Has labor-saving technology accelerated? Evidence from industry-level data

IF 5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Structural Change and Economic Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.strueco.2024.05.008
Barış Güven
{"title":"Has labor-saving technology accelerated? Evidence from industry-level data","authors":"Barış Güven","doi":"10.1016/j.strueco.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What role has labor-saving technological change played in the recent past in charting out the trajectory of employment? Have we already transitioned into a new technological regime where production technologies are more invasive upon labor’s terrain? In this study, I provide empirical evidence to answer these questions. Using industry-level data from 12 advanced economies for 1970–2007, I show that capital goods did not become more effective in labor-saving after 1980 or 1990. Similarly, the strength of the relationship between employment and output did not decline after 1980 or 1990. While many recent econometric studies have estimated the number of workers displaced due to industrial robots with which the media and public are highly preoccupied, there is nothing new in the fact that production technologies are labor-saving and displace workers. The importance of demand side factors and structural change (mainly deindustrialization) in determining employment patterns is often neglected, leading to a misleading assessment of the impact of labor-saving technologies on employment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47829,"journal":{"name":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 442-456"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Change and Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X24000638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What role has labor-saving technological change played in the recent past in charting out the trajectory of employment? Have we already transitioned into a new technological regime where production technologies are more invasive upon labor’s terrain? In this study, I provide empirical evidence to answer these questions. Using industry-level data from 12 advanced economies for 1970–2007, I show that capital goods did not become more effective in labor-saving after 1980 or 1990. Similarly, the strength of the relationship between employment and output did not decline after 1980 or 1990. While many recent econometric studies have estimated the number of workers displaced due to industrial robots with which the media and public are highly preoccupied, there is nothing new in the fact that production technologies are labor-saving and displace workers. The importance of demand side factors and structural change (mainly deindustrialization) in determining employment patterns is often neglected, leading to a misleading assessment of the impact of labor-saving technologies on employment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
节省劳动力的技术是否在加速发展?来自行业层面数据的证据
近代以来,节省劳动力的技术变革在描绘就业轨迹方面发挥了什么作用?我们是否已经过渡到了一种新的技术体制,在这种体制下,生产技术对劳动力的影响更大?在本研究中,我提供了实证证据来回答这些问题。通过使用 12 个发达经济体 1970-2007 年的行业数据,我发现资本货物在 1980 年或 1990 年之后并没有更有效地节省劳动力。同样,就业与产出之间的关系强度在 1980 年或 1990 年之后也没有下降。虽然最近的许多计量经济学研究对媒体和公众高度关注的工业机器人导致的工人失业数量进行了估算,但生产技术节省劳动力并导致工人失业这一事实并不新鲜。需求方因素和结构变化(主要是去工业化)在决定就业模式方面的重要性往往被忽视,导致对节省劳动力的技术对就业影响的评估出现误导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics publishes articles about theoretical, applied and methodological aspects of structural change in economic systems. The journal publishes work analysing dynamics and structural breaks in economic, technological, behavioural and institutional patterns.
期刊最新文献
Cash transfers and the Phillips curve: The case of Brazil during the pandemic European institutional quality and carbon emissions: Convergence club analysis The paradox of debt and Minsky cycle: Nonlinear effects of debt and capital and variety of capitalism What drives the corporate payoffs of using generative artificial intelligence? Transition finance facilitates lower-cost achievement of climate targets: A case study of China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1