Intrathecal Analgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery

M. Matouk, N. Kachouane, F. Chettibi
{"title":"Intrathecal Analgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery","authors":"M. Matouk, N. Kachouane, F. Chettibi","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Thoracic surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain involving parietal, visceral, and projected components. Potent analgesia at rest and during movement over an extended period is crucial. Thoracic epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard, but intrathecal analgesia may represent a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of intrathecal analgesia to provide comparable pain relief to thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery. Methods: This prospective, descriptive study was conducted over 12 months. Adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were included after obtaining written informed consent. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (Epidural group, n=40) with a loading dose of 10 ml 0.1% bupivacaine + 10 mcg sufentanil followed by continuous infusion, or intrathecal analgesia (Intrathecal group, n=23) with a single injection of 500 mcg morphine + 10 mcg sufentanil. Standardized general anesthesia and postoperative care protocols were applied. Primary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain scores (NRS 0-10), rescue analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results: The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was higher in the Epidural group (30% vs 8.7%, p=0.04). Postoperative pain scores were initially lower in the Intrathecal group, but the difference was not significant beyond 18 hours. Rescue morphine requirements were significantly higher in the Epidural group during the first 12 postoperative hours. Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the Intrathecal group (82.6% vs 62.5%, p=0.03). The incidence of nausea/vomiting and pruritus was significantly higher in the Intrathecal group. Discussion: Thoracic epidural analgesia was associated with a higher risk of intraoperative hypotension, likely due to the extended sympathetic blockade. Intrathecal analgesia provided superior early postoperative ....","PeriodicalId":504829,"journal":{"name":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain involving parietal, visceral, and projected components. Potent analgesia at rest and during movement over an extended period is crucial. Thoracic epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard, but intrathecal analgesia may represent a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of intrathecal analgesia to provide comparable pain relief to thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery. Methods: This prospective, descriptive study was conducted over 12 months. Adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were included after obtaining written informed consent. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (Epidural group, n=40) with a loading dose of 10 ml 0.1% bupivacaine + 10 mcg sufentanil followed by continuous infusion, or intrathecal analgesia (Intrathecal group, n=23) with a single injection of 500 mcg morphine + 10 mcg sufentanil. Standardized general anesthesia and postoperative care protocols were applied. Primary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain scores (NRS 0-10), rescue analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results: The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was higher in the Epidural group (30% vs 8.7%, p=0.04). Postoperative pain scores were initially lower in the Intrathecal group, but the difference was not significant beyond 18 hours. Rescue morphine requirements were significantly higher in the Epidural group during the first 12 postoperative hours. Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the Intrathecal group (82.6% vs 62.5%, p=0.03). The incidence of nausea/vomiting and pruritus was significantly higher in the Intrathecal group. Discussion: Thoracic epidural analgesia was associated with a higher risk of intraoperative hypotension, likely due to the extended sympathetic blockade. Intrathecal analgesia provided superior early postoperative ....
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘内镇痛与胸腔硬膜外镇痛在胸外科手术中的应用
导言:胸腔手术会引起严重的术后疼痛,包括顶叶、内脏和投射部位的疼痛。休息时和长期运动时的强效镇痛至关重要。胸腔硬膜外镇痛被认为是金标准,但鞘内镇痛可能是一种有前途的替代方法。本研究旨在评估鞘内镇痛能否为胸外科手术提供与胸硬膜外镇痛相当的镇痛效果。方法:这项前瞻性描述性研究历时 12 个月。接受择期胸外科手术的成人患者在获得书面知情同意后被纳入研究。患者被随机分配接受胸腔硬膜外镇痛(硬膜外组,人数=40),剂量为10毫升0.1%布比卡因+10微克舒芬太尼,然后持续输注;或鞘内镇痛(鞘内组,人数=23),单次注射500微克吗啡+10微克舒芬太尼。采用标准化的全身麻醉和术后护理方案。主要结果包括术中血流动力学、术后疼痛评分(NRS 0-10)、抢救镇痛药需求、患者满意度和不良反应。结果:硬膜外麻醉组术中低血压发生率更高(30% 对 8.7%,P=0.04)。鞘内注射组术后疼痛评分最初较低,但 18 小时后差异不显著。硬膜外麻醉组在术后最初 12 小时内的吗啡抢救需求量明显更高。鞘内注射组患者的总体满意度更高(82.6% 对 62.5%,P=0.03)。鞘内注射组的恶心/呕吐和瘙痒发生率明显更高。讨论胸硬膜外镇痛与术中低血压风险较高有关,这可能是由于交感神经阻滞时间延长所致。鞘内镇痛可在术后早期提供更好的....。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Correlation between Semi quantitative HBeAg and HBV DNA Levels: Validating HBeAg Quantification as a Marker in Asymptomatic HBeAg-Positive Carriers Evaluating Intraocular Pressure Outcomes Following Ocular Contusion “Medical Induction for Intrauterine Fetal Death (IUFD) in a Tertiary Care Hospital” Prediction of Urosepsis Following PCNL: A Retrospective Cohort Study Port Site Local Anaesthetics Application Versus Standard Analgesics for Postoperative Pain Control in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1