Reusing biofloc-culture water and microbubble aeration for culturing the white-leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Aquaculture and Fisheries Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aaf.2024.04.010
Ezzah Rahimah Samsuri , Poobalan Ganesan , Iswadi Jauhari , Geok Yuan Annie Tan , Faik A. Hamad
{"title":"Reusing biofloc-culture water and microbubble aeration for culturing the white-leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei","authors":"Ezzah Rahimah Samsuri ,&nbsp;Poobalan Ganesan ,&nbsp;Iswadi Jauhari ,&nbsp;Geok Yuan Annie Tan ,&nbsp;Faik A. Hamad","doi":"10.1016/j.aaf.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the effects of reusing biofloc-culture water for culturing the white-leg shrimp <em>Litopenaeus vannamei</em>. Experiments were conducted for two continuous cycles without water exchange for 30 days during the nursery stage. The studies were performed with two different aeration systems, namely microbubbles (MB) and large air bubbles (LB). Water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, pH, salinity, alkalinity, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrite, nitrate, settleable solids (SS), and total suspended solids (TSS) were recorded throughout the culture days. Also, comparisons were performed on parameters of the shrimp growth, i.e., body weight and length, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and specific growth rates (SGR) for the 30-day culture for Cycles 1 and 2. Cycle 2 showed no deterioration in water quality and no significant difference in growth performance compared to Cycle 1 for either aeration method (MB and LB). However, when comparing between aeration methods, MB aeration significantly improved the DO of the water and accelerated the conversion of TAN to nitrate. Shrimps in the MB aeration system were significantly larger (by 39%) with a lower FCR value (reduced by 30%) than in the LB aeration system. Harmful bacteria from the <em>Vibro</em> group were detected. However, they occurred at a minimum level in both cycles and aeration types. Overall, the biofloc-culture water might be reused for the subsequent cycle, while the MB aeration might promote the growth of biofloc and <em>L. vannamei</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36894,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture and Fisheries","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 687-695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468550X24000625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of reusing biofloc-culture water for culturing the white-leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Experiments were conducted for two continuous cycles without water exchange for 30 days during the nursery stage. The studies were performed with two different aeration systems, namely microbubbles (MB) and large air bubbles (LB). Water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, pH, salinity, alkalinity, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrite, nitrate, settleable solids (SS), and total suspended solids (TSS) were recorded throughout the culture days. Also, comparisons were performed on parameters of the shrimp growth, i.e., body weight and length, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and specific growth rates (SGR) for the 30-day culture for Cycles 1 and 2. Cycle 2 showed no deterioration in water quality and no significant difference in growth performance compared to Cycle 1 for either aeration method (MB and LB). However, when comparing between aeration methods, MB aeration significantly improved the DO of the water and accelerated the conversion of TAN to nitrate. Shrimps in the MB aeration system were significantly larger (by 39%) with a lower FCR value (reduced by 30%) than in the LB aeration system. Harmful bacteria from the Vibro group were detected. However, they occurred at a minimum level in both cycles and aeration types. Overall, the biofloc-culture water might be reused for the subsequent cycle, while the MB aeration might promote the growth of biofloc and L. vannamei.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复使用生物絮凝培养水和微泡曝气法培养南美白对虾
本试验研究了重复利用生物絮凝水体养殖凡纳滨对虾的效果。苗期连续2个周期不换水30 d。研究采用两种不同的曝气系统,即微气泡(MB)和大气泡(LB)。在整个培养过程中记录溶解氧(DO)、温度、pH、盐度、碱度、总氨氮(TAN)、亚硝酸盐、硝酸盐、可沉降固形物(SS)和总悬浮固形物(TSS)等水质参数。并比较了第1和第2周期30 d的对虾生长参数,即体重和体长、饲料系数(FCR)和特定生长率(SGR)。两种曝气方式(MB和LB)在循环2中均未出现水质恶化,生长性能与循环1无显著差异。然而,在不同曝气方式的对比中,MB曝气显著提高了水体的DO,加速了TAN向硝酸盐的转化。与LB曝气系统相比,MB曝气系统对虾体型显著增大(增加39%),FCR值显著降低(减少30%)。检测了Vibro组的有害细菌。然而,在循环和曝气类型中,它们都发生在最低水平。综上所述,生物絮团培养水可在后续循环中重复使用,而MB曝气可促进生物絮团和凡纳梅的生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture and Fisheries
Aquaculture and Fisheries Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Effects of different temperatures on ovarian development, lipid metabolism and nutritional quality of Eriocheir sinensis during fattening Optimized oligochitosan treatment for preserving postharvest quality of Sepia pharaonis during cold storage Hybrid and green preservation techniques for Penaeus monodon: A review of emerging technologies, shelf life enhancement and research gaps Functional role of non-conventional ascomycetous yeasts in modulating aquaculture species Vitamin D3 supplementation mitigates oxidative stress and ferroptosis, enhancing liver, spleen, and head-kidney health and growth performance in high-density cultured hybrid yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco♀ × Pelteobagrus vachelli♂)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1