Daniel E. Gustavson , Jeremy A. Elman , Chandra A. Reynolds , Lisa T. Eyler , Christine Fennema-Notestine , Olivia K. Puckett , Matthew S. Panizzon , Nathan A. Gillespie , Michael C. Neale , Michael J. Lyons , Carol E. Franz , William S. Kremen
{"title":"Brain reserve in midlife is associated with executive function changes across 12 years","authors":"Daniel E. Gustavson , Jeremy A. Elman , Chandra A. Reynolds , Lisa T. Eyler , Christine Fennema-Notestine , Olivia K. Puckett , Matthew S. Panizzon , Nathan A. Gillespie , Michael C. Neale , Michael J. Lyons , Carol E. Franz , William S. Kremen","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examined how brain reserve in midlife, measured by brain-predicted age difference scores (Brain-PADs), predicted executive function concurrently and longitudinally into early old age, and whether these associations were moderated by young adult cognitive reserve or <em>APOE</em> genotype. 508 men in the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging (VETSA) completed neuroimaging assessments at mean age 56 and six executive function tasks at mean ages 56, 62, and 68 years. Results indicated that greater brain reserve at age 56 was associated with better concurrent executive function (<em>r</em>=.10, <em>p</em>=.040) and less decline in executive function over 12 years (<em>r</em>=.34, <em>p</em>=.001). These associations were not moderated by cognitive reserve or <em>APOE</em> genotype. Twin analysis suggested associations with executive function slopes were driven by genetic influences. Our findings suggest that greater brain reserve allowed for better cognitive maintenance from middle- to old age, driven by a genetic association. The results are consistent with differential preservation of executive function based on brain reserve that is independent of young adult cognitive reserve or <em>APOE</em> genotype.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19110,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Aging","volume":"141 ","pages":"Pages 113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458024000927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examined how brain reserve in midlife, measured by brain-predicted age difference scores (Brain-PADs), predicted executive function concurrently and longitudinally into early old age, and whether these associations were moderated by young adult cognitive reserve or APOE genotype. 508 men in the Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging (VETSA) completed neuroimaging assessments at mean age 56 and six executive function tasks at mean ages 56, 62, and 68 years. Results indicated that greater brain reserve at age 56 was associated with better concurrent executive function (r=.10, p=.040) and less decline in executive function over 12 years (r=.34, p=.001). These associations were not moderated by cognitive reserve or APOE genotype. Twin analysis suggested associations with executive function slopes were driven by genetic influences. Our findings suggest that greater brain reserve allowed for better cognitive maintenance from middle- to old age, driven by a genetic association. The results are consistent with differential preservation of executive function based on brain reserve that is independent of young adult cognitive reserve or APOE genotype.
期刊介绍:
Neurobiology of Aging publishes the results of studies in behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, morphology, neurology, neuropathology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry in which the primary emphasis involves mechanisms of nervous system changes with age or diseases associated with age. Reviews and primary research articles are included, occasionally accompanied by open peer commentary. Letters to the Editor and brief communications are also acceptable. Brief reports of highly time-sensitive material are usually treated as rapid communications in which case editorial review is completed within six weeks and publication scheduled for the next available issue.