Resting state electroencephalographic brain activity in neonates can predict age and is indicative of neurodevelopmental outcome

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.002
Amir Ansari , Kirubin Pillay , Emad Arasteh , Anneleen Dereymaeker , Gabriela Schmidt Mellado , Katrien Jansen , Anderson M. Winkler , Gunnar Naulaers , Aomesh Bhatt , Sabine Van Huffel , Caroline Hartley , Maarten De Vos , Rebeccah Slater , Luke Baxter
{"title":"Resting state electroencephalographic brain activity in neonates can predict age and is indicative of neurodevelopmental outcome","authors":"Amir Ansari ,&nbsp;Kirubin Pillay ,&nbsp;Emad Arasteh ,&nbsp;Anneleen Dereymaeker ,&nbsp;Gabriela Schmidt Mellado ,&nbsp;Katrien Jansen ,&nbsp;Anderson M. Winkler ,&nbsp;Gunnar Naulaers ,&nbsp;Aomesh Bhatt ,&nbsp;Sabine Van Huffel ,&nbsp;Caroline Hartley ,&nbsp;Maarten De Vos ,&nbsp;Rebeccah Slater ,&nbsp;Luke Baxter","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates’ biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates’ brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model’s brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The magnitude of neonates’ brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001524/pdfft?md5=de1e91393c4d9b2edcdd51ab5a40241b&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001524-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Electroencephalography (EEG) can be used to estimate neonates’ biological brain age. Discrepancies between postmenstrual age and brain age, termed the brain age gap, can potentially quantify maturational deviation. Existing brain age EEG models are not well suited to clinical cot-side use for estimating neonates’ brain age gap due to their dependency on relatively large data and pre-processing requirements.

Methods

We trained a deep learning model on resting state EEG data from preterm neonates with normal neurodevelopmental Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) outcomes, using substantially reduced data requirements. We subsequently tested this model in two independent datasets from two clinical sites.

Results

In both test datasets, using only 20 min of resting-state EEG activity from a single channel, the model generated accurate age predictions: mean absolute error = 1.03 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) and 0.98 weeks (p-value = 0.0001). In one test dataset, where 9-month follow-up BSID outcomes were available, the average neonatal brain age gap in the severe abnormal outcome group was significantly larger than that of the normal outcome group: difference in mean brain age gap = 0.50 weeks (p-value = 0.04).

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate that the deep learning model generalises to independent datasets from two clinical sites, and that the model’s brain age gap magnitudes differ between neonates with normal and severe abnormal follow-up neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Significance

The magnitude of neonates’ brain age gap, estimated using only 20 min of resting state EEG data from a single channel, can encode information of clinical neurodevelopmental value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿静息状态脑电图脑活动可预测年龄并预示神经发育结果
目的脑电图(EEG)可用于估算新生儿的生物脑龄。月经后年龄与脑龄之间的差异(称为脑龄差距)有可能量化成熟偏差。现有的脑年龄脑电图模型由于依赖于相对较大的数据和预处理要求,不太适合在临床婴儿床上用于估算新生儿的脑年龄差距。结果在这两个测试数据集中,仅使用来自单通道的 20 分钟静息态脑电图活动,该模型就生成了准确的年龄预测:平均绝对误差 = 1.03 周(p 值 = 0.0001)和 0.98 周(p 值 = 0.0001)。在一个有 9 个月 BSID 随访结果的测试数据集中,严重异常结果组的新生儿平均脑龄差距明显大于正常结果组:平均脑龄差距 = 0.50 周(p 值 = 0.04)。结论这些研究结果表明,深度学习模型适用于来自两个临床地点的独立数据集,而且该模型的脑年龄差距大小在神经发育随访结果正常和严重异常的新生儿之间存在差异。意义仅使用来自单通道的 20 分钟静息状态脑电图数据估算新生儿脑年龄差距的大小,可以编码具有临床神经发育价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Infant sleep spindle measures from EEG improve prediction of cerebral palsy Insights into EEG dynamics and network changes preceding dream enactment behaviors in REM sleep behavior disorder The effect of common parameters of bipolar stimulation on brain evoked potentials Determining predictive value of intraoperative electroencephalography changes for delirium development after cardiovascular surgeries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1