A summary of UNSCEAR 2019 report on lung cancer from exposure to radon and research needs

Q1 Health Professions Radiation Medicine and Protection Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1016/j.radmp.2024.05.001
Jing Chen
{"title":"A summary of UNSCEAR 2019 report on lung cancer from exposure to radon and research needs","authors":"Jing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The annex B of the UNSCEAR 2019 Report presented a comprehensive review of dosimetric and epidemiological assessments published in the period 2006 to 2017 for deriving conversion factors for calculating the dose from a given exposure to radon (<sup>222</sup>Rn). The conversion factor is needed for comparison purposes with other sources of radiation exposure. Even though extensive research has been conducted, uncertainties remain large. Given that the uncertainties from both dosimetric and epidemiological studies give rise to a broad range of risk estimates and the fact that values from the current dosimetry and epidemiological reviews are consistent with those used in previous UNSCEAR reports, the Committee recommends the continued use of the dose conversion factor of 9 nSv⋅ ​(h⋅Bq⋅m<sup>−3</sup>)<sup>−1</sup> equilibrium equivalent concentration of <sup>222</sup>Rn for estimating radon exposure levels to a population. This paper summarizes the findings of UNSCEAR's scientific evaluations and its decision regarding the dose conversion factor for population exposure to radon. Research needs for better assessing doses to the lung and risks of lung cancer from exposure to radon are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 215-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555724000297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The annex B of the UNSCEAR 2019 Report presented a comprehensive review of dosimetric and epidemiological assessments published in the period 2006 to 2017 for deriving conversion factors for calculating the dose from a given exposure to radon (222Rn). The conversion factor is needed for comparison purposes with other sources of radiation exposure. Even though extensive research has been conducted, uncertainties remain large. Given that the uncertainties from both dosimetric and epidemiological studies give rise to a broad range of risk estimates and the fact that values from the current dosimetry and epidemiological reviews are consistent with those used in previous UNSCEAR reports, the Committee recommends the continued use of the dose conversion factor of 9 nSv⋅ ​(h⋅Bq⋅m−3)−1 equilibrium equivalent concentration of 222Rn for estimating radon exposure levels to a population. This paper summarizes the findings of UNSCEAR's scientific evaluations and its decision regarding the dose conversion factor for population exposure to radon. Research needs for better assessing doses to the lung and risks of lung cancer from exposure to radon are also discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合国辐射科委 2019 年氡暴露致肺癌报告摘要及研究需求
《2019年辐射科委会报告》附件B对2006年至2017年期间发表的剂量学和流行病学评估进行了全面审查,以得出用于计算给定氡(222Rn)暴露剂量的换算系数。为了与其他辐射照射源进行比较,需要换算系数。尽管进行了广泛的研究,但不确定性仍然很大。鉴于剂量学和流行病学研究的不确定性导致风险估计的范围很广,而且目前的剂量学和流行病学审查的值与以前辐射科委会报告中使用的值一致,委员会建议继续使用剂量转换系数9 nSv⋅(h⋅Bq⋅m−3)−1 222Rn的平衡等效浓度来估计人群的氡暴露水平。本文概述了辐射科委会的科学评价结果及其关于人口接触氡的剂量换算系数的决定。还讨论了更好地评估氡暴露对肺的剂量和肺癌风险的研究需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Comment on “Normal cell responses to 3D-CRT, VMAT, and helical tomotherapy: A comparative study” Comparison of dose sparing between visual feedback guided- and active breathing coordinator-assisted- deep inspiration breath hold for left whole breast radiotherapy Evaluation of the pulmonary perfusion generated by deep learning-based enhanced cone beam computed tomography Deep DIA proteomic analysis of mouse serum in early-stage acute irradiation A comparison of dimensionality reduction approaches for pre-treatment PSMA-PET/CT radiomics in prostate adenocarcinoma outcome prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1