Resistance of full-scale beams against close-in explosions. Numerical modeling and field tests

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Defence Technology(防务技术) Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.dt.2024.05.002
{"title":"Resistance of full-scale beams against close-in explosions. Numerical modeling and field tests","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dt.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the performances of a finite element simulation including four concrete models applied to a full-scale reinforced concrete beam subjected to blast loading. Field test data has been used to compare model results for each case. The numerical modelling has been, carried out using the suitable code LS-DYNA. This code integrates blast load routine (CONWEP) for the explosive description and four different material models for the concrete including: Karagozian &amp; Case Concrete, Winfrith, Continuous Surface Cap Model and Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma models, with concrete meshing based on 10, 15, and 20 mm. Six full-scale beams were tested: four of them used for the initial calibration of the numerical model and two more tests at lower scaled distances. For calibration, field data obtained employing pressure and accelerometers transducers were compared with the results derived from the numerical simulation. Damage surfaces and the shape of rupture in the beams have been used as references for comparison. Influence of the meshing on accelerations has been put in evidence and for some models the shape and size of the damage in the beams produced maximum differences around 15%. In all cases, the variations between material and mesh models are shown and discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":58209,"journal":{"name":"Defence Technology(防务技术)","volume":"40 ","pages":"Pages 35-47"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Technology(防务技术)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214914724001090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the performances of a finite element simulation including four concrete models applied to a full-scale reinforced concrete beam subjected to blast loading. Field test data has been used to compare model results for each case. The numerical modelling has been, carried out using the suitable code LS-DYNA. This code integrates blast load routine (CONWEP) for the explosive description and four different material models for the concrete including: Karagozian & Case Concrete, Winfrith, Continuous Surface Cap Model and Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma models, with concrete meshing based on 10, 15, and 20 mm. Six full-scale beams were tested: four of them used for the initial calibration of the numerical model and two more tests at lower scaled distances. For calibration, field data obtained employing pressure and accelerometers transducers were compared with the results derived from the numerical simulation. Damage surfaces and the shape of rupture in the beams have been used as references for comparison. Influence of the meshing on accelerations has been put in evidence and for some models the shape and size of the damage in the beams produced maximum differences around 15%. In all cases, the variations between material and mesh models are shown and discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全尺寸梁抵抗近距离爆炸的能力:数值建模和现场试验
本文探讨了有限元模拟的性能,包括应用于承受爆炸荷载的全尺寸钢筋混凝土梁的四种混凝土模型。现场测试数据用于比较每种情况下的模型结果。数值建模采用了合适的 LS-DYNA 代码。该代码集成了用于爆炸描述的爆炸荷载例程(CONWEP)和四种不同的混凝土材料模型,包括Karagozian & Case Concrete、Winfrith、Continuous Surface Cap Model 和 Riedel-Hiermaier-Thoma 模型,混凝土网格划分为 10、15 和 20 毫米。对六根全尺寸梁进行了测试:其中四根用于数值模型的初始校准,另外两根用于较小比例距离的测试。校准时,采用压力和加速度传感器获得的现场数据与数值模拟得出的结果进行了比较。梁的损伤面和断裂形状被用作比较的参考。网格划分对加速度的影响已得到证实,对某些模型而言,梁中损伤的形状和大小产生的最大差异约为 15%。在所有情况下,材料和网格模型之间的差异都得到了显示和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Defence Technology(防务技术)
Defence Technology(防务技术) Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
728
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Defence Technology, a peer reviewed journal, is published monthly and aims to become the best international academic exchange platform for the research related to defence technology. It publishes original research papers having direct bearing on defence, with a balanced coverage on analytical, experimental, numerical simulation and applied investigations. It covers various disciplines of science, technology and engineering.
期刊最新文献
IFC - Editorial Board Analysis model for damage of reinforced bars in RC beams under contact explosion Modelling of internal ballistics of gun systems: A review A tensile wearable SHF antenna with efficient communication in defense beacon technology An isogeometric analysis approach for dynamic response of doubly-curved magneto electro elastic composite shallow shell subjected to blast loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1