Abstract PO1-06-09: Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ACS Chemical Health & Safety Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-06-09
S. Phadke, Kari Wisinski, O. Danciu, Ami N. Shah, Menggang Yu, Yi Chen, Kathy Miller, Mark Burkard
{"title":"Abstract PO1-06-09: Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337","authors":"S. Phadke, Kari Wisinski, O. Danciu, Ami N. Shah, Menggang Yu, Yi Chen, Kathy Miller, Mark Burkard","doi":"10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-06-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Up to 2/3 of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have acquired defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, yet poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) monotherapy has been largely ineffective in the absence of a germline BRCA 1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2). Phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway alterations are also common in breast cancers. Preclinical data suggest that PI3K/mTOR inhibition may disrupt normal function of the HR complex and increase dependency on PARP enzymes for HR DNA repair. Thus, combining a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with a PARPi may result in a synergistic anti-neoplastic effect. The run-in portion of this study evaluated the safety of weekly IV gedatolisib (PI3K/mTORi) and continuous daily talazoparib to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). A 3+3 design for dose escalation explored two dose levels. The phase II study began once the MTD and R2PD were confirmed. Eligibility required age ≥ 18, 1-2 prior lines of therapy (protocol later amended to allow up to 3 lines), and advanced TNBC or advanced HER2-negative BC with gBRCA1/2 mutation. The sample size for the phase II study was determined based on a 1-sided binomial test under the null and alternative ORR of 5% vs 20% with a type I error rate of 0.1 and power level of 80%. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in TNBC without known gBRCA1/2 with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with a gBRCA1/2 mutation were not included in the primary endpoint analysis. Correlative studies are planned to evaluate HR deficiency mutations, PIK3CA mutations, and other exploratory genomics. A total of 33 patients were enrolled: 14 in the safety run-in phase of the trial and 19 in the phase II study (17 TNBC, 2 with gBRCA2 mutation). In the safety run-in, 6 patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (0.75 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly) and 8 at dose level 2 (1 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly). 42% of the cohort developed hyperglycemia, which was mostly grade 1. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at dose level 1. There were 3 patients who experienced grade 4 AEs, thrombocytopenia (2) and lymphopenia (1) which were outside of the DLT window. The MTD was 1 mg of talazoparib daily and 180 mg of gedatolisib weekly, and this was selected as the RP2D. A protocol amendment was made during the phase II portion to allow for a 3 week on/1 week off schedule for gedatolisib due to emerging data showing a more favorable safety profile and enhanced antitumor activity with this dosing schedule. In the 17 patients with TNBC and no gBRCA mutation in the phase II cohort, the ORR was 12%. Best response was partial response (PR) in 2 patients (12%), stable disease (SD) in 7 patients (41%), and progressive disease (PD) in 8 patients (47%). The clinical benefit rate (ORR+SD) at 16 weeks was 23.5%. The most common adverse events (AEs) in all 33 patients were anemia (70%), fatigue (67%), oral mucositis (64%), nausea (60%), neutropenia (45%) and anorexia (45%). Of these, most were grade 1-2 other than anemia (35% grade 3), neutropenia (20% grade 3), fatigue (18% grade 3), and oral mucositis (10% grade 3). There were no grade 4 AEs in the phase II study. Median PFS was approximately 3 months and median OS was approximately 6.4 months. Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint, there were 2 TNBC patients without a gBRCA1/2 mutation who achieved a partial response to this non-chemotherapy regimen. Future biomarker testing may help elucidate these findings and possible predictors of response.\n Citation Format: Sneha Phadke, Kari Wisinski, Oana Danciu, Ami Shah, Menggang Yu, Yi Chen, Kathy Miller, Mark Burkard. Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-09.","PeriodicalId":12,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Health & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po1-06-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Up to 2/3 of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have acquired defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, yet poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) monotherapy has been largely ineffective in the absence of a germline BRCA 1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2). Phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway alterations are also common in breast cancers. Preclinical data suggest that PI3K/mTOR inhibition may disrupt normal function of the HR complex and increase dependency on PARP enzymes for HR DNA repair. Thus, combining a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with a PARPi may result in a synergistic anti-neoplastic effect. The run-in portion of this study evaluated the safety of weekly IV gedatolisib (PI3K/mTORi) and continuous daily talazoparib to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). A 3+3 design for dose escalation explored two dose levels. The phase II study began once the MTD and R2PD were confirmed. Eligibility required age ≥ 18, 1-2 prior lines of therapy (protocol later amended to allow up to 3 lines), and advanced TNBC or advanced HER2-negative BC with gBRCA1/2 mutation. The sample size for the phase II study was determined based on a 1-sided binomial test under the null and alternative ORR of 5% vs 20% with a type I error rate of 0.1 and power level of 80%. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in TNBC without known gBRCA1/2 with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with a gBRCA1/2 mutation were not included in the primary endpoint analysis. Correlative studies are planned to evaluate HR deficiency mutations, PIK3CA mutations, and other exploratory genomics. A total of 33 patients were enrolled: 14 in the safety run-in phase of the trial and 19 in the phase II study (17 TNBC, 2 with gBRCA2 mutation). In the safety run-in, 6 patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (0.75 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly) and 8 at dose level 2 (1 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly). 42% of the cohort developed hyperglycemia, which was mostly grade 1. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at dose level 1. There were 3 patients who experienced grade 4 AEs, thrombocytopenia (2) and lymphopenia (1) which were outside of the DLT window. The MTD was 1 mg of talazoparib daily and 180 mg of gedatolisib weekly, and this was selected as the RP2D. A protocol amendment was made during the phase II portion to allow for a 3 week on/1 week off schedule for gedatolisib due to emerging data showing a more favorable safety profile and enhanced antitumor activity with this dosing schedule. In the 17 patients with TNBC and no gBRCA mutation in the phase II cohort, the ORR was 12%. Best response was partial response (PR) in 2 patients (12%), stable disease (SD) in 7 patients (41%), and progressive disease (PD) in 8 patients (47%). The clinical benefit rate (ORR+SD) at 16 weeks was 23.5%. The most common adverse events (AEs) in all 33 patients were anemia (70%), fatigue (67%), oral mucositis (64%), nausea (60%), neutropenia (45%) and anorexia (45%). Of these, most were grade 1-2 other than anemia (35% grade 3), neutropenia (20% grade 3), fatigue (18% grade 3), and oral mucositis (10% grade 3). There were no grade 4 AEs in the phase II study. Median PFS was approximately 3 months and median OS was approximately 6.4 months. Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint, there were 2 TNBC patients without a gBRCA1/2 mutation who achieved a partial response to this non-chemotherapy regimen. Future biomarker testing may help elucidate these findings and possible predictors of response. Citation Format: Sneha Phadke, Kari Wisinski, Oana Danciu, Ami Shah, Menggang Yu, Yi Chen, Kathy Miller, Mark Burkard. Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-09.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要 PO1-06-09:Gedatolisib联合Talazoparib治疗晚期三阴性或BRCA1/2阳性、HER2阴性乳腺癌的安全性试验Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337
多达三分之二的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)在同源重组(HR)DNA 修复方面存在后天缺陷,但如果没有种系 BRCA 1/2突变(gBRCA1/2),聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)单药治疗基本无效。磷酸肌酸-3-激酶(PI3K)/mTOR 通路改变在乳腺癌中也很常见。临床前数据表明,PI3K/mTOR 抑制可能会破坏 HR 复合物的正常功能,增加 HR DNA 修复对 PARP 酶的依赖性。因此,将 PI3K/mTOR 抑制剂与 PARPi 结合使用可能会产生协同抗肿瘤效果。本研究的磨合期部分评估了每周静脉注射吉达替尼(PI3K/mTORi)和每天持续服用他唑帕利的安全性,以确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)和推荐的二期剂量(RP2D)。采用3+3的剂量升级设计,探索两个剂量水平。一旦MTD和R2PD得到确认,II期研究即开始。入选资格要求年龄≥18岁,既往接受过1-2种治疗(方案后修订为最多可接受3种治疗),晚期TNBC或晚期HER2阴性BC伴有gBRCA1/2突变。II期研究的样本量是根据5% vs 20%的空值和备选ORR下的单侧二项式检验确定的,I型错误率为0.1,功率水平为80%。研究的主要终点是未发现 gBRCA1/2 的 TNBC 患者的总反应率 (ORR),次要终点是无进展生存期 (PFS) 和总生存期 (OS)。有 gBRCA1/2 基因突变的患者未纳入主要终点分析。计划进行相关研究,以评估HR缺陷突变、PIK3CA突变和其他探索性基因组学。共有 33 名患者入组:14名患者参加了试验的安全运行阶段,19名患者参加了II期研究(17名TNBC患者,2名gBRCA2突变患者)。在安全性试验阶段,6名患者接受了剂量水平1的治疗(每天0.75毫克talazoparib和每周180毫克gedatolisib静脉注射),8名患者接受了剂量水平2的治疗(每天1毫克talazoparib和每周180毫克gedatolisib静脉注射)。42%的患者出现了高血糖,大部分为1级。在剂量水平1时,有1例出现3级中性粒细胞减少的DLT。有3名患者出现了4级AE,分别是血小板减少症(2例)和淋巴细胞减少症(1例),均在DLT窗口之外。MTD为每天服用1毫克talazoparib和每周服用180毫克gedatolisib,这被选为RP2D。由于新出现的数据显示这种给药方案具有更佳的安全性和更强的抗肿瘤活性,因此在II期研究中对方案进行了修订,允许gedatolisib采用3周开/1周停的给药方案。在II期群组中,17名TNBC且无gBRCA突变的患者的ORR为12%。最佳反应为部分反应(PR)的患者有 2 例(12%),病情稳定(SD)的患者有 7 例(41%),病情进展(PD)的患者有 8 例(47%)。16周时的临床获益率(ORR+SD)为23.5%。在所有33名患者中,最常见的不良事件(AEs)为贫血(70%)、疲劳(67%)、口腔粘膜炎(64%)、恶心(60%)、中性粒细胞减少(45%)和厌食(45%)。其中,除贫血(35%为3级)、中性粒细胞减少(20%为3级)、疲劳(18%为3级)和口腔黏膜炎(10%为3级)外,大多数为1-2级。II 期研究中没有出现 4 级 AE。中位 PFS 约为 3 个月,中位 OS 约为 6.4 个月。虽然这项研究没有达到主要终点,但有2名没有gBRCA1/2突变的TNBC患者对这种非化疗方案产生了部分反应。未来的生物标志物检测可能有助于阐明这些发现和可能的反应预测因素。引用格式:Sneha Phadke, Kari Wisinski, Oana Danciu, Ami Shah, Menggang Yu, Yi Chen, Kathy Miller, Mark Burkard.Gedatolisib加Talazoparib治疗晚期三阴性或BRCA1/2阳性、HER2阴性乳腺癌的2期试验与安全性试验Big Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337 [摘要].In:2023 年圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会论文集;2023 年 12 月 5-9 日;德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥。费城(宾夕法尼亚州):AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-09.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Chemical Health & Safety
ACS Chemical Health & Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety focuses on news, information, and ideas relating to issues and advances in chemical health and safety. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety covers up-to-the minute, in-depth views of safety issues ranging from OSHA and EPA regulations to the safe handling of hazardous waste, from the latest innovations in effective chemical hygiene practices to the courts'' most recent rulings on safety-related lawsuits. The Journal of Chemical Health and Safety presents real-world information that health, safety and environmental professionals and others responsible for the safety of their workplaces can put to use right away, identifying potential and developing safety concerns before they do real harm.
期刊最新文献
Developing an In-House Application for Hazardous Chemicals Management Calix[4]resorcinarenes as Stable, Metal-Free Unexplored and Unfathomed Material for Iodine Capture: Experimental and Theoretical Insights Risk Assessment of Ammonia Fueled Ships: Consequences on Human Health of Ammonia Releases from Damaged Fuel Storage Tanks Preparation of Fe-doped In2S3/In2O3 Composite for Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline The Gist of the List
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1