Variation in partial direct costs of dry cow therapy on 37 large dairy herds

J. Leite de Campos , A. Kates , A. Steinberger , A. Sethi , G. Suen , John Shutske , N. Safdar , Tony Goldberg , P.L. Ruegg
{"title":"Variation in partial direct costs of dry cow therapy on 37 large dairy herds","authors":"J. Leite de Campos ,&nbsp;A. Kates ,&nbsp;A. Steinberger ,&nbsp;A. Sethi ,&nbsp;G. Suen ,&nbsp;John Shutske ,&nbsp;N. Safdar ,&nbsp;Tony Goldberg ,&nbsp;P.L. Ruegg","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this observational study was to estimate partial direct costs of dry cow antibiotic therapy (DCT) protocols used on 37 large dairy herds in Wisconsin and to estimate the potential monetary savings and reduction in antimicrobial usage (AMU) if selective DCT was used. Partial direct costs of DCT were calculated using costs of intramammary (IMM) antimicrobials and teat sealants. Data were retrospectively collected on 37 large dairy farms for a period of 1 yr and included the total number of cows dried off, types of IMM antimicrobial used, and product prices (obtained from farm invoices). A single farm visit was performed to verify data. Clinical mastitis (CM) and SCC history across lactation were used as the criteria to identify cows eligible to receive only teat sealants (no antibiotic DCT) based on adoption of a hypothetical selective DCT program. Descriptive statistics were performed using PROC MEANS to summarize continuous herd and cow characteristics. Differences in costs among IMM antibiotic products and eligibility to not receive antibiotics at dry-off by parity were analyzed using ANOVA. Differences in milk yield at the last test-day and DIM at dry-off based on eligibility for selective DCT were analyzed using PROC MIXED. A total of 35,691 cows were dried off across all herds (n = 37) and most of the herds used IMM antibiotic DCT at dry-off in most of the cows. Teat sealant was used as part of the dry-off protocol in all but 3 herds. Of the enrolled farms, 30 used blanket antibiotic DCT in all quarters of all cows and 7 herds used selective DCT with no administration of antibiotics given to 0.8% to 58% of the dry cows within the herd. Across all farms, the average cost of products given per dried cow was $19.57 ± 0.64 (mean ± SE) and ranged from $8.72 to $24.04. As expected, the cost per dried cow was greater ($23.45 ± $0.38) in herds that used higher cost IMM antibiotics as compared with herds that used lower cost IMM antibiotics ($16.64 ± $0.40). When using an algorithm based on udder health records to hypothetically select cows that would be eligible to receive teat sealants only (no antibiotic DCT), eligibility ranged from 27.3% to 93.3% within-herds and varied by parity, milk yield at last test-day, and DIM at dry-off. If a selective DCT program based on udder health records was used, an overall reduction of $5.37 (27% of total costs) per dry cow would be expected. Likewise, adoption of selective DCT based on udder health records would reduce AMU at dry-off by approximately 51%. However, neither of these estimates included potential adverse health complications (such as increased CM) that can occur if selective DCT programs are not effectively performed. Variations in partial direct costs at dry-off were observed among herds based on treatment protocols. In herds that have good udder health management and contagious mastitis pathogens controlled, adoption of selective DCT based on SCC and history of CM can reduce AMU and partial direct costs of dry cow management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"5 6","pages":"Pages 639-643"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this observational study was to estimate partial direct costs of dry cow antibiotic therapy (DCT) protocols used on 37 large dairy herds in Wisconsin and to estimate the potential monetary savings and reduction in antimicrobial usage (AMU) if selective DCT was used. Partial direct costs of DCT were calculated using costs of intramammary (IMM) antimicrobials and teat sealants. Data were retrospectively collected on 37 large dairy farms for a period of 1 yr and included the total number of cows dried off, types of IMM antimicrobial used, and product prices (obtained from farm invoices). A single farm visit was performed to verify data. Clinical mastitis (CM) and SCC history across lactation were used as the criteria to identify cows eligible to receive only teat sealants (no antibiotic DCT) based on adoption of a hypothetical selective DCT program. Descriptive statistics were performed using PROC MEANS to summarize continuous herd and cow characteristics. Differences in costs among IMM antibiotic products and eligibility to not receive antibiotics at dry-off by parity were analyzed using ANOVA. Differences in milk yield at the last test-day and DIM at dry-off based on eligibility for selective DCT were analyzed using PROC MIXED. A total of 35,691 cows were dried off across all herds (n = 37) and most of the herds used IMM antibiotic DCT at dry-off in most of the cows. Teat sealant was used as part of the dry-off protocol in all but 3 herds. Of the enrolled farms, 30 used blanket antibiotic DCT in all quarters of all cows and 7 herds used selective DCT with no administration of antibiotics given to 0.8% to 58% of the dry cows within the herd. Across all farms, the average cost of products given per dried cow was $19.57 ± 0.64 (mean ± SE) and ranged from $8.72 to $24.04. As expected, the cost per dried cow was greater ($23.45 ± $0.38) in herds that used higher cost IMM antibiotics as compared with herds that used lower cost IMM antibiotics ($16.64 ± $0.40). When using an algorithm based on udder health records to hypothetically select cows that would be eligible to receive teat sealants only (no antibiotic DCT), eligibility ranged from 27.3% to 93.3% within-herds and varied by parity, milk yield at last test-day, and DIM at dry-off. If a selective DCT program based on udder health records was used, an overall reduction of $5.37 (27% of total costs) per dry cow would be expected. Likewise, adoption of selective DCT based on udder health records would reduce AMU at dry-off by approximately 51%. However, neither of these estimates included potential adverse health complications (such as increased CM) that can occur if selective DCT programs are not effectively performed. Variations in partial direct costs at dry-off were observed among herds based on treatment protocols. In herds that have good udder health management and contagious mastitis pathogens controlled, adoption of selective DCT based on SCC and history of CM can reduce AMU and partial direct costs of dry cow management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
37 个大型奶牛场干奶牛治疗部分直接成本的变化
:这项观察性研究的目的是估算威斯康星州 37 个大型奶牛场使用干奶牛抗生素疗法(DCT)方案的部分直接成本,并估算如果使用选择性 DCT,可能节省的资金和减少的抗菌药用量(AMU)。使用乳房内 (IMM) 抗菌剂和乳头密封剂的成本计算了 DCT 的部分直接成本。对 37 个大型奶牛场进行了为期一年的回顾性数据收集,数据包括奶牛干化的总头数、使用的 IMM 抗菌剂类型和产品名称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Getting to grips with resilience: Toward large-scale phenotyping of this complex trait* Development of genomic evaluation for methane efficiency in Canadian Holsteins* Validation and interdevice reliability of a behavior monitoring collar to measure rumination, feeding activity, and idle time of lactating dairy cows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1