Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for addictive behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100773
Andrea Krotter , Gema Aonso-Diego , Ana González-Menéndez , Alba González-Roz , Roberto Secades-Villa , Ángel García-Pérez
{"title":"Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for addictive behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Andrea Krotter ,&nbsp;Gema Aonso-Diego ,&nbsp;Ana González-Menéndez ,&nbsp;Alba González-Roz ,&nbsp;Roberto Secades-Villa ,&nbsp;Ángel García-Pérez","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has expanded in the field of addictive disorders in recent years. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of ACT compared to other active interventions in terms of treatment completion, addiction-related outcomes, and changes in psychological flexibility. Searches were conducted in PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Four random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess the effectiveness of ACT in terms of completion rates and abstinence at the end of treatment (EOT), in the short term (≤6 months follow-up), and in the long term (&gt;6-month follow-up). Participants’ sex and age, the number of ACT sessions, the characteristics of the experimental condition (i.e., ACT combined with pharmacological intervention or non-combined) and the comparison condition (i.e., ACT compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT] or non-CBT interventions), treatment modality (face-to-face or technology-based approaches), and the targeted addictive behavior were examined as moderators. A total of 28 studies were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. There were no differences in EOT completion rates (Log RR = 0.0038; 95% CI: −0.026, 0.034). ACT increased the odds of abstinence at EOT (Log RR = 0.264; 95% CI: 0.046, 0.482) and at short-term follow-up (Log RR = 0.295; 95% CI: 0.108, 0.483), but not in the long term (Log RR = 0.164; 95% CI: −0.101, 0.430). ACT demonstrated higher abstinence rates than CBT conditions at EOT (<em>p</em> = 0.002). A lower age increased abstinence rates in the short (<em>p</em> = 0.004) and long term (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), whereas a greater number of ACT sessions increased long-term abstinence rates (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). ACT is an effective approach for promoting short-term abstinence. In the long term, it is at least as effective as other empirically validated therapies, such as CBT. Further studies are needed to clarify the effects of increasing psychological flexibility on addictive behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221214472400053X/pdfft?md5=5b7d65936ac8daf124b22d2e7dadb353&pid=1-s2.0-S221214472400053X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221214472400053X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has expanded in the field of addictive disorders in recent years. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of ACT compared to other active interventions in terms of treatment completion, addiction-related outcomes, and changes in psychological flexibility. Searches were conducted in PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Four random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to assess the effectiveness of ACT in terms of completion rates and abstinence at the end of treatment (EOT), in the short term (≤6 months follow-up), and in the long term (>6-month follow-up). Participants’ sex and age, the number of ACT sessions, the characteristics of the experimental condition (i.e., ACT combined with pharmacological intervention or non-combined) and the comparison condition (i.e., ACT compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT] or non-CBT interventions), treatment modality (face-to-face or technology-based approaches), and the targeted addictive behavior were examined as moderators. A total of 28 studies were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. There were no differences in EOT completion rates (Log RR = 0.0038; 95% CI: −0.026, 0.034). ACT increased the odds of abstinence at EOT (Log RR = 0.264; 95% CI: 0.046, 0.482) and at short-term follow-up (Log RR = 0.295; 95% CI: 0.108, 0.483), but not in the long term (Log RR = 0.164; 95% CI: −0.101, 0.430). ACT demonstrated higher abstinence rates than CBT conditions at EOT (p = 0.002). A lower age increased abstinence rates in the short (p = 0.004) and long term (p < 0.001), whereas a greater number of ACT sessions increased long-term abstinence rates (p < 0.001). ACT is an effective approach for promoting short-term abstinence. In the long term, it is at least as effective as other empirically validated therapies, such as CBT. Further studies are needed to clarify the effects of increasing psychological flexibility on addictive behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接纳与承诺疗法对成瘾行为的疗效:系统回顾与元分析
近年来,接受与承诺疗法(ACT)在成瘾性疾病领域的应用不断扩大。本系统综述和荟萃分析从治疗完成度、成瘾相关结果以及心理灵活性变化等方面,考察了接纳与承诺疗法与其他积极干预措施相比的有效性。我们在 PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了检索。我们进行了四项随机效应荟萃分析,分别从治疗结束(EOT)、短期(≤6个月的随访)和长期(6个月的随访)的完成率和戒断率方面评估了ACT的有效性。研究将参与者的性别和年龄、ACT治疗次数、实验条件(即ACT与药物干预相结合或不相结合)和对比条件(即ACT与认知行为疗法[CBT]或非CBT干预相比)的特征、治疗模式(面对面或基于技术的方法)以及目标成瘾行为作为调节因素进行了研究。共有 28 项研究被纳入系统综述,22 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。EOT完成率没有差异(Log RR = 0.0038; 95% CI: -0.026, 0.034)。ACT 提高了 EOT(Log RR = 0.264;95% CI:0.046, 0.482)和短期随访(Log RR = 0.295;95% CI:0.108, 0.483)时的戒断几率,但没有提高长期戒断几率(Log RR = 0.164;95% CI:-0.101, 0.430)。在 EOT 阶段,ACT 的戒断率高于 CBT 条件下的戒断率(P = 0.002)。年龄越小,短期戒断率(p = 0.004)和长期戒断率(p < 0.001)越高,而 ACT 治疗次数越多,长期戒断率(p < 0.001)越高。戒毒治疗是促进短期戒毒的有效方法。从长期来看,它至少与其他经过经验验证的疗法(如 CBT)一样有效。还需要进一步的研究来明确提高心理灵活性对成瘾行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of a brief, remote self-compassion intervention for employed mothers Exploring the interconnectedness of depression, anxiety, diabetes distress, and related psychosocial factors in adults with type 2 diabetes: A network analysis Effects of a randomized controlled trial of mobile app-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on depressive symptoms and process variables in college students - Focusing on the mediating effects of acceptance and cognitive defusion- Changes in university students’ behaviour and study burnout risk during ACT-based online course intervention: A mixed methods study Third wave interventions for adolescents with mental health disorders: A systematic review with meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1