentric Lateral Decubitus (30%). The median RT dose was 50 Gy over an average period of 36.5 days. With a median follow-up of 12 years post-diagnosis, no significant difference in acute dermatitis, esophagitis, lymphedema, cutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, or heart disease was observed between the groups. Analysis of overall survival (OS) showed a 5-year OS of 98%, decreasing to 89% at 10 years. For ATM variant carriers, the OS at 5, 10, and 15 years was 100%, 89%, and 89%, respectively, similar to non-carriers. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in 5, 10, and 15-year overall survival, progression-free survival, local failure-specific survival, and contralateral breast cancer rates between the groups. Conclusion: In non-metastatic breast cancer patients, monoallelic ATM variant carrier status does not significantly influence acute or late RT toxicities and survival outcomes. These findings, derived from a small cohort, highlight the need for prospective studies for further validation.\n Table: Acute and Late Toxicities Post-Radiation Therapy in Monoallelic ATM Variant Carriers vs Non-Carriers\n Citation Format: Rebecca Zasloff, Samantha Thomas, Kendra Parrish, Astrid Botty van de Bruele, Gayle DiLalla, Maggie DiNome, Laura Rosenberger, Hannah Woriax, E Shelley Hwang, Jennifer Plichta, Akiko Chiba. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-10-01.","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-10-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiation Therapy Toxicities and Survival Outcomes in Monoallelic ATM Variant Carriers with Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Rayan Bensenane1 MD, Arnaud Beddok1,2,3 MD, Nadine Andrieu4 PhD, Fabienne Lesueur4 PhD, Eve Cavaciuti 4 MSc, Dorothee Le Gal4 MSc, Eon-Marchais Severine4 PhD, Dominique Stoppa Lyonnet 5MD PhD, Youlia Kirova1 MD 1. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Paris/Saint-Cloud/Orsay, France. 2. Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA 3. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO U1288 Orsay, France 4. Inserm, U900, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France 5.Department of Genetics, Institut Curie; Inserm U830, Institut Curie; Paris-Cité University Abstract (characters: 2952; max 3400 characters, not include spaces) Background: The Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene, involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, can contribute to radiosensitivity when a bi-allelic variant is present and lead to Ataxia-Telangiectasia syndrome. Moreover, monoallelic ATM pathologic variant (PV) carriers, especially women, has an estimated occurrence rate of 0.5-1% globally and face a 2 to 3-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. Despite evidence of in vitro radiosensitivity in cells derived from monoallelic variant carriers, there is a dearth of patient studies examining the risk of radiation-induced toxicity. This study aims to explore radiation therapy (RT) toxicities in non-metastatic breast cancer women carrying a germline monoallelic ATM variant, compared to non-carriers. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients treated at Institut Curie, Paris from 1999 to 2014 and participating to CoF-AT (a French national study) and GENESIS database. ATM variant screenings encompassed both PV and non-PV, with toxicities evaluated using CTCAE v.5. Variants were classified as pathogenic, variant of unknown significance (VUS), or benign. Follow-up started from age/date at breast cancer to acute, late toxicities, disease recurrence or last news. Survival and toxicity comparisons were made using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Chi-square tests, respectively, with a significance level of α set at 0.05. Results: Among 50 patients, nine were ATM variant carriers (3 PV/5 VUS/1 benign), and 41 were non-carriers. Most patients had no smoking history (68%), and invasive ductal carcinoma was the predominant diagnosis (82%). The majority underwent breast-conservative surgery (80%), and the dominant RT techniques were 3D-Conformational Radiation Therapy (70%) and Isocentric Lateral Decubitus (30%). The median RT dose was 50 Gy over an average period of 36.5 days. With a median follow-up of 12 years post-diagnosis, no significant difference in acute dermatitis, esophagitis, lymphedema, cutaneous fibrosis, telangiectasia, or heart disease was observed between the groups. Analysis of overall survival (OS) showed a 5-year OS of 98%, decreasing to 89% at 10 years. For ATM variant carriers, the OS at 5, 10, and 15 years was 100%, 89%, and 89%, respectively, similar to non-carriers. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in 5, 10, and 15-year overall survival, progression-free survival, local failure-specific survival, and contralateral breast cancer rates between the groups. Conclusion: In non-metastatic breast cancer patients, monoallelic ATM variant carrier status does not significantly influence acute or late RT toxicities and survival outcomes. These findings, derived from a small cohort, highlight the need for prospective studies for further validation. Table: Acute and Late Toxicities Post-Radiation Therapy in Monoallelic ATM Variant Carriers vs Non-Carriers Citation Format: Rebecca Zasloff, Samantha Thomas, Kendra Parrish, Astrid Botty van de Bruele, Gayle DiLalla, Maggie DiNome, Laura Rosenberger, Hannah Woriax, E Shelley Hwang, Jennifer Plichta, Akiko Chiba. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-10-01.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要 PO1-10-01:炎症性乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解率和生存率的种族/族裔差异
非转移性乳腺癌单倍型 ATM 变异携带者的放疗毒性和生存结果:回顾性分析 Rayan Bensenane1 MD, Arnaud Beddok1,2,3 MD, Nadine Andrieu4 PhD, Fabienne Lesueur4 PhD, Eve Cavaciuti 4 MSc, Dorothee Le Gal4 MSc, Eon-Marchais Severine4 PhD, Dominique Stoppa Lyonnet 5MD PhD, Youlia Kirova1 MD 1.法国巴黎/圣克卢/奥赛,居里研究所,PSL 研究大学,放射肿瘤部。2.戈登医学影像中心,麻省总医院,哈佛医学院,125 Nashua St.法国巴黎,Inserm,U900,居里研究所,PSL 研究大学,巴黎高科矿业大学 5.居里研究所遗传学系;Inserm U830,居里研究所;巴黎市立大学 摘要(字符数:2952;最多 3400 个字符,不包括空格) 背景:共济失调-特朗吉克斯综合征(Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated,ATM)基因参与DNA双链断裂的修复,当出现双等位基因变异时,可导致辐射敏感性,并导致共济失调-特朗吉克斯综合征。此外,ATM单倍型病理变异体(PV)携带者,尤其是女性,在全球的发生率估计为0.5-1%,罹患乳腺癌的风险增加了2-3倍。尽管有证据表明单等位基因变异携带者的细胞在体外具有放射敏感性,但对辐射诱导毒性风险的患者研究却十分缺乏。本研究旨在探讨与非携带者相比,携带种系单倍性ATM变异体的非转移性乳腺癌妇女的放射治疗(RT)毒性。研究方法这项回顾性研究的对象是1999年至2014年在巴黎居里研究所接受治疗并参与CoF-AT(法国国家研究)和GENESIS数据库的患者。ATM变异筛选包括PV和非PV,毒性采用CTCAE v.5进行评估。变异分为致病变异、意义不明变异(VUS)或良性变异。随访从乳腺癌患者的年龄/日期开始,直至出现急性、晚期毒性、疾病复发或最后一次消息。生存率和毒性比较分别采用卡普兰-梅耶生存分析和卡方检验,显著性水平α设为0.05。结果50名患者中,9人为ATM变异携带者(3个PV/5个VUS/1个良性),41人为非携带者。大多数患者无吸烟史(68%),浸润性导管癌是主要诊断依据(82%)。大多数患者接受了乳腺保守手术(80%),主要的 RT 技术是三维适形放射治疗(70%)和等中心侧卧位放射治疗(30%)。中位 RT 剂量为 50 Gy,平均时间为 36.5 天。诊断后的中位随访时间为 12 年,两组患者在急性皮炎、食管炎、淋巴水肿、皮肤纤维化、毛细血管扩张或心脏病方面无明显差异。总生存率(OS)分析表明,5年的OS为98%,10年时降至89%。ATM变异携带者的5年、10年和15年生存率分别为100%、89%和89%,与非携带者相似。卡普兰-梅耶尔分析显示,各组患者的5年、10年和15年总生存率、无进展生存率、局部失败特异性生存率和对侧乳腺癌发病率均无明显差异。结论在非转移性乳腺癌患者中,单倍性ATM变异载体状态对急性或晚期RT毒性和生存结果没有显著影响。这些研究结果来自于一个小型队列,强调了进一步验证前瞻性研究的必要性。表:单等位基因ATM变异携带者与非携带者放疗后的急性和晚期毒性引文格式:Rebecca Zasloff、Samantha Thomas、Kendra Parrish、Astrid Botty van de Bruele、Gayle DiLalla、Maggie DiNome、Laura Rosenberger、Hannah Woriax、E Shelley Hwang、Jennifer Plichta、Akiko Chiba。炎症性乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解率和生存率的种族/族裔差异 [摘要].在:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-10-01。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
ACS Chemical Health & Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety focuses on news, information, and ideas relating to issues and advances in chemical health and safety. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety covers up-to-the minute, in-depth views of safety issues ranging from OSHA and EPA regulations to the safe handling of hazardous waste, from the latest innovations in effective chemical hygiene practices to the courts'' most recent rulings on safety-related lawsuits. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety presents real-world information that health, safety and environmental professionals and others responsible for the safety of their workplaces can put to use right away, identifying potential and developing safety concerns before they do real harm.
期刊最新文献
Developing an In-House Application for Hazardous Chemicals Management Calix[4]resorcinarenes as Stable, Metal-Free Unexplored and Unfathomed Material for Iodine Capture: Experimental and Theoretical Insights Risk Assessment of Ammonia Fueled Ships: Consequences on Human Health of Ammonia Releases from Damaged Fuel Storage Tanks Preparation of Fe-doped In2S3/In2O3 Composite for Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline The Gist of the List
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1