Factors and topics associated with empathic self-disclosure in dignity therapy of cancer patients

Alyssa Crowe , Mary Kate Koch , Susan Bluck , Tithi Amin , Lyndsey Thomas , George Fitchett , Diana J. Wilkie , Carma L. Bylund
{"title":"Factors and topics associated with empathic self-disclosure in dignity therapy of cancer patients","authors":"Alyssa Crowe ,&nbsp;Mary Kate Koch ,&nbsp;Susan Bluck ,&nbsp;Tithi Amin ,&nbsp;Lyndsey Thomas ,&nbsp;George Fitchett ,&nbsp;Diana J. Wilkie ,&nbsp;Carma L. Bylund","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>During Dignity Therapy a trained provider guides a patient to share their life story and legacy. Providers can demonstrate empathy through empathic self-disclosure (ESD), sharing something substantial and personal about themselves in response to the patient. The current study aims to identify the topics of ESDs and determine whether ESD frequency varied by patient and/or provider characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two coders analyzed 203 audio-recorded, transcribed Dignity Therapy sessions of palliative care patients (<em>M</em> = 65.78 years; <em>SD</em> = 7.43 years, 65.69% women) for ESD. Topic modeling characterized themes of ESD and multilevel modeling examined ESD frequency based on several patient and provider characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ESD occurred in 37% of interviews (<em>M</em> = 0.59, <em>SD</em> = 1.21). Topic modeling revealed five main themes: family, memory, school, geographical experiences, and values/beliefs. Multilevel modeling indicated patient-level differences, including greater rates of ESD when patients were men and older.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ESD seems to be dependent on the context of the patient rather than individual communication style differences. Providers may use ESD in multiple instances, including when similar and different from patients.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>This study introduces and defines the novel concept of ESD. It is among the first to examine patient-provider communication during Dignity Therapy, and the first to specifically examine self-disclosure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000372/pdfft?md5=f416f770dfaa5a57554fe02169b1e5a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000372-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

During Dignity Therapy a trained provider guides a patient to share their life story and legacy. Providers can demonstrate empathy through empathic self-disclosure (ESD), sharing something substantial and personal about themselves in response to the patient. The current study aims to identify the topics of ESDs and determine whether ESD frequency varied by patient and/or provider characteristics.

Methods

Two coders analyzed 203 audio-recorded, transcribed Dignity Therapy sessions of palliative care patients (M = 65.78 years; SD = 7.43 years, 65.69% women) for ESD. Topic modeling characterized themes of ESD and multilevel modeling examined ESD frequency based on several patient and provider characteristics.

Results

ESD occurred in 37% of interviews (M = 0.59, SD = 1.21). Topic modeling revealed five main themes: family, memory, school, geographical experiences, and values/beliefs. Multilevel modeling indicated patient-level differences, including greater rates of ESD when patients were men and older.

Conclusion

ESD seems to be dependent on the context of the patient rather than individual communication style differences. Providers may use ESD in multiple instances, including when similar and different from patients.

Innovation

This study introduces and defines the novel concept of ESD. It is among the first to examine patient-provider communication during Dignity Therapy, and the first to specifically examine self-disclosure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者尊严治疗中与移情自我披露相关的因素和主题
目标在尊严疗法中,训练有素的服务提供者会引导患者分享他们的人生故事和遗产。服务提供者可以通过移情自我披露(ESD)来表达移情,即在回应患者时分享一些关于自己的实质性的个人内容。本研究旨在确定ESD的主题,并确定ESD的频率是否因患者和/或医护人员的特征而异。方法两名编码员分析了203个由姑息关怀患者(M = 65.78岁;SD = 7.43岁,65.69%为女性)录音并转录的 "尊严疗法"(Dignity Therapy)ESD疗程。主题建模描述了可持续发展教育的主题,多层次建模根据患者和提供者的若干特征研究了可持续发展教育的频率。主题建模揭示了五大主题:家庭、记忆、学校、地理经历和价值观/信念。多层次模型显示了患者层面的差异,包括男性和年龄较大的患者使用ESD的比例更高。医疗服务提供者可能会在多种情况下使用ESD,包括在与患者相似和不同的情况下。它是首批研究尊严疗法中患者与医护人员沟通的研究之一,也是首批专门研究自我披露的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring professionals' attitudes toward persistent somatic symptoms: Development, validation, and reliability of the professionals' Attitude to Persistent Somatic Symptoms Questionnaire (PAPSS) Tech + touch: A pilot study to facilitate access to health information technology for Spanish-speaking parents Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum How often are patients recording their healthcare consultations in Australia and why? An online survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1