Exploring the perceived effectiveness and strictness of penalties for traffic offences: The influence of prior punishment experience and evaluation perspective (personal vs. general)

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.04.010
Rasa Markšaitytė , Auksė Endriulaitienė , Laura Šeibokaitė , Tadas Vadvilavičius , Mark Sullman
{"title":"Exploring the perceived effectiveness and strictness of penalties for traffic offences: The influence of prior punishment experience and evaluation perspective (personal vs. general)","authors":"Rasa Markšaitytė ,&nbsp;Auksė Endriulaitienė ,&nbsp;Laura Šeibokaitė ,&nbsp;Tadas Vadvilavičius ,&nbsp;Mark Sullman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Previous research has identified the perception of penalties as one of the most important deterrents to road traffic offenses. This study investigated whether the perceived effectiveness and the perceived strictness of penalties for different traffic offenses are associated with prior punishment experience and evaluation perspective (personal – if participants were being punished themselves, vs. general – for punishing all drivers). <em>Method:</em> A convenience sample of 1,374 Lithuanian drivers participated in the survey (56.3% males; aged 18–77 years). Among them, 801 participants had no penalties for traffic offenses, 333 reported monetary fines in the last year, and 240 reported having their drivers license suspended at least once in their driving career. A scale with 10 specific penalties for traffic offenses was developed to measure the perceived effectiveness and strictness of penalties. Half of the participants evaluated the penalties as if they were personally sanctioned for each traffic offense (personal perspective), while the other half assessed the effectiveness and strictness of the penalties for drivers in general. <em>Results:</em> The results indicated that the perceived effectiveness of penalties was related to the evaluation perspective, being higher for changing one’s own behavior than for changing behavior in general. However, the perceived effectiveness of penalties was not related to prior punishment experience. Males and drivers who had experienced their license being suspended reported the highest perceived strictness of the penalties, whereas females and drivers with no prior punishment experience perceived penalties as the least strict. <em>Practical applications:</em> These findings suggest the need for developing new ways of communicating penalties to different groups of drivers. Nevertheless, this research was exploratory in nature and further research is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous research has identified the perception of penalties as one of the most important deterrents to road traffic offenses. This study investigated whether the perceived effectiveness and the perceived strictness of penalties for different traffic offenses are associated with prior punishment experience and evaluation perspective (personal – if participants were being punished themselves, vs. general – for punishing all drivers). Method: A convenience sample of 1,374 Lithuanian drivers participated in the survey (56.3% males; aged 18–77 years). Among them, 801 participants had no penalties for traffic offenses, 333 reported monetary fines in the last year, and 240 reported having their drivers license suspended at least once in their driving career. A scale with 10 specific penalties for traffic offenses was developed to measure the perceived effectiveness and strictness of penalties. Half of the participants evaluated the penalties as if they were personally sanctioned for each traffic offense (personal perspective), while the other half assessed the effectiveness and strictness of the penalties for drivers in general. Results: The results indicated that the perceived effectiveness of penalties was related to the evaluation perspective, being higher for changing one’s own behavior than for changing behavior in general. However, the perceived effectiveness of penalties was not related to prior punishment experience. Males and drivers who had experienced their license being suspended reported the highest perceived strictness of the penalties, whereas females and drivers with no prior punishment experience perceived penalties as the least strict. Practical applications: These findings suggest the need for developing new ways of communicating penalties to different groups of drivers. Nevertheless, this research was exploratory in nature and further research is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索对交通违法行为处罚的有效性和严格性的认知:之前的处罚经验和评价视角(个人与一般)的影响
导言:以往的研究表明,对处罚的感知是遏制道路交通违法行为的最重要因素之一。本研究调查了参与者对不同交通违法行为的处罚效果和处罚严格程度的感知是否与之前的处罚经历和评价角度(个人--如果参与者自己受到处罚,与一般--对所有司机的处罚)有关。调查方法方便抽样调查了 1374 名立陶宛驾驶员(56.3% 为男性,年龄在 18-77 岁之间)。其中,801 名参与者未因交通违法行为受到过处罚,333 名参与者表示在过去一年中受到过罚款,240 名参与者表示在其驾驶生涯中至少被吊销过一次驾照。我们制定了一个包含 10 项具体交通违法处罚措施的量表,以衡量处罚的有效性和严格程度。一半的参与者从个人角度对每次交通违法行为的处罚进行评估(个人角度),另一半参与者则对一般驾驶员的处罚效果和严格程度进行评估。结果显示结果表明,对处罚效果的感知与评价角度有关,对改变个人行为的感知高于对改变一般行为的感知。但是,对处罚效果的感知与之前的处罚经历无关。男性和有过驾照被吊销经历的驾驶员对处罚的严格程度感知最高,而女性和没有处罚经历的驾驶员对处罚的严格程度感知最低。实际应用:这些研究结果表明,有必要开发新的方法,向不同的驾驶者群体传达处罚信息。不过,这项研究属于探索性质,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
Trends in parcel delivery driver injury: Evidence from NEISS-Work Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed U.S. workers within the Construction sector, 2010–2019 Safety climate and fatigue have differential impacts on safety issues Great to use as a conversation starter: End user views on the acceptability and feasibility of a prototype decision aid for older drivers Investigating perspectives towards online content that promotes road safety: A qualitative study across three age groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1